Thursday, June 10, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
President Biden wants to close the digital divide in the US. Here's what that could look like
Harold Feld: Ohio Lawsuit to Declare Google a Common Carrier Not Obviously Stupid
Broadband Infrastructure






Platforms





Privacy

Wireless


Telecom

Universal Service Fund

Content


Education


Health

Security

Company News

Broadband Infrastructure

Historically, the government has subsidized the building of broadband networks by offering incentives to private companies such as Verizon, Comcast and AT&T. But in a break from the past, Biden's proposal calls for prioritizing funding, for the first time, to community-built networks. And the plan isn't just focused on building out broadband in rural or outlying areas. Some of the most persistent examples of the digital divide can be found in dense urban neighborhoods struggling with poverty or inequality. In many of these areas, local organizations have had to step in where commercial internet providers saw little potential profit. The White House wants to support these initiatives by local governments, non-profits and cooperatives, it has said, because they provide services with "less pressure to turn profits and with a commitment to serving entire communities." Commercial internet providers have bristled at that language. Proponents have argued that by providing a public option for broadband access, cities can inject competition into markets that have been abandoned by private providers or are lacking competition.

Sioux Falls, South Dakota-based Midco is a regional service provider that serves about 400,000 customers in five states. The company is a joint venture of Comcast and Midcontinent Media and provides cable, internet (including gigabit speeds), and telephone services in the Dakotas, Minnesota and parts of Kansas and Wisconsin. Midco participated in the recent $9.2 billion Rural Digital Opportunities Fund (RDOF) reverse auction, winning several million dollars in RDOF awards to build out service within its area. While Midco does utilize both wireless and wired network (and received Connect America Fund support to build out wireless specifically in some underserved areas), “All new builds for us are now fiber, unless it’s extremely remote,” said Midco’s Chief Technology Innovation Officer Jon Pederson. As Midco considers potential areas of build-out and where to pursue funding opportunities, “We are only doing things that are adjacent to our existing fiber network. We’re not going to pick an island off in some state where we’re not. That’s been a strategy for us, and it helps us leverage the connectivity we already have,” Pederson says. “We like to use the term ‘edging out.’"
Platforms
Ohio Lawsuit to Declare Google a Common Carrier Not Obviously Stupid – But No Sure Deal Either.

The Ohio Attorney General asked an Ohio state court to declare Google a common carrier and/or public utility under the laws of Ohio and Ohio common law. The complaint is novel -- and not obviously stupid. But it has some real obstacles to overcome. As Feld has written at length before, the history of common carrier regulation goes back 500 years in the common law. All states, therefore, have their own versions of this doctrine and regulate businesses as “common carriers.” As University of Indiana Professor Barbara Cherry has written about in a number of articles and Federal Communications Commission filings, both “common carriage” and “public utility” are categories that traditionally apply based on what you do and how you behave. A state or federal statute can override the common law, of course, just as a federal or state statute can alter the common law of negligence or anything else. But absent a conflicting statute (we’ll deal with possible conflicting Ohio and federal statutes later), a state can apply its common law or statutory definition of common carrier or public utility definition to whatever business meets that definition. This includes interstate services. Traditionally, common carriers have the following qualities: they do business with the general public and treat all members of the public “indiscriminately” or “indifferently.” That means that they don’t engage in individualized contract negotiations when providing a service or limit themselves to some group like commercial customers.

If Congress passes comprehensive privacy legislation, it will need to delegate a federal agency to enforce the law and conduct rulemaking. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has used its general consumer protection authority to bring enforcement actions against companies violating user privacy, and has therefore been considered the de facto privacy agency. However, three bills have challenged this assumption and would create a new agency to enforce privacy law rather than relying on the FTC. This report compares the new agencies in three legislative proposals to one another and to the FTC. The two models—FTC or new agency—are compared on six metrics: statutory authority, budget and personnel, independence, resistance to regulatory capture, effectiveness of enforcement, and feasibility. This report seeks to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different enforcement agency approaches.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021


