Thursday, March 3, 2022
Headlines Daily Digest
Today: FCC Digital Health Symposium and Votes for Gigi Sohn & Alvaro Bedoya
Don't Miss:
Percentage of broadband users consuming more than a terabyte of data per month continues to climb
A State-Sized Tsunami of Federal Funding
Biden’s tech and telecom agenda hinges on breaking the deadlocks at FCC and FTC
Broadband Use
Broadband Infrastructure
Digital Inclusion
State/Local Initiatives
Voice over Internet Protocol
Platforms
Privacy
Kids and Media
Security
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Broadband Use
The percentage of broadband users consuming more than a terabyte of data per month continues to climb, helping push average monthly consumption beyond half a terabyte for the first time in Q4 2021. The average monthly usage in Q4 hit 536.3 GB in the period, up 11.1 percent from 482.6 GB in Q4 2020. The percentage of users consuming more than 1 TB each month rose to 16% from 14 percent the year prior, while the percentage of those using more than 2 TB per month increased from 2.2 to 2.65 percent. Perhaps unsurprisingly, data consumption rose more slowly among subscribers on usage-based billing (UBB) plans than those on flat-rate billing (FRB). UBB customers consumed an average of 510.8 GB per month in Q4, while FRB subscribers gobbled up 576.0 GB. The rise in consumption was accompanied by increased adoption of higher-speed broadband tiers. In Q4 2021, 12.2 percent of customers were on a speed tier of 1 Gbps or higher, while 5.5 percent took speeds of between 500-900 Mbps and 28.5 percent took plans offering between 200-400 Mbps. Those figures compared to 8.5 percent, 3.7 and 15.8 percent, respectively in Q4 2020. Less than 10 percent of subscribers remain on tiers offering speeds below 50 Mbps.
The unprecedented stimulus funding authorized by the federal government illustrates a strong willingness to leverage taxpayer dollars to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact. A cursory look at key programs coming through the Treasury reveals that approximately $519 billion has been or will be released to address the economic, social, and infrastructural fall-out caused by the pandemic. Part of this “state-sized tsunami of federal funding” is intended to enable the expansion of broadband access to unserved and underserved populations across local, state, and tribal jurisdictions. Updates to the rules and guidance issued by the Treasury on possible broadband deployment programs further widen the potential reach and overall impact of federal support. That potential will only be reached, however, if state and local leaders can build a deep understanding of existing connectivity issues and think creatively as well as communally about how to utilize these funds. The first thing to understand is the breakdown of the stimulus funding. US Ignite provides a quick summary of how much each stimulus fund is allocated to states, territories, and local units of government, along with the broadband-related use mentioned in the Treasury’s program guidance.
If one goes by the experience of Georgia, a national leader in broadband mapping, a truth seems evident: A state must, over a lengthy period, negotiate with providers and undergo a trial-and-error technical process in order to complete a map of all the high-speed Internet coverage within its borders. The recent experience of Montana suggests broadband mapping doesn’t have to be as complicated. In less than two months, Montana was able to receive a completed initial coverage map from LightBox — the same company that sold Georgia a master address file for its groundbreaking work. According to LightBox CEO Eric Frank, his company wasn’t “super aware” of the opportunity to close the digital divide until Georgia opened its eyes to how a map can be constructed. After this realization, the company developed a turnkey solution where it provides both data and mapping to a state. So while Georgia produced its own broadband map while utilizing a data set from LightBox, Montana paid LightBox to do all the heavy technical lifting — from collecting Internet service provider data to providing a user interface for the map — and thus saved time and resources. “We were able to deliver to Montana in 45 days,” Frank said.
The Utah Broadband Center, powered by the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, has launched a statewide internet speed test campaign for Utahns to report their internet speed at home, work, or wherever they connect. In partnership with GeoPartners, a geospatial engineering firm, data from the Utah Internet Speed Test campaign will be mapped and used to identify areas of low or no access to high-speed internet. The Utah Broadband Center will use this data to guide resources to projects that increase access to high-speed internet for all Utahns and augment the state’s knowledge of internet availability across Utah. All Utahns are encouraged to go to speedtest.utah.gov to self-report their internet speed. Individuals can also identify areas with low or no service, or where access to the internet is unaffordable within this test and survey. Individuals without internet access can call the hotline at 1-435-777-TEST (8378) to report why they don’t have internet access. The Utah Internet Speed Test, which is available in English and Spanish, is secure and the results are anonymous. Data collected will include the location, internet speed, and monthly internet cost.
