Friday, August 8, 2025
Headlines Daily Digest
FCC Kicks Off its Annual Broadband Deployment Review
Don't Miss:
Nebraska Counties Convinced BEAD Changes Will Leave Them Unconnected
News from the FCC








Broadband Funding


State/Local



Wireless

Platforms




How We Live Now





On August 5, the Federal Communications Commission voted to kick off its annual review of the pace and cadence of broadband deployment. The FCC is required to annually assess whether broadband "is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable and timely fashion" by section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the report from this proceeding will be another in a series of updates the Commission has provided over the years. However, in this iteration, the approach the FCC is taking will be "reoriented" to be "technology neutral and holistic" [by being less holistic, of course] in assessing the digital divide in the United States. The Notice of Inquiry provides insight into what exactly that means for Chairman Brendan Carr's FCC. In the 2024 broadband deployment report, the FCC, for the first time, considered broadband affordability, adoption, availability, and equitable access for its determination. In the 2025 proceeding, the FCC is proposing to return to previous approaches and only consider availability.

The Federal Communications Commission adopted new rules to unleash the buildout of secure submarine cable infrastructure. Submarine cable systems carry roughly 99 percent of global internet traffic and are key to further extending America’s leadership in AI and next-generation technologies. The new rules streamline the submarine cable licensing process, give certainty to investors, and accelerate the timelines for building cables. The Report and Order portion of the item adopts a range of measures to protect submarine cables against foreign adversaries. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposes and seeks comment on various additional measures to protect submarine cable security against foreign adversary equipment and services, while incentivizing the use of American submarine cable repair and maintenance ships and the use of trusted technology abroad.

The Federal Communications Commission launched a rulemaking to accelerate infrastructure builds by modernizing its environmental regulations. As part of the FCC’s Build America Agenda, this proceeding aims to cut red tape and unleash new infrastructure projects through a comprehensive review of the FCC’s National Environmental Protection Act rules. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted will examine the FCC’s environmental regulations to align them with the amended NEPA statute, speed up the federal permitting process, support faster infrastructure deployment, and ensure that the Commission’s regulations are clear. The Notice will also take a fresh look at the FCC’s National Historic Preservation Act regulations and other aspects of its environmental regulations. The FCC will seek comment on the terms and exclusions in the updated NEPA statute, including “major federal action,” which triggers federal agencies’ NEPA obligations. It will also ask for input on how the updated NEPA statute should be applied to the Commission’s regulations and on what changes are needed.

The Federal Communications Commission took action to repeal 98 broadcast rules and requirements that have been identified as obsolete, outdated, or unnecessary, including rules dating back nearly 50 years ago for technologies that have been far surpassed in the media marketplace. This marks the latest action in the Commission’s “In re: Delete, Delete, Delete” docket, which seeks public input on identifying FCC rules for the purpose of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens. This action repeals rule provisions identified primarily in the broadcast services section of the regulations that plainly do not serve the public interest any longer because they govern obsolete technology, rules no longer used in practice by the FCC or licensee, or rules that are otherwise outdated or unnecessary. The item repeals rules related to old technology that is no longer used, such as 1970s-era regulations dictating the kind of testing equipment radio stations are required to purchase.

The Federal Communications Commission voted to launch a rulemaking for a ground-up re-examination of the national alert and warning systems, including the Emergency Alert System and Wireless Emergency Alerts. This action will explore whether fundamental changes to these systems could make them more effective, efficient, and better able to serve the public’s needs. Specifically, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will:
- Seek comment on the objectives for effective alert and warning systems.
- Explore which entities need to be able to send alerts to fully accomplish these objectives and how these needs should be addressed in the design of alerting systems.
- Consider the alert transmission capabilities that a national public alert and warning system must have to achieve its objectives, including the need for resilience, geographic targeting, and security.
- Ask whether EAS and WEA are meeting the needs and expectations of both the public and alerting authorities, and if not, whether redesign or targeted changes would allow EAS and WEA to fully reach their potential.
- Examine both the types of information and distribution methods needed to effectively convey information to the public through EAS and WEA.

