Daily Digest 12/28/2018 (Facebook's Rulebook for Global Political Speech)

Benton Foundation
Table of Contents

Platforms

Inside Facebook’s Secret Rulebook for Global Political Speech  |  Read below  |  Max Fisher  |  New York Times
Facebook’s Lonely Conservative Takes on a Power Position  |  Read below  |  Deepa Seetharaman  |  Wall Street Journal
How Much of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually.  |  Read below  |  Max Read  |  Op-Ed  |  New York Magazine
Analysis: A recap of stories on how Washington and Silicon Valley crashed into each other in 2018  |  Washington Post
Analysis: Tech predictions for 2019: It gets worse before it gets better  |  Washington Post
LinkedIn co-fouder Reid Hoffman apologizes for funding a group tied to disinformation in Alabama race  |  Washington Post

Internet/Broadband

2019 Outlook: Net Neutrality ‘Ping Pong’ Battle to Rage On  |  Read below  |  Jon Reid  |  Bloomberg
NTCA Rural Broadband Report: 40% of Rural Subs Subscribe to 25 Mbps Downstream  |  NTCA -- The Rural Broadband Association

Privacy/Security

Get Ready for a Privacy Law Showdown in 2019  |  Read below  |  Issie Lapowsky  |  Wired
Analysis: How Well Do the Current Federal Privacy Proposals Protect Your Privacy?  |  Public Knowledge
Huawei Had a Deal to Give Washington Redskins Fans Free Wi-Fi, Until the Government Stepped In  |  Read below  |  Stu Woo, Andrew Beaton  |  Wall Street Journal
White House Mulls New Year Executive Order to Bar Huawei, ZTE Purchases  |  Reuters

Wireless/Spectrum

2018 was the year of 5G hype. The 5G reality is yet to come  |  Washington Post
AT&T to begin upgrading existing LTE phones to ‘5G E’  |  Fierce
Global Mobile Forecast: 10 Billion Connections by 2023  |  telecompetitor
Sen Amy Klobuchar (D-MN): " I don’t understand..how you can have rural cell-phone service all over Iceland and not in north MN  |  New Yorker
Despite US crackdown, China's Huawei ships more smartphones than ever  |  Washington Post

More Stories Online

White House knocks CNN ‘attack’ over President Trump signing hats for troops  |  Hill, The
Gov Justice (R-WV), in letter to FCC Commissioner O'Rielly, says he'll introduce bill to end diversion of 911 fees  |  Williamson Daily News
NFL playoff games could go dark on Verizon and Spectrum thanks to disputes with big media companies  |  Washington Post
Chairman Response Regarding Franchise Fees on PEG Channels  |  Federal Communications Commission
FCC Funded Through January 3 as Shutdown Begins  |  Broadcasting&Cable
As digital media companies brace for change, unions try to cushion the blow  |  Vox
Opinion: Congress demands answers on AP’s relationship with Chinese state media  |  Washington Post
Today's Top Stories

Platforms

Inside Facebook’s Secret Rulebook for Global Political Speech

Max Fisher  |  New York Times

In a glass conference room at its California headquarters, Facebook is taking on the bonfires of hate and misinformation it has helped fuel across the world, one post at a time. The social network has drawn criticism for undermining democracy and for provoking bloodshed in societies small and large. But for Facebook, it’s also a business problem. The company, which makes about $5 billion in profit per quarter, has to show that it is serious about removing dangerous content. It must also continue to attract more users from more countries and try to keep them on the site longer. How can Facebook monitor billions of posts per day in over 100 languages, all without disturbing the endless expansion that is core to its business? The company’s solution: a network of workers using a maze of PowerPoint slides spelling out what’s forbidden.  The Times was provided with more than 1,400 pages from the rulebooks by an employee who said he feared that the company was exercising too much power, with too little oversight — and making too many mistakes. An examination of the files revealed numerous gaps, biases and outright errors. As Facebook employees grope for the right answers, they have allowed extremist language to flourish in some countries while censoring mainstream speech in others.

Facebook’s Lonely Conservative Takes on a Power Position

Deepa Seetharaman  |  Wall Street Journal

After more than a year of research and discussion, Facebook late in the summer of  2018 shelved a project called “Common Ground” that tried to encourage users with different political beliefs to interact in less-hostile ways. One reason: fears the proposed fix could trigger claims of bias against conservatives, apparently.  The objections were raised by Joel Kaplan, a former White House aide to George W. Bush who has emerged as Facebook’s protector against allegations of political bias—and thus one of its most powerful and controversial executives. Kaplan is Facebook’s longtime global policy chief but his remit has expanded considerably in the last two years. He has often been the decisive word internally on hot-button political issues and has wielded his influence to postpone or kill projects that risk upsetting conservatives. Kaplan now has a say in whether certain news-feed products get launched, an area that has long been the purview of Facebook’s engineers and product teams.