Voice over Internet Protocol
Public Knowledge Urges FCC To Preserve Consumer Protections for VoIP Services
Public Knowledge filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling urging the Federal Communications Commission to declare Voice over Internet Protocol as a Title II “common carrier” telecommunications service. Communications Workers of America, Center for Rural Strategies, National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, Next Century Cities, The Public Utility Law Project of New York, and The Utility Reform Network joined the filing. Congress created a broad, technology-agnostic definition of a telecommunications service in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 so that consumers using future technologies such as VoIP would still receive the same level of protection and service quality as traditional communications networks. Without this reclassification, consumers risk losing valuable protections including fair pricing, service quality standards, and reliable emergency services. Public Knowledge calls on the agency to act to ensure everyone has access to reliable, quality voice service no matter what technology provides it.
Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced an addition to the Office of Legislative Affairs and a transition of leadership in the agency’s Wireline Competition Bureau. Brian Moulton will serve as the Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs, and Trent Harkrader will lead the Wireline Competition Bureau as Chief following Kris Monteith’s retirement from federal service. The Office of Legislative Affairs is the primary liaison to Congress, providing lawmakers with information regarding FCC regulatory decisions, answers to policy questions, assistance with constituent concerns and responses to Congressional inquiries. Mr. Moulton is joining as the Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs. Previously, Mr. Moulton served as Senior Counsel to Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, advising her on education, judiciary and telecommunications matters. In that role, he supported the Senator’s work on the Broadband DATA Act and the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act, among other priorities. Mr. Harkrader will now serve as Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau. Prior to this position, Trent advised then-Acting Chairwoman on implementation of the recent Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, including its initiatives on broadband adoption and telehealth, while also continuing to serve as Deputy Bureau Chief in the Wireline Competition Bureau.
Democrats returned to power in Washington with big promises to rework the laws that govern tech giants—priorities President Biden emphasized at his first State of the Union address, with a call to boost protections for children online and expand Internet access. But implementing this ambitious tech agenda hinges on breaking partisan deadlocks at two key agencies, the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission, where tiebreaking nominations have been delayed. Democrats could come one step closer to gaining control March 3, when the Senate Commerce Committee is scheduled to vote on FCC nominee Gigi Sohn and FTC nominee Alvaro Bedoya. Both agencies with broad oversight over Silicon Valley companies, the FCC and FTC have lacked a Democratic majority for months, preventing them from moving forward with widely anticipated initiatives, like restoring open Internet regulations and crafting new competition rules. While the agencies are split, FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel and FTC Chair Lina Khan have had to negotiate compromises with Republican commissioners, who disagree with some of their key positions. Sohn, an open Internet advocate, and Bedoya, a critic of surveillance software, are among a slate of Biden nominees who have signaled the dawn of more aggressive tech and telecom regulation. But the clock is ticking on that agenda — especially as it appears increasingly likely that Republicans could regain control of Congress in the midterms and subject the agencies to tougher oversight.
Moves to restrict Kremlin disinformation after Russia's invasion of Ukraine are further splintering the global internet even as they help stem the tide of propaganda. A universal internet where every user can access the same messages and services has long been held up as a global ideal, but as democracy falters and governments limit usage, it looks to be receding out of reach. Platforms face the unenviable task of removing misinformation from pro-Russian actors while also ensuring that people can use social media to find truthful information and speak out. Social media executives have warned against the dangers of a Balkanized internet for years as many nations — including Russia, China, India, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Ethiopia and Turkey — have limited access. Tech platforms have an obvious self-interest in keeping their business doors open around the globe. They also have begun to take their civic roles more seriously. Meanwhile, authoritarian countries plow ahead with their own vision for the internet as the United States and Europe search for alignment on privacy, artificial intelligence, competition, content moderation and cybersecurity regulations. The bottom line is the global effort to limit Russian disinformation and penalize its government aims to bolster democracy, but cutting countries off from the network can also help dictators win.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2022. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2022