The Federal Communications Commission voted to accelerate innovation and growth in America’s space economy, most notably for startups and new businesses. The FCC adopted new rules that streamline processes to accelerate the development of neutral-host ground infrastructure that has proven successful in the wireless industry and reduce filing requirements for satellite operators. These reforms intend to boost the nascent Ground-Station-as-a-Service business model that allows multiple satellite systems to share the same ground station. The new rules eliminate needless paperwork and clear regulatory barriers to GSaaS, a business model that gives satellite operators—especially startups and emerging growth companies—the ability to send and receive signals without having to build their own ground infrastructure.

August 7 marks the final chapter of a dark moment in our nation’s history. After months of cowardly capitulation, including an unprecedented payout to settle a meritless lawsuit in exchange for regulatory approval, Paramount and Skydance have completed their merger, and ‘New Paramount’ will be created. This will be a new company, born in shame after trading away fundamental First Amendment principles in pursuit of pure profit. It embraced this Administration’s radical notion that discriminatory behavior should be tolerated and even embraced, while efforts to expand opportunity for everyone should be rejected. More alarmingly, the company agreed to never-before-seen forms of government control over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment—actions that violate both the First Amendment and the law. A government-sanctioned ‘truth arbiter’ will soon arrive at CBS. Their role will be to ensure that journalists at CBS do not criticize this Administration or express views that conflict with its agenda. That should alarm anyone who values the core democratic principle of a free and independent press. I urge others to take notice and find their courage. And I will continue to call out cowardly corporate capitulation for what it is: a betrayal—not just of journalistic independence, but of the public trust.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr announced the appointment of Andy Hendrickson as Chief of the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology. Hendrickson will serve as the Commission’s principal technical advisor, helping to shape spectrum policy, guiding equipment authorization, and ensuring regulatory standards reflect today’s rapidly evolving communications landscape. Ira Keltz, who has served as the FCC’s Acting Chief of OET since October 2024, will resume his prior role as Deputy Chief of OET. Hendrickson brings more than 20 years of technical leadership across telecommunications and large-scale digital infrastructure. Most recently, he served as Chief Technology Officer in the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau, where he guided field operations, consulted on emerging tech, policy, enforcement, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, 911, and network-outage mitigation.

On September 4, states must submit their final proposals, selecting Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment grant winners, to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration for approval. Early signs suggest those awards will favor satellite providers and serve fewer locations than expected. As a refresher, the Trump administration's NTIA revised the rules for the BEAD program in early June. While BEAD previously sought to prioritize fiber deployments, the new rules stipulate states must select the cheapest technology for the job. That change-up required states to re-do their BEAD plans, and the NTIA in July approved all initial proposals from states and territories spelling out how they plan to conduct their grant processes. Now, as states proceed with their revised BEAD bidding processes, early signs suggest that BEAD dollars will reach fewer locations than expected and that low-Earth orbit satellite providers are primed to scoop up billions that were largely off limits in the former, fiber-focused version of the BEAD program.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration has made it very clear that Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment grants should focus largely on cost. And the cheapest way to reach unserved areas is via satellite, which costs as little as $349 for Starlink equipment to get up and running. However, state broadband officers have scrutinized the new BEAD rules, and they’ve honed in on three words: “priority broadband project,” which may offer some wiggle room to give awards to other technologies besides satellite. The new BEAD rules have taken away the preference for fiber and instead put the focus on a priority broadband project, which means any technology that:
- Provides speeds of at least 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload;
- Maintains latency of less than 100 ms;
- Can easily scale over time to meet growing connectivity needs; and
- Supports deployment of 5G, successor wireless technologies, and other advanced services.
While the speed and latency requirements are straightforward, the language about “scale” and “successor wireless technologies” seems to leave discretion for states to determine whether a technology meets the requirements for BEAD. This wiggle room is important as states decide whether they’ll simply award all BEAD grants to satellite because those are the lowest cost, or whether they’ll argue that satellite won’t scale for the future.

