Monday, August 25, 2025
Headlines Daily Digest
The FCC's Latest Proposal to Update Pole Attachment Rules
Don't Miss:
Life After the ACP Means Tough Choices to Stay Online
Thanks to private providers, the digital divide is closing
How Did the ‘Benefit of the Bargain’ Change West Virginia’s BEAD Plan?
Broadband Funding




State/Local





Wireless


AI









Digital Content


Ownership

Government & Communications

Stories From Abroad


When the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ended in April 2024, a well-known financial juggling act ensued. Low-income recipients, now left to pay for their internet services without assistance from the federal program, shuffled payments, negotiated discounts, haggled, and stretched their limited financial resources to remain connected, a recent AARP study showed. The study found that internet access has become deeply embedded in daily life. Participants described it as critical for everything from health and caregiving tasks to education, money making and savings, and maintaining social ties. Faced with having to cover the full financial cost of having internet access, people fought to pay for it. Some tried doing without. Two participants initially canceled their service, but soon realized it wasn’t sustainable, and they reconnected. Argy compared internet service to running water or electricity: “It’s just a necessity now,” he said. The researchers heard the clear need to maintain internet connectivity.

When Congress passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in late 2021, inflation was still “transitory,” interest rates were near zero, and tens of millions of Americans lacked access to high-speed internet. Lawmakers warned that only a massive federal investment could close the digital divide. That investment came in the form of the $42 billion Broadband Equity Access and Deployment program — the largest U.S. broadband initiative thus far. But something unexpected happened. While the program became mired in bureaucracy — subject to lengthy administrative processes and shifting eligibility rules — the private sector got to work. According to research conducted by our team at New York Law School, broadband providers have dramatically expanded high-speed access in the past few years, reaching millions of new homes and reducing the number of households without an available broadband connection by 65 percent. And they’ve done it without a single BEAD-funded project coming online. That’s a remarkable shift, and it raises a timely question: Do we still need BEAD? The short answer is yes, but not in the way many in the Biden administration originally envisioned. What was pitched as a rescue package for rural and underserved communities is now a supplement to a market that’s largely doing its job. Rather than pretend otherwise, state and federal officials should treat BEAD for what it has become: a mechanism to plug the few remaining holes in the broadband map, not reshape the market.
[Michael Santorelli is the director of the Advanced Communications Law and Policy Institute at New York Law School.]

The Supreme Court recently provided the Federal Communications Commission a sizable legal win by upholding its Universal Service Fund as constitutional. Established in 1996, the $8 billion fund is the primary coffer for its universal service programs that are aimed to expand telecommunications and broadband services to low-income families, rural areas, schools, libraries, and hospitals. Even with the Fund’s legal troubles solved, USF has simply avoided the frying pan only to jump into the fire. Why? A recent paper from the Digital Progress Institute indicates that “the current trajectory for funding universal service is unsustainable.” The report credits the fund’s current contribution base as the primary culprit, which is tied to “telecommunication services.” Worse, although originally intended to be a business-to-business exchange, USF instead acts as a pass-through tax that we consumers bear as seen as a “USF” line-item on our phone bill. So, what’s the rub? Well, USF’s contribution base is shrinking, which has increased the contribution rate to fund universal service from 11.5% in 2009 to 36% this year. That’s a problem for everyday Americans as this fee is now almost totally borne by the consumer. If driving up the costs for hardworking citizens wasn’t bad enough, it will be harder for the FCC to reach those on the wrong side of the digital divide as those select services that fund USF dry up. We need Congress to step in.
[Joel Thayer is president of the Digital Progress Institute and an attorney based in Washington. Roslyn Layton, PhD, Senior Vice President of Strand Consult and Visiting Researcher at Aalborg University Copenhagen, is an international technology expert focused on the economics, security, and geopolitics of broadband internet technology.]

States are showing fiber is still king in their plans for the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program—much to the dismay of Starlink. Starlink’s parent company SpaceX, which expected the lion’s share of BEAD money once the Trump administration axed the program’s fiber preference, has filed complaints against Louisiana and Virginia for awarding most of their funds to wireline providers. The company urged the states to re-evaluate, or it will ask NTIA to reject their final proposals. Both Louisiana and Virginia intend to dole out roughly 80% of BEAD money to fiber broadband providers, 9-10% to low earth orbit (LEO) satellite with the remaining funds going to cable and fixed wireless access (FWA). SpaceX is poised to receive a total of over $10 million ($7.7 million from LA and $3.2 million in VA) from the two states to cover underserved locations with satellite. But it claims Louisiana and Virginia violated the new BEAD rules with how they’ve interpreted the definition of a “priority broadband project.” “Virginia indicates in the Final Proposal that it determined that 95%+ of SpaceX’s initial application did not qualify [as] ‘Priority Broadband,’” SpaceX wrote. “To date, Virginia has not provided SpaceX with any information, rationale, or justification to support this determination, and has not published any studies or technical requirements used to evaluate SpaceX’s application.” As for Louisiana, SpaceX said the state “did not engage in a single technical discussion” with the company and alleged the broadband office’s guidelines intentionally excluded fixed wireless and LEO providers from winning more funds. Gigi Sohn, executive director of the American Association for Public Broadband (AAPB), finds SpaceX’s argument that it should have won more BEAD locations “absurd.”
Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority Announces Provisional Approval of Nearly $800 Million in BEAD Grants That Will Connect All Pennsylvanians with High-Speed Internet

The Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority (PBDA) Board of Directors has provisionally approved $793.4 million in Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) grants that will universally connect all Pennsylvanians to high-speed internet once fully approved by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The federal funding will connect all remaining locations across the Commonwealth that currently lack high-speed internet service. Following a seven-day public comment period which begins Aug 22 and ends at 5:00 PM (ET) on Friday, August 29, 2025, the BEAD provisional selections and final proposal will be submitted to the NTIA by September 4, 2025. The NTIA has committed to approving and disbursing the BEAD funds by the end of 2025. The final BEAD proposal is the final critical submission by states and territories to unlock their BEAD broadband deployment funding. Pennsylvania was awarded $1.16 billion in BEAD funding. The provisional grant selections outlined in the proposal include a diverse mix of technologies such as fiber, hybrid-fiber coaxial, fixed wireless, and low-Earth orbit satellite.

