Thursday, May 29, 2025
Headlines Daily Digest
FCC Commissioner Gomez Labels Trump Push to Chill Speech an ‘Administration-Wide Effort’
Don't Miss:
The plan for nationwide fiber internet might be upended for Starlink
ISPs to President Trump: Let States Move Forward Quickly with BEAD
Broadband Funding



Broadband Prices

Local

Ownership

Satellites


Censorship



Paramount Has Offered $15 Million to Settle CBS Lawsuit. Trump Wants More. | Wall Street Journal 
AI




Budget

Kids & Media

Security


For about 15 percent of US households as of 2023, the only internet options are crappy, especially in rural areas. But thanks to the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program, which aims to connect everyone in the US to high-quality, mostly fiber-based internet, that’s close to changing. Or at least, it was. The plan’s lead architect, Evan Feinman, says that before he was forced out by the Trump administration in March, three US states were just one “minor administrative step” away from connecting their first residents under BEAD. In fact, he says, they could have started the process already — if not for US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a recent Trump appointee. In March, Sec Lutnick announced a “rigorous review” of BEAD, which he claims is too “woke” and filled with “burdensome regulations.” Now the plan may change. Lutnick’s changes to BEAD could hand a lot of the program’s money over to private interests like Elon Musk’s satellite internet provider, Starlink. And for every person whose home is served by a Starlink connection, their internet will likely be slower, less reliable, and more expensive than what BEAD might have gotten them with fiber. You can think of BEAD as a modern version of the nationwide US telephone network or electrification projects. It’s been more than three years since the Biden administration established the $42.5 billion program, and so far, it hasn’t actually connected anyone to the internet — a common criticism coming from the political right. But Feinman says that’s by design. “At every step of the game, states were screaming that we were going too fast,” he said. “When we made allocation, more than a dozen states sent us letters saying, ‘Go slower, go slower, go slower.’” In fact, Feinman says, the first states would already have started construction if it wasn’t for delays by the Trump administration, which has been encouraging states to redo finished phases of the program to make more space for satellite internet. That shift, Feinman said in April, could effectively mean “millions of private capital is in the garbage.”

We are writing to thank you for your commitment to the BEAD program for rural broadband deployment. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that established the BEAD program was passed three-and-a-half years ago—and yet not a single household has been connected to high-speed internet through the program. To fulfill its long overdue mission of connecting all Americans, we urge you to both eliminate the unnecessary and burdensome program requirements imposed by the Biden Administration and enable the States to move forward quickly with implementation. Our members are the companies that have been the boots on the ground building, maintaining, and supplying the equipment for the broadband network infrastructure in rural America, and we cannot overstate the importance of getting the BEAD program on track. These rural communities have waited long enough for next-generation broadband that will unlock massive economic opportunities, and they cannot afford more program delays. The BEAD program was designed for the States to carry out, and the States should remain in the driver’s seat, empowered to use their expertise in determining the best broadband technology solutions for their residents. We recognize that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to solving rural broadband challenges and that every technology will have an important role to play in BEAD. At the same time, BEAD is a golden opportunity to drive as much fiber infrastructure as feasible into our country, which will help advance your Administration’s important connectivity, AI, and advanced manufacturing goals. We are confident that under your direction, BEAD can unleash economic opportunity for America’s rural communities, and we appreciate your leadership in moving the program forward.

Competition has been creeping into broadband pricing for the last several years as cable companies have been using low introductory rates to try to win new customers and offering similarly low price to try to keep them. However, competition might have gone into a new gear recently when Comcast began offering low rates with a five-year price guarantee. The low prices were likely prompted by the recent announcement that Comcast lost 199,000 broadband customers in the first quarter, but Comcast's competitors aren't sitting still. Verizon recently announced a 3-year lock for fixed wireless access broadband prices at $35 per month for customers who accept autopay and who also buy a Verizon cell plan. Not to be outdone, T-Mobile now offers a $35 price for FWA broadband with a 5-year guarantee for customers who have a T-Mobile cellular plan. This announcement by Comcast and the constant advertisements from the FWA providers could prove to be a watershed moment for prices in the industry. Just imagine the glee that USTelecom will have in 2026 if they can announce that prices for broadband are actually decreasing.