How Much of the Internet Is Fake? Turns Out, a Lot of It, Actually.

Max Read  |  Op-Ed  |  New York Magazine

How much of the internet is fake? Studies generally suggest that, year after year, less than 60 percent of web traffic is human; some years, according to some researchers, a healthy majority of it is bot. For a period of time in 2013, a full half of YouTube traffic was “bots masquerading as people,” a portion so high that employees feared an inflection point after which YouTube’s systems for detecting fraudulent traffic would begin to regard bot traffic as real and human traffic as fake. They called this hypothetical event “the Inversion.” 

I will remember 2018 as the year the internet passed the Inversion, not in some strict numerical sense, since bots already outnumber humans online more years than not, but in the perceptual sense. ears of metrics-driven growth, lucrative manipulative systems, and unregulated platform marketplaces, have created an environment where it makes more sense to be fake online — to be disingenuous and cynical, to lie and cheat, to misrepresent and distort — than it does to be real.

Internet/Broadband

2019 Outlook: Net Neutrality ‘Ping Pong’ Battle to Rage On

Jon Reid  |  Bloomberg

The network neutrality fight will continue playing out in federal court and the states in 2019, against the backdrop of a divided Congress that’s unlikely to settle the debate. The DC Circuit is likely to rule in Mozilla Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission in late spring or summer. The court may decide the fate of the repeal of Obama-era rules, and whether states can enact net neutrality laws in defiance of the FCC. Four states have enacted laws reinstating net neutrality protections since the FCC’s repeal. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai says the state laws are illegal.

The ruling is likely to set in motion a new round of appeals and lawsuits that could drag on for years, renewing pressure on Congress to settle the net neutrality question for good. But Republican and Democratic lawmakers disagree about how heavily to regulate ISPs. Democrats plan to use their House majority to intensify scrutiny of the FCC’s repeal through oversight hearings with FCC commissioners, rather than seeking a legislative compromise. GOP lawmakers have drafted their own proposals on net neutrality. But Democrats say they don’t go far enough to curtail the potential for ISPs to manipulate internet traffic on their networks.

Privacy/Security

Get Ready for a Privacy Law Showdown in 2019

Issie Lapowsky  |  Wired

Washington spent the better part of 2018 talking tough to tech companies and threatening a crackdown on the wanton collection, dissemination, and monetization of personal data. But all of that was just prelude. The real privacy showdown is slated for 2019. Tech giants are racing the clock to supersede California’s law with a more industry-friendly federal bill. There will likley be a point of contention between industry lobbyists and consumer rights groups like the ACLU, which argue that states should be free to pass stricter rules if a federal bill doesn't go far enough.  Another key question is how any sort of federal legislation would be enforced. In Washington, industry groups hope to leave enforcement to the Federal Trade Commission. Critics of that approach say that the FTC has too little authority to impose meaningful penalties on companies, and that it's failed to act on what authority it does have.

The task of reconciling the differences between businesses, advocacy groups, and members of Congress will likely fall to the leadership of the Senate and House Commerce Committees. Just who will run those committees is still an open question. Sen John Thune (R-SD), who serves as chair of the Senate committee, is set to step down from the role, while Sen Bill Nelson (D-FL) recently lost his reelection bid, opening up his seat as ranking member of the committee. And now that Republicans have lost the majority in the House, Democrats who have recently been critical of Big Tech will be taking the big chairs. On the House Commerce Committee, that will fall to Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ), while Rep Jerry Nadler (D-NY) is poised to lead the House Judiciary Committee.

Huawei Had a Deal to Give Washington Redskins Fans Free Wi-Fi, Until the Government Stepped In

Stu Woo, Andrew Beaton  |  Wall Street Journal

Two years after a congressional report labeled Huawei Technologies Co a national-security threat, the Chinese firm unexpectedly scored a big-name ally in Washington. It was the Redskins, the capital’s National Football League franchise. Huawei reached an agreement in 2014 to beam Wi-Fi through the suites at the team’s FedEx Field, in exchange for advertising in the stadium and during broadcasts. It was a marketing coup for a company hankering to beef up its meager US business and boost its image inside the Beltway. But the deal didn’t last long.

A government adviser read about the partnership. He knew the FedEx Field suites were a frequent haunt for lawmakers and senior officials across many agencies. So he triggered an unofficial federal complaint to the Redskins, who quietly tore up the deal. That previously unreported backroom maneuver is an example of a yearslong effort by US officials, often working outside formal channels, to blacklist the Chinese technology giant. Washington has since intensified the campaign and taken it mainstream, with Congress and federal agencies working this year to snuff out Huawei’s small US business and curtail its much bigger overseas ambition.

Submit a Story

Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.


© Benton Foundation 2018. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org


Kevin Taglang

Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Foundation
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org

Share this edition:

Benton Foundation Benton Foundation Benton Foundation

Benton Foundation

The Benton Foundation All Rights Reserved © 2018