Monday, April 21, 2025
Headlines Daily Digest
An Age of Extinction Is Coming. Here’s How to Survive.
Don't Miss:
Fifth Circuit Vacates FCC's Fine of AT&T in Customer Data Case
Biden’s Team Wishes They’d Moved So Much Faster
Gavin Wax, the Far-Right Activist Who Vowed “Retribution,” Lands Role at the FCC
Broadband Funding


Broadband Service

Tariffs

State/Local







Ownership/Antitrust




Platforms/Social Media/AI
The last bits of fellowship and ingenuity on the web are being swept away by a tide of so-called artificial intelligence | Financial Times 
AI as Normal Technology: An alternative to the vision of AI as a potential superintelligence | Knight First Amendment Institute 





Health



Privacy/Security









Journalism

Labor


Research

DELETE DELETE DELETE

Government & Communications




Lobbying

Industry News



Policymakers

Sample Category

The U.S. Commerce Department appears to be shooting for mid-May to announce anticipated reforms to the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment rural broadband funding program, according to Washington insider Blair Levin. In a research note, Levin said the four options under consideration include:
- Requiring states to rebid and imposing a federal high-cost threshold that would shift funds from fiber to satellite
- Requiring states to eliminate certain requirements, but allowing the results of the application process to stand with only marginal adjustments
- Setting some general rules, but having the Commerce Department review each state’s awardee lists before approving the release of funds
- Rewriting the BEAD Program rules to award all funding to satellite providers, rerunning the application process, and returning money to the Treasury
The last two options would face the strongest opposition, according to Levin. The third option would be unpopular because Republicans generally don’t like decisions to be made at the federal level, rather than the state level. And the fourth option would be seen as favoring Elon Musk, Trump’s biggest campaign contributor. Levin believes the first two options are the most likely to be selected, but adds that Commerce seems to prefer the first option.

I’ve been thinking about something that Jake Sullivan, President Joe Biden’s national security adviser, said in a post-election interview: “The president has been operating on a time horizon measured in decades, while the political cycle is measured in four years.” What we’re seeing now is that this was a false choice. There is no way to cleave the policy of the next decade from the outcome of the next election. If you lose power, your carefully constructed set of bills and international alliances can be turned to cinder by your successor. If it is true that President Biden believed he was choosing the politics of posterity over the policies Americans would feel before the election, then he chose wrong. But I don’t think it was a choice. Delay has become the default setting of American government. The 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was supposed to pump hundreds of billions into roads, bridges, rural broadband, electric vehicle chargers. By 2024, few of its projects were finished or installed. That wasn’t because the Biden team wanted to run for re-election on the backs of news releases rather than ribbon cuttings. But the administration didn’t make the changes necessary to deliver on a time frame the public could feel. Many members of Biden’s staff now bitterly regret it.
[Ezra Klein joined Opinion in 2021. Previously, he was the founder, editor in chief and then editor at large of Vox; the host of the podcast “The Ezra Klein Show”; and the author of “Why We’re Polarized.”]

Anybody who was using computers before 2000 can describe a broadband journey of how they communicated over the years. That journey mostly describes the broadband choices we each had in our neighborhood. I've had a lot of broadband products over the years, but I think the 1 Mbps DSL modem from Verizon was my favorite. It was 30 times faster than dial-up and, for the first time, I felt freed from the limits of the connection technology. At the time, that was enough speed to do anything I wanted. I’m also still nostalgic about the beeps and boops of my first modem.

Tariff confusion is through the roof right now, but fiber broadband operators and their equipment suppliers probably don’t have much to worry about, according to Dell’Oro Group VP Jeff Heynen. The most common fiber components, such as PON optical line terminals, optical networking terminals, cabinets, and fiber optic cables, "have already been self-certified by the respective vendors and have already seen substantial increases in domestic manufacturing,” Heynen noted. Many fiber vendors, like Nokia, STL, Vecima Networks and others, onshored most of their manufacturing to the U.S. to adhere to the Build America, Buy America requirement of the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program. BEAD may be going through uncertainties of its own, but that doesn’t change the fact these vendors have already set up shop stateside—a move that is massively beneficial in the current environment.

The Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity’s Michigan High-Speed Internet Office is advancing efforts to extend broadband coverage to every home, business, and community anchor institution across Michigan with the announcement of the preliminary results of the first project application period for the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program. Starting January 9 and ending on April 9, internet service providers, communities, and eligible participants had the opportunity to submit project applications to bring high-speed internet to unserved and underserved locations across Michigan. By enabling access to reliable, affordable high-speed internet, the BEAD program will unlock opportunities in education, healthcare and economic growth for more Michiganders through access to high-speed internet. The first round brought in 392 applications from 32 applicants seeking to build high-speed fiber-optic service. Their applications cover more than 193,000 homes and businesses.