Over 33,000 households in Oakland are estimated not to have residential broadband internet service. Deep, active community engagement starting during the pandemic shed light on the root causes of this digital divide: Internet affordability, access, and performance are the main barriers. Meanwhile, a duopolistic marketplace has resulted in a lack of investment in broadband infrastructure, leaving many Oaklanders paying more for less while the problems persist. This is digital exclusion in Oakland, and it overwhelmingly affects low-income families and Black and brown communities. The City of Oakland’s Broadband Master Plan (BMP) serves as a blueprint for addressing digital exclusion and its impacts on Oaklanders. It presents a solution: a municipal broadband network designed to achieve more equitable access to affordable, high-speed internet. By leveraging existing public infrastructure, prioritizing un/underserved communities, and fostering partnerships with Oakland Housing Authority, other affordable housing providers, as well as community-oriented Internet service providers that can advance digital inclusion, the BMP demonstrates the potential for a Municipal Broadband Networks (MBN) in Oakland to improve outcomes in the community by managing as a utility for economic, educational, and social progress. The OaklandConnect MBN will not, on its own, solve the digital divide. As they say, this is a marathon, not a sprint. Much more work—perhaps even tougher—lies ahead. Nonetheless, the BMP provides a roadmap to a more connected, inclusive, and resilient future.

As if cable didn’t have enough problems with fiber competitors, AT&T’s $5.75 billion Lumen deal shows just how much operators have to weather from the consolidation storm. Cox, which is merging with Charter for $34.5 billion, has the biggest exposure to Lumen, said the analysts at BNP Paribas, as 36 percent of Cox’s footprint overlaps with Lumen’s legacy copper network. Lumen is selling most of its Mass Markets consumer fiber business, but it’s notably keeping its copper-based customers. When it comes to fiber, Comcast isn’t out of the line of fire. According to New Street Research, the operator has the most exposure to Lumen’s current and future fiber markets, which so far consist of nearly 1 million subscribers in 11 states. Charter, meanwhile, has a “relatively small presence” in the Lumen fiber footprint. For AT&T’s part, it plans to double its fiber passings goal to around 60 million locations by 2030, expanding its presence in the central U.S. and Pacific Northwest markets.

Eruptions from the sun are shortening the lives of satellites in Earth orbit, particularly large constellations like SpaceX’s Starlink—which could be both beneficial and a cause for concern. The sun goes through an 11-year cycle of activity, peaking with a period known as solar maximum, which most recently occurred in late 2024. During these periods, increased eruptions from the sun can create geomagnetic storms that heat our planet’s atmosphere, causing it to swell outwards in size and increasing drag on satellites. Now, Denny Oliveira at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland and his colleagues have investigated how much of an effect this was having on Starlink. “We found that when we have geomagnetic storms, satellites re-enter faster than expected [without solar activity],” he says. During solar maximum, the lifetime of a satellite could be reduced by up to 10 days, the researchers say. This effect is only becoming apparent now because of a boom in satellite launches, particularly by SpaceX.

Free speech is among the most cherished rights we enjoy as Americans. This right, legally enshrined in our constitution, has set us apart as a beacon of freedom around the world. Even as we take action to reject censorship at home, we see troubling instances of foreign governments and foreign officials picking up the slack. In some instances, foreign officials have taken flagrant censorship actions against U.S. tech companies and U.S. citizens and residents when they have no authority to do so. I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on U.S. citizens or U.S. residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on U.S. soil. It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States. We will not tolerate encroachments upon American sovereignty, especially when such encroachments undermine the exercise of our fundamental right to free speech.