Nebraska’s state broadband map—which was carefully designed and included a wealth of local input—received a major jolt with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s changes to the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program. The map is now inundated with industry data from unlicensed fixed wireless providers. Congress allocated $405 million to Nebraska to bring broadband internet to all unserved and underserved locations in the state. Following the release of NTIA’s June 6, 2025, policy notice, the total count of eligible locations for funding from Nebraska’s BEAD program was reduced from 29,597 to 14,288, a 52 percent reduction in eligible locations. Local governments throughout Nebraska are sending letters to their state legislators, congressional delegation, and Governor Jim Pillen to voice their concerns about the BEAD changes. The Southeast Nebraska Development District created a map to illustrate the number of eligible locations eliminated per county, and combined that data with information about which counties have already sent letters voicing concerns. Douglas County, which contains Omaha, lost the most locations of any county in the state—1,737 or 85 percent of its eligible locations due to the new BEAD guidelines.

Vermont Community Broadband Board has completed taking in applications for Vermont’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program. BEAD is a federal program that provides $42.45 billion to expand high-speed internet access by funding planning, infrastructure deployment, and adoption programs in all states and territories. Vermont’s allocation of those funds is almost $229 million. Federal changes to the program in June 2025 required states to complete an additional application round, which has recently ended. Vermont received bids to serve all currently underserved addresses in the state with a mix of technologies, including fiber, hybrid-fiber coaxial, and low-earth orbit satellite.

Broadband is no longer a luxury—it’s essential for economic opportunity, education, and community resilience. The Maine Connectivity Authority is meeting this need by investing in infrastructure through a deeply local, collaborative approach. In June 2025, MCA President Andrew Butcher's 900-mile journey across Maine in a 1984 Westfalia VW van affectionately named “Buttercup” offered more than scenic views—it offered a deep dive into the human side of digital connectivity. The tour, designed to engage local communities and observe broadband projects firsthand, highlighted a unique hypothesis: the more digitally connected we become, the more isolated we may feel as humans. Yet, the conversations, encounters, and collaborations revealed that connectivity, when paired with human engagement, is a powerful enabler of community and opportunity. Buttercup, with its retro charm, proved an unexpected bridge to conversation. From grizzled Harley riders to festival-goers, people were drawn to share their stories, dreams, and experiences. The van became a metaphor for connectivity itself—a way to bring people together in a state defined by vast distances, rugged terrain, and one of the highest concentrations of rural and aging populations in the United States. The Driving Connections Tour revealed a key insight for the telecommunications industry: broadband is not simply about technology—it’s about enabling human connections, educational opportunities, economic development, and equity.

T-Mobile recently wrapped up its $4.3 billion acquisition of UScellular, and the departure of UScellular (as we know it) comes at a weird time.
- Weird thing No. 1: Federal Communications Commission meddling with EchoStar: Once considered an independent agency, the FCC is completely devoid of any sense of impartiality under the second Trump administration and agency Chairman Brendan Carr. The most egregious way this is playing out is in the FCC’s requirement that companies dismantle their diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives to obtain FCC approval for their transactions. Chairman Carr also appears determined to decide the winners and losers in the American wireless business, market dynamics be damned. The most flagrant example of this is with EchoStar and its Dish Network and Boost Mobile brands. Recall that Carr sent a letter to EchoStar Chairman Charlie Ergen in May accusing EchoStar of warehousing spectrum and threatening to take it away, causing EchoStar to go into a tailspin and teeter on the brink of bankruptcy.
- Weird thing No. 2: Disregard for No. 4: This isn’t the first time the industry has wrestled with the question of whether there should be three or four wireless carriers. That was a big question back in 2011 when AT&T tried to acquire T-Mobile. It came up again when T-Mobile was in the process of acquiring Sprint during the first Trump administration in 2019. But apparently none of that matters because, according to Chairman Carr, there is “no magic number” as to how many carriers the U.S. needs in order to have a competitive wireless industry.
- Weird thing No. 3: The D2D obsession: Everybody’s piling onto the next big shiny thing and today that’s the direct-to-device market for satellite coverage direct to everyday smartphones. That includes the embattled EchoStar, which is now looking at D2D to save its soul.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2025. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024