The city of Baltimore (MD) is building trust and connectivity for its residents through community-centered efforts. Baltimore has made steady progress in recent years toward addressing access, including investing in digital skills training and staffing up to address the gaps. According to Kenya Asli, the city director of broadband and digital equity, this work has advanced further in the past year. It includes building out the city’s middle-mile network, which, Asli explained, lays the foundation for the city’s next project: Officials plan to release a request for proposals to invite a new internet service provider into the city market. “Folks want more options, and so we are bringing in more options,” Asli said, noting the city is lowering the barrier to entry for ISPs through this middle-mile network. Baltimore has also used $5 million to establish a grant program—the second round of funding for which invested $1.8 million in October 2024—to forge partnerships with local nonprofits and leverage existing expertise to better support the community.
Spectrum announced the launch of Spectrum Internet, Mobile, TV and Voice services to more than 6,700 homes and small businesses in Marion County (FL). Spectrum’s newly constructed fiber-optic network buildout extends services specifically to Summerfield, Citra, and Umatilla. Spectrum’s multi-year Rural Construction Initiative is driven by an approximately $7 billion private investment from Charter and will ultimately connect approximately 1.7 million new locations across the country. In addition, Spectrum has partnered with the state of Florida through the Florida Office of Broadband to continue expanding broadband access through the Broadband Opportunity Program to additional unserved homes and small businesses in Marion County and across the Sunshine State.

FOCUS Broadband announced that nearly 4,000 addresses in Chowan and Perquimans (NC) counties now have access to fiber optic high-speed internet with speeds of up to 5 Gbps, thanks to two North Carolina Department of Information Technology Growing Rural Economies with Access to Technology Grants totaling $8 million. These grants, awarded to FOCUS Broadband in late 2022, have already connected over 1,200 homes and businesses. Work is currently underway with substantial progress having already been made on two additional projects in Chowan and Perquimans counties. These projects were also funded through NCDIT’s GREAT Grant program. The grants, totaling $7.2 million, were awarded in 2023 and will expand broadband service to an additional 1,700 addresses in both counties. Completion is expected in 2025. In total, FOCUS Broadband will contribute approximately $1.7 million in matching funds to these GREAT Grant projects, with additional support provided by each county.

OpenAI wasn't mentioned once in a judge's 115-page decision against Google over its dominance of the online ad market—but the ChatGPT maker stands as a key beneficiary of this legal conflict. The rise of AI is threatening the heart of Google's search business at the same moment that the government is pressing its most sustained challenge to Big Tech power in nearly 30 years. That could open the path for a once-in-a-generation power transition in tech, with AI upstarts like OpenAI and Anthropic best positioned to seize the initiative. In previous eras of platform transition in the tech world, massive and lengthy government antitrust lawsuits distracted and hobbled industry leaders at key moments, giving new companies and industries breathing room to gain footholds and grow. It happened in the 1970s and early 1980s, when then-dominant IBM fought a grueling court battle with the U.S. while the new personal computer industry began to take off. More recently, it happened in the late 1990s, when Microsoft dueled the government in court over its dominance of the browser market, while a tiny new startup called Google began to win over web users. Now it's Google's turn in the docket.

The digital age takes embodied things and offers virtual substitutes, moving entire realms of human interaction and engagement from the physical marketplace to the computer screen. Some of these substitutes have meaningful upsides. But in many cases, the virtual substitutes are clearly inferior to what they’re replacing. But this substitution nonetheless succeeds and deepens because of the power of distraction. Even when the new forms are inferior to the older ones, they are more addictive, more immediate, easier to access — and they feel lower-risk, as well. So even though people ultimately get less out of the virtual substitutes, they still tend to come back to them and eventually depend on them. Thus under digital conditions social life attenuates, romance declines, institutions lose support, the fine arts fade and the popular arts are overrun with slop, and the basic skills and habits that our civilization took for granted — how to have an extended conversation, how to approach a woman or man with romantic interest, how to sit undistracted with a movie or a book — are transmitted only weakly to the next generation. Then, finally, as local embodied experience becomes less important than virtual alternatives, the power of substitution and distraction feeds a sense that real-world life is fundamentally obsolete. Unless the true A.I. doomsayers are correct, in the year 2100 there will still be nations, families, religions, children, marriages, great books. But how much survives will depend on our own deliberate choices — the choice to date and love and marry and procreate, the choice to fight for particular nations and traditions and art forms and worldviews, the choice to limit our exposure to the virtual, not necessarily refusing new technology but trying every day, in every setting, to make ourselves its master. Have the child. Practice the religion. Found the school. Support the local theater, the museum, the opera or concert hall, even if you can see it all on YouTube. Pick up the paintbrush, the ball, the instrument. Learn the language — even if there’s an app for it. Learn to drive, even if you think soon Waymo or Tesla will drive for you. Put up headstones, don’t just burn your dead. Sit with the child, open the book, and read.