Although much of the recent focus regarding the press being under siege has been on President Trump’s Federal Communications Commission, FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez cited “an administration-wide effort” involving multiple agencies intended “to chill speech” and stifle dissenting voices. With the FCC under Trump’s handpicked Chairman, Brendan Carr, Commissioner Gomez has few avenues to formally push back against the Republican majority. Because of that, she said, it’s incumbent upon her to publicly push back against what she called a “campaign of censorship and control” carried out in part through “sham investigations against broadcasters because of their editorial decisions.” Noting that President Trump had previously fired Democratic members of the Federal Trade Commission, Commissioner Gomez conceded that she doesn’t know why she’s still in her position, before adding that any attempt to remove her before her term expires would be illegal. Explaining her goal, she said, “If I get fired, it isn’t because I didn’t do my job, it’s because I insisted on doing it.” She referenced Trump’s lawsuit against “60 Minutes,” and the pressure brought to bear against its corporate parent Paramount Global, as an example of the work being done against journalists to “tone down their criticisms” of the Administration.

Dario Amodei—CEO of Anthropic, one of the world's most powerful creators of artificial intelligence—has a blunt, scary warning for the U.S. government and all of us: artificial intelligence could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs—and spike unemployment to 10-20 percent in the next one to five years. Amodei said AI companies and the government need to stop "sugar-coating" what's coming: the possible mass elimination of jobs across technology, finance, law, consulting, and other white-collar professions, especially entry-level gigs. Amodei, who's building the very technology he predicts could reorder society overnight, said he's speaking out in hopes of jarring government and fellow AI companies into preparing—and protecting—the nation. Amodei is hardly hopeless. He sees a variety of ways to mitigate the worst scenarios, including speeding up awareness, understanding, and transparency when it comes to AI.

Agentic AI has quickly become one of the most active areas of artificial intelligence development. AI agents are a level of programming on top of large language models that allow them to work towards specific goals. Perhaps the most exciting future for agentic AI will come in the form of personal agents, which can take self-directed action on your behalf. Leading companies are already offering prototype personal AI agents to their customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders, raising challenging business and technical questions. Most pointedly: Can AI agents be trusted to act in our best interests? How will we know? While there are many serious risks, there are also ways to address them. Here are three key steps to ensuring trustworthy personal AI agents, some of which is already in development:
- Treat AI Agents as Fiduciaries
- Encourage Market Enforcement of AI Agent Independence
- Keep Decisions Local
[Blair Levin is currently a Nonresident Senior Fellow with the Brookings Institution and Policy Advisor with New Street Research. Larry Downes is a co-author of Pivot to the Future: Discovering Value and Creating Growth in a Disrupted World.]

Just days after the new pope, Leo XIV, took up his position as head of the Catholic Church, he started talking about artificial intelligence. In his first speech to the press, he recognized that AI has “immense potential” but emphasized that we need to “ensure that it can be used for the good of all.” And in his first address to the cardinals, he explained that he actually chose the name Leo XIV because of AI. The name is a reference to a previous pope, Leo XIII, who held the position during the Industrial Revolution in the late 19th century, and weighed in on how rising capitalism and the new technology of the day risked turning workers into commodities. The Catholic Church, he argued, should stand up for workers’ rights and dignity. The new pope signaled that he thinks the church must once again step into that role. On the surface, AI and Catholicism might seem like a strange combination. But AI is forcing big questions about the meaning of human life, and it’s important to have spiritual thinkers weigh in on those instead of just letting technologists run the show.
Sen Murray, Rep DeLauro Call Out Trump Admin’s Lack of Transparency on Spending, Demand Detailed Agency Spend Plans Be Submitted as Required By Law

Sen Patty Murray (D-WA) and Rep Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) sent a letter to Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought calling out the Trump administration’s unacceptable failure to submit detailed spend plans for each agency to the Appropriations Committees, as the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2025 requires by law. Spend plans are critical to congressional oversight and the annual appropriations process, and have long been required by law. But, the Trump administration has failed to submit adequate spend plans to Congress—and it has even failed to submit any spend plan for some agencies. Sen Murray and Rep DeLauro wrote. "The widespread failure of departments and agencies to abide by the requirements of section 1113 is unacceptable, and the lack of transparency begs serious questions about what exactly this administration is seeking to hide from the Committees—and the American people."
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2025. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024


