Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Consumers’ Research Continues Legal Attacks on USF
Emergent Connext takes on rural connectivity challenge for agriculture
Broadband Funding

Broadband Infrastructure


Digital Equity

Wireless


Ownership

Platforms






If you thought attacks on the constitutionality of the Universal Service Fund were over, think again. Consumers’ Research, Cause Based Commerce, Inc., and several individuals filed a comment with the Federal Communications Commission, urging the agency to set the USF contribution factor to zero. Despite the recent 6-3 Supreme Court ruling upholding the constitutionality of the USF’s funding mechanism, the groups argued that questions remain about other parts of the program. “Several important arguments remain for why the USF, either in whole or in part, is unlawful, including in its application by the Commission,” the groups wrote. Many of the groups’ objections stemmed from issues raised in Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent issued in the June ruling. The most forceful of these concerned Sections 254(c)(3) and 254(h)(2) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which grant the FCC authority to provide, to the extent it is technically feasible and economically reasonable, “additional services” for schools, libraries, and health care providers. These sections form the basis for USF programs, including the Rural Health Care Support Fund and the E-Rate program. Taking their cue from JusticeGorsuch, who argued that “respondents remain free…to renew their attack on the constitutionality of [the USF] for its subsection (c)(3) and (h)(2) programs,” the groups, led by Boyden Gray partner Trent McCotter, asserted that these sections are unconstitutional because they violate the intelligible-principle test.

The “last mile” is often brought up as a critical part of rural broadband. Startup Emergent Connext meanwhile is looking to bring connectivity to the “first acre,” said CEO Mike Roudi. Emergent Connext specializes in low-power wide area network Internet of Things technology, which basically transmits sensor data over long distances. The company recently landed over $5 million in additional funding to support IoT networks across six states—Arkansas, California, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri and Ohio. According to Roudi, Emergent’s tech is ideal for industries that can’t exactly “run extension cords over 2,000 acres of farmland.” While farmers may have internet access or Wi-Fi in their administrative offices, spreading that connectivity across hundreds of acres is a more complicated—and costly—story.

The GFiber team recently broke ground for fiber-internet service that aims to cover unincorporated Douglas County (CO). “We try to put our infrastructure within the entire community and then we let people know that, hey, you’re eligible for Google Fiber service,” said Alberto Garcia, GFiber’s government and community affairs manager. “Our plan is to cover as many homes as possible.” GFiber is planning to expand in several more Denver-area communities, but also in other cities and towns around the state that want to work with the company. And that’s without public funding like the Broadband, Access, Equity and Deployment program, a $42.5 billion plan to use federal money to invest in broadband infrastructure in neglected parts of the U.S. “We believe we have the resources to have deployment to a number of areas,” Garcia said. “BEAD funding may be more applicable to some of the smaller providers who can go out and say, with this money, with this resource, we can go to these other communities.”
First-level fundamentals: computer ownership is more important for internet benefits than in-home internet service

Although computers, smartphones, and internet service are essential 21st-century tools, digital equity stakeholders often focus on in-home internet service in their advocacy. Yet, few scholars have compared the associated benefits of different fundamental digital resources. In response, a cross-sectional analysis of two waves of U.S. census data revealed that computer use (laptop/desktop) was consistently a stronger predictor of beneficial internet use (e.g., job searches, government resources, and eHealth) than smartphone access or in-home internet service, and device quality explained additional model variance. Moreover, computer use without in-home internet was more beneficial than in-home internet without computer use, and in-home internet was especially important in homes with smartphones. These findings add nuance to resources and appropriation theory and the technology maintenance framework, and underscore that internet and devices are both important, requiring policies that facilitate access to both.

You probably haven’t noticed, but the press is no longer full of articles claiming that Fixed Wireless Access cellular broadband is a poor broadband choice for customers. For several years, there was a constant stream of quotes by executives of big cable companies and telcos saying that FWA was a flash in the pan that was only selling quickly because of low prices. They said that FWA performance was erratic, and cellular carriers didn’t have enough excess capacity to provide a reliable broadband connection. There were many predictions made that FWA would plateau as word of mouth spread that FWA's performance was substandard. But that plateau hasn’t happened. The recent quarterly growth of FWA has held steady for each of the three major FWA providers. Verizon recently said it has a goal of reaching 8-9 million FWA customers by 2030. T-Mobile has a more aggressive plan to reach 12 million customers by the end of 2028. The industry segment is far from running out of gas.

The dominos just keep on falling with telecommunications consolidation, with operator WideOpenWest! officially going private. Private equity firms DigitalBridge and Crestview Partners announced plans to acquire the cable company for $1.5 billion. The deal, expected to close sometime in the first quarter of 2026, aims to help WOW! continue its ongoing cable upgrades and fiber expansion. The company's board of directors unanimously approved the transaction, with Crestview being WOW!'s largest shareholder. The PE firms initially offered to buy WOW! in May 2024, and the operator at the time said it would evaluate the proposal. Headquartered in Englewood, Colorado, WOW! serves around 4.7 million copper, cable and DSL subscribers in seven states, per BroadbandNow. WOW! is also undertaking greenfield fiber deployments, and now has a total 91,100 greenfield home fiber passings, said CEO Teresa Elder.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2025. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024