AT&T seeks review of a Federal Communications Commission forfeiture order. In an internal proceeding, the Commission found that AT&T violated section 222 of the Telecommunications Act by mishandling customer data and fined the company $57 million. AT&T’s petition argues, among other things, that the in-house adjudication violated the Constitution by denying it an Article III decisionmaker and a jury trial. Guided by SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024), we agree with AT&T. Accordingly, we grant the petition and vacate the forfeiture order. At issue here is AT&T’s former location-based services program, which it discontinued March 2019. Location-based services give users up-todate information about their surroundings, such as maps and traffic information. They also include services from providers like Life Alert and AAA, which depend upon customers’ locations. While nothing is wrong in principle with providing location-based services, the Commission took issue with how AT&T protected its customers’ location data. To implement location-based services, AT&T contracted with “location aggregators,” who collected customers’ location data. The aggregators, in turn, sold this data to service providers like Life Alert or AAA. Before allowing those sales, however, AT&T would review a service provider’s “use case,” where the provider described why it needed the location data and how it obtained customers’ opt-in consent to use the data. (That the providers—as opposed to AT&T—obtained users’ consent would be important in the Commission’s section 222 analysis.) AT&T’s program also required providers to obtain and document customer consent for every location request. While AT&T reviewed the providers’ consent records daily, it did not verify customer consent before providing access to location data. AT&T also required aggregators to monitor providers and to comply with various security requirements, such as vulnerability scanning and encryption. At the same time, AT&T could cut off access to customer location information at any time.

A concerning development from the Trump administration has privacy advocates sounding alarm bells nationwide: a plan to consolidate data from dozens of government agencies into what would amount to a comprehensive “master file” on all American citizens. While proponents claim this massive data integration effort will help eliminate waste and fraud, the potential consequences for privacy rights, civil liberties, and national security are profound and deeply troubling. When lawmakers enacted the Privacy Act of 1974, they intentionally designed it to compartmentalize citizens’ data across agencies. This wasn’t an oversight or a technological limitation—it was a deliberate measure shaped by hard-learned lessons about government overreach. The Act established a core principle: personal information collected for one purpose shouldn’t be repurposed without consent or proper legal authority. Now is the time for citizens to understand the importance of their personal information remaining protected, compartmentalized, and used only for its intended purposes. Without this, we risk living in a surveillance state of our own making.

I’m sensing a trend within telecommunications: Operators are on a mission to clean up their company records. They’ve been limping along for years—even decades—keeping track of their business records in multiple antiquated systems. Many of them have an even bigger mess because they’ve acquired smaller companies over the years, and those companies came with different antiquated record-keeping systems, which were never fully integrated into the larger company. This is probably for a few reasons. Firstly, it’s apparent that artificial intelligence requires clean, accessible data to train new applications and keep businesses relevant in the 21st century. Having clean and organized data is also critical for future mergers & acquisitions purposes.

It looks like there are lots and lots (and lots) of federal regulations that US telecommunications industry players want to end. Some of the rules are relatively major, like a requirement that companies disclose network outages or security breaches. Others are very minor, such as a requirement to use the Federal Communications Commission's aging and complex spectrum-management database. Some rules touch on hot-button issues in the current political climate—for example, rules about tracking workforce diversity and others focusing on TV broadcaster ownership. Some of the federal rules are specifically targeted at one company, like the "C-Block Rule" that Verizon wants to eliminate. Others stretch across practically the entire sector, such as those governing the FCC's broadband maps. Taken together, it looks as if the US telecommunications industry is hoping to change or eliminate many rules under FCC Chairman Brendan Carr's new "Delete, Delete, Delete" proceeding.