Governor Kathy Hochul (D-NY) announced 15 broadband infrastructure awards through the Municipal Infrastructure Program (MIP), Affordable Housing Connectivity Program (AHCP), and Deployment Program County Partnerships totaling $52.6 million. These awards will directly connect 6,900 locations across the state, including 24,000 total households, businesses, and anchor institutions, with 19,000 of those being affordable housing units, and build 234 miles of new fiber infrastructure and 46 new wireless hubs. The $52.6 million in awards will support long-term economic development across 28 counties and the internet service will improve affordability so all residents can participate in the digital economy. The broadband internet service in some cases will be as low as $10 per month and in all cases will include high-speed options below the regional average prices. These projects build on a foundation of prior investment by ConnectALL, which has previously awarded more than $13 million in AHCP grants connecting more than 12,000 affordable housing units, and $242.5 million in MIP grants bringing high-speed internet to an additional 105,000 households across the state. Funded by the US Department of Treasury, these initiatives reflect a targeted state and federal partnership that aims to accelerate progress toward universal connectivity and ensure that all New Yorkers have access to reliable, affordable internet.[much more at the link below]

On August 15, Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL) signed the Electrical Service Broadband Deployment and Access Law, which allows electric cooperatives that receive state or federal funding to improve broadband service to use existing electric easements and road rights-of-way to install the infrastructure in grant areas, subject to specific notification and compensation requirements for property owners. The bill’s purpose is to improve broadband access in unserved and underserved areas by providing electric cooperatives with more flexibility in infrastructure deployment.

On August 19, 2025, West Virginia released its revised Final Proposal for the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program. The West Virginia Office of Broadband recommends awarding $625 million in BEAD funding to deploy broadband infrastructure to 73,701 eligible locations. Of those locations, 94.2 percent would be served by fiber to the premises and 5.8 percent by low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite. In March 2025, West Virginia withdrew its original draft Final Proposal for the BEAD Program, hinting that forthcoming rules changes from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) would necessitate substantial revisions to the plan. Indeed, on June 6th, the NTIA released rule changes that fundamentally restructured the BEAD program. Since then, West Virginia, like all other states, has re-run its BEAD program under the new rules. Comparing West Virginia’s two “final” proposals reveals some key differences and demonstrates an enduring commitment to bring the best broadband infrastructure possible to all residents.
Over 13 Million Homes and Counting: Maximizing the Promise of 5G Home Internet Service with Smart Policies

Over the past few years, a quiet revolution has taken place in the U.S. home broadband market—not on the ground, but in the air. Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) delivered over 5G networks has emerged as a fast-growing alternative to traditional fixed broadband. One of the most compelling aspects of 5G FWA is its ability to deliver fast, reliable broadband without the need for physical fiber or cable infrastructure all the way to the home. This makes it an ideal solution in areas where laying last-mile fiber is cost-prohibitive, or where the only existing option is copper-based DSL. For too long, many consumers in rural, suburban, and even some urban areas, have had little or no choice when it came to internet service. With the rise of 5G FWA, that dynamic is changing. The entry of mobile operators into the home broadband market is driving new competition, expanding service coverage, and helping bring down prices for consumers.
- Mid-band spectrum is essential for delivering the speeds and capacity consumers demand for the continued growth of FWA. That’s where the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) plays a crucial role.
- Realizing this future isn’t just about spectrum. It also depends on efficient and predictable permitting processes for wireless infrastructure deployment. Critical wireless infrastructure will be needed to take full advantage of new mid-spectrum when it comes to market. As mobile operators upgrade existing cell sites and build out new infrastructure, delays in local permitting can become a serious bottleneck.
- Continued progress will require smart build policies—particularly ensuring access to spectrum, streamlining infrastructure deployment, and making sure that federal broadband programs (like the $42.5 billion BEAD program) ensure there is a place for FWA.
[Patrick Halley is President and CEO of WIA]

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the product of high-speed computer analysis of vast data sets that results in predictive guidance for users. It can be used across a wide range of industries and applications, including broadband network management; medicine and health care; writing and content creation; and customer service support. AI represents both an opportunity and challenge for rural broadband providers and the communities they serve. AI promises efficiencies and other gains but also implicates privacy, data security and labor market considerations. This paper provides rural broadband operators with a practical introduction to AI and its applied use for telecommunications and other industries in rural settings. We will explain fundamental AI concepts and terminology while highlighting specific examples of how rural ISPs and other businesses can use AI across business operations, including customer service and administrative management. At the same time, we will explore practical considerations about costs, customer perceptions and the need for thoughtful AI policies to help rural providers navigate these challenges successfully. By serving as both users and enablers of AI, rural ISPs can contribute significantly to the economic development and quality of life in the areas they serve.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2025. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024


