Monday, August 31, 2026
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Guidance on Applying the Federal Records Act to Artificial Intelligence Materials
What Meta’s $17-billion settlement revealed about the harms of social media
Infrastructure


States/Local


Wireless

Satellites

Security

AI/Platforms





Content




Affordability

Journalism

Agenda

Company News

Stories From Abroad




This monthly installment of the Broadband in America Report builds on the prior semiannual Fixed Broadband Competition Focus edition, which found that fiber growth is increasingly driven by overbuild rather than footprint extension, that large providers are pivoting sharply toward competitive overbuild amid a wave of merger and acquisition activity, and that rural expansion remains dependent on public subsidy support. Drawing on historical build activity, location density, competition metrics, and demographics, the Fiber Forecast Model assigns each unserved location a likelihood score reflecting the model’s confidence that a carrier will deploy fiber there within the next six-month timestep. Depending on carrier aggressiveness, the Fiber Forecast Model estimates between 2.1 and 6.7 million newly fiber-covered locations nationwide over the next six months: a more than threefold spread showing how much near-term fiber growth now hinges on discretionary capital allocation rather than remaining unserved demand. The Fiber Forecast Model identifies AT&T, regional ISPs and mid-sized providers as the leading drivers of near-term deployment, with Florida, Texas, Ohio, Illinois and Georgia emerging as the top growth states: high-growth, mixed-density markets where overbuild economics work best.

I recently saw a question on LinkedIn that asked why we don’t use more metal utility poles instead of wooden ones. It’s a good question, and there are a lot of issues to consider when choosing between the two. One issue to consider is useful life. On paper, the useful life of a wooden pole is thirty to forty years. However, there are plenty of poles that have lasted fifty and even sixty years. Another important issue is cost. Wooden poles have gotten a lot more expensive in recent years. I see prices online today between $250 and $1,300 for a 40-foot pole, with the price varying by thickness and load-bearing ability. Steel poles are more expensive, with a typical price for a 40-foot pole between $2,000 and $3,000.

Michigan Broadband Services will acquire “substantially all assets” of the Educational Access Network from Northern Michigan University’s if the agreement between the organizations closes. MBS would receive licensed 2.5 GHz Educational Broadband Service spectrum covering portions of 41 counties, Nokia AirScale radio equipment deployed across more than 70 tower sites, licensed microwave facilities, and related network infrastructure. EAN has approximately 7,500 subscribers and generates about $2.5 million annually. MBU is a subsidiary of publicly traded MachTen. The Upper Peninsula Telephone Company, a subsidiary of Michigan Broadband, will pay NMU $21 million for the acquired assets. The transaction will be funded through Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program grant proceeds awarded to UPTC and financing from the National Cooperative Services Corporation.
Federal Communications Commissioner Olivia Trusty and Senior Legal Advisor Marcus Maher visited Minot (ND) on August 13 to tour critical communications systems and engage in a roundtable discussion with Minot area leaders. SRT CEO/General Manager Cassidy Hjelmstad, Commissioner Trusty, and Maher toured Minot Air Force Base with officials there before touring SRT’s facilities to get a full picture of the broadband provider and the communities it serves. Outside Plant Engineering Manager Scott Senger presented an overview of SRT from its establishment 75 years ago to its current impact as North Dakota's largest telecommunications cooperative.

The Federal Communications Commission authorized a new Innovation Zone at Iowa State University to provide a platform to develop and refine wireless technologies intended to connect rural communities and to study new use cases for precision agriculture for both crop and livestock farms. Innovation Zones are locations designated for use by specific experimental licensees to foster robust wireless research and development through the testing of new advanced technologies, applications, and prototype networks outside of a traditional small campus or laboratory setting. This Public Notice from the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology also expands the identified spectrum bands in the Innovation Zone at Northeastern University in Boston (MA) and expands the geographical boundaries of existing Innovation Zones at North Carolina State University in Raleigh (NC) and at the Salt Lake City (UT) Innovation Zone.
How to apply the Federal Records Act (FRA) to existing Artificial Intelligence (AI) uses, with a focus on the use of AI platforms. Agencies’ use of AI platforms does not, in and of itself, result in the creation of federal records. Subsequent use of AI-generated materials in agency business may result in the creation of federal records. This memorandum explains the factors agencies should consider when making these determinations. Specifically, whether an AI material is a federal record depends on the circumstances surrounding the creation, maintenance, and use of the materials, such as whether the agency relies on it in decision-making, uses it to conduct official business, circulates the material to others, or incorporates it into an agency system. Agencies may only dispose of AI-related federal records in accordance with a NARA-approved records schedule. Existing General Records Schedules (GRS) authorize agencies to dispose of AI-related federal records when they reach the specified retention period. When agencies create federal records while using AI, these records may be “transitory” records that can be destroyed when no longer needed or “intermediary” records that may be destroyed upon creation of the subsequent record.

Internal documents show Meta knew for years that its youngest users were the most likely to be targeted by bullies, extortionists and sexual predators. Yet the company excluded the majority of those harms from its public reports, designing its metrics so that many of the worst encounters were never captured. The case was a big wake-up call for families, who may not yet know the extent of the horrors children have faced on the apps. Angst over Meta’s public reputation likely played a role in the decision to settle so early, experts said.

Meta is intensifying its public pressure campaign on TikTok and YouTube, running full-page advertisements in top newspapers across the US demanding its rivals make comparable efforts to strengthen social media protections for teens. Meta signed a historic settlement of as much as $18 billion with US states requiring new safety features across Instagram and Facebook, including restrictions on the amount of time teens spend on the platforms. But in an unusual twist, the deal stipulates that Meta will only pay some of the settlement unless its competitors follow suit by committing to fines and similar concessions on their own platforms. The arrangement is aimed at incentivizing industry-wide change and acknowledges that kids will simply shift their attention to other outlets if they’re restricted on Instagram. “We want to ensure teens benefit from this new industry standard, but we cannot do it alone,” according to the ads. “These protections will only be truly effective if we work with our peers—TikTok and YouTube—to put the same measures in place.”

Europe's landmark AI law has moved from an idea to enforcement. A major enforcement deadline arrived August 2. Most notably, new transparency and disclosure requirements are in effect for chatbots and AI-generated content. Europe's AI Office has not gone after any companies covered under the law for misconduct yet, but it can now request information from companies or ask for access to models. "This is a messy piece of legislation," said Patrick Van Eecke, a partner at Cooley in Brussels who advises companies on AI Act compliance. He said August 2 marked the point when ordinary users may start to encounter the impacts of the act through being notified they are seeing AI-generated material.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2026. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024