The Trump administration further embraced the theory that the deadly Covid-19 pandemic emanated from a lab in China, updating the government’s main websites about the virus to detail that argument. The White House revamped the primary websites for information about Covid and for ordering virus tests, Covid.gov and Covidtests.gov, to lay out its contention that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. Under a banner titled “Lab Leak” that features an image of President Trump, the new page says that prior statements by government officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, that the virus emerged from a wild-animal market in China are false. The page says that Wuhan is home to China’s foremost research lab on the SARS virus and has “inadequate biosafety levels.” Researchers there had Covid-like symptoms before the virus was discovered at a wet market, it says. The webpage does not address other details about the early spread of the virus, like where patients lived and worked and genetic clues from an illegal wild-animal market in Wuhan where many cases were detected. Many scientists believe that information points to the virus having spilled from animals into people at the market.

When Elon Musk and President Donald Trump commanded all federal workers to submit weekly emails listing five accomplishments, they warned of harsh consequences: Failure to comply would count as a resignation. Musk called the emails an accountability measure needed to ensure staff even had a “pulse.” But officials refused to comply with core aspects of the directive from the beginning. In a briefing for top human resources officers across government held just two days after Musk’s directive went out to all federal employees on Feb. 22, the Office of Personnel Management said the initiative was voluntary and noncompliance would not be considered a resignation. Further undermining Musk’s effort, OPM leaders said in the briefing that the agency did not intend to do anything with the messages that employees did submit. As Musk prepares to exit government later in 2025 and his influence appears to wane, the conflicting messages and confusion have had a predictable result: agencies maintain an inconsistent patchwork of policies on the email responses.

To protect kids online, Mark Zuckerberg says Congress should focus on Apple and Google — not Facebook and Instagram. The Meta CEO, owner of the two social media sites, is flooding Washington with ads aimed at convincing lawmakers to require his rivals’ app stores to verify shoppers’ ages and require parental consent for kids to download social media apps. In 2024, Zuckerberg was able to convince House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to shelve a bill that would have required Facebook and Instagram to make design changes to protect kids from bullying, sexual exploitation and other online ills. If he succeeds now in convincing Republicans to target Apple and Google instead it will show how much headway he has made with the GOP majority in Congress. There is already evidence Zuckerberg is swaying the people who matter.

Speeds and pricing are still core attributes of today's home broadband services, but service providers are continuing to expand into other aspects of broadband focused on better Wi-Fi and an overall improved customer experience. AT&T's fiber platform already has speed on its side, but the operator is putting more focus on in-home Wi-Fi with the launch of a new package called "All-Fi Pro." The new package features a Wi-Fi 7 gateway, Wi-Fi extenders, and an advanced form of ActiveArmor, an Internet security service that includes a home-side VPN. All-Fi Pro also provides AT&T fiber subs with the ability to upgrade their broadband devices every three years.

As cable grapples with declining broadband subscribers and increased competition, Comcast unveiled a new pricing play that could turn the ship around for the industry, according to analysts. The operator is now offering a five-year price guarantee for new broadband customers—a plan that starts at $55/month with no annual contract required. Customers who sign up for the price guarantee will have access to unlimited data, plus they’re eligible for a free Xfinity mobile line for one year. Steve Croney, Comcast’s COO of connectivity and platforms, said in the announcement that Comcast is aiming to “[address] two significant consumer pain points—rising costs and transparency.” The move is a change long overdue for Comcast, as its existing pricing model has left the operator lacking in comparison to its competitors.

For the past six years, Gavin Wax has held court as the president of the New York Young Republican Club, a group he helped turn from a small, stodgy establishment outfit into “a vanguard of the Trump movement.” Under his leadership, the club has moved far to the right. It’s hosted events attended by white nationalists, budding foreign authoritarians, and, of course, George Santos, whose congressional campaign it endorsed before he became a convicted felon. Wax recently announced that he was stepping down as the club’s president, and now he has revealed that he will be taking a post in the Trump administration as chief of staff and advisor to Federal Communications Commissioner Nathan Simington. Wax, the 31-year-old former day trader, has long been a die-hard Trump loyalist. “Once President Trump is back in office,” Wax said at the 2023 NYYRC annual dinner, “we won’t be playing nice anymore. It will be a time for retribution. All those responsible for destroying our once-great country will be held to account after baseless years of investigations and government lies and media lies against this man.” Like Trump, Wax was once a staunch opponent of media censorship and “Big Tech,” and had called for an end to legal protections for social media companies. An online libertarian magazine Wax founded, Liberty Conservative, once devoted quite a bit of ink to trolling Trump’s new benefactor, Elon Musk. Much of that rhetoric seems to have vanished since Musk bought Twitter and most of the tech world has gotten on board in support of Trump. Now, Wax’s focus at the FCC, like Trump’s, appears to be mainstream media outlets.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2025. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024


