Thursday, December 19, 2019
Headlines Daily Digest
Christopher Ali: Thoughts on Rural Broadband Subsidies for the New Decade
Don't Miss:
National Lifeline Eligibility Verifier
In a first, appeals court raises privacy questions over government searches for Americans’ emails
Universal service




Wireless




Platforms





Census

Security/Privacy






Television


Ownership

Advertising

Telecom



Labor

Policymakers

Stories From Abroad

Universal Service

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai proposed the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, or RDOF, a ten-year, $20.4 billion program designed to support broadband deployment in those rural-remote areas left behind by the private market. RDOF will go a long way in bridging the digital divide if it is spent correctly. But there are major issues with RDOF that require attention. My concern is that companies that win this public support will build networks using antiquated or untrusted tech that are only capable of 25/3 service. The communities relying on these connections will be considered “served” and ineligible for future funding. RDOF has the potential to strand rural communities with 2015-standard networks for many years to come.
[Christopher Ali is a Benton Faculty Research Fellow and Associate Professor in the Department of Media Studies, University of Virginia]

In an era where most people take mobile broadband technology for granted, one out of four Fresno County households lack any internet access whatsoever – not even a smartphone. It’s indicative of a “digital divide” that puts low-income and rural households at an economic and educational disadvantage relative to residents who have ready access to up-to-date internet technology. Nationwide, about 17 million households – or 14% of U.S. households – have no internet access. In Fresno County, it’s more than 73,600 households — roughly 25 percent. The Federal Communications Commission, through its Connect America Fund Phase II auctions, is spending $13.5 million over the next 10 years to provide broadband service to about 5,600 rural homes and businesses in Fresno, Kings, Madera, Merced and Tulare counties. In Fresno County, the FCC’s investment of about $4.1 million will cover about 1,800 homes and businesses – but that’s a relative drop in the bucket among the estimated 73,600 households that lack internet access in the county.

National Lifeline Eligibility Verifier launches in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Washington. Starting on January 22, 2020, eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) in these nine states will be required to use the National Verifier’s eligibility determination process for all consumers applying for Lifeline service and must cease using legacy eligibility processes for prospective Lifeline subscribers.

A soft launch of the National Lifeline Eligibility Verifier begins Friday, December 20, 2019 in California, Oregon, and Texas. Unlike all other states, territories, and the District of Columbia, these three states operate their own comprehensive systems, in place of the National Lifeline Accountability Database (NLAD). As a result, the Lifeline program continues to rely on these states’ systems for eliminating duplicative Lifeline support. Similarly, each of these states has its own system in place to determine subscriber eligibility for the federal Lifeline program in addition to its own state-based low-income discount program.

Makan Delrahim, the Justice Department’s antitrust chief, urged the chairman of Dish Network to enlist US senators to help win the Federal Communications Commission’s approval for the merger of Sprint and T-Mobile US, which would involve asset sales to the satellite TV provider. “Today would be a good day to have your Senator friends contact the [FCC] chairman,” Delrahim said in a text one day before the states sued to block the deal.
Platforms
FTC Grants Final Approval to Settlement with Former Cambridge Analytica CEO, App Developer over Allegations they Deceived Consumers over Collection of Facebook Data

The Federal Trade Commission has granted final approval to a settlement with the former CEO of Cambridge Analytica, LLC and an app developer who worked with the company to resolve allegations they used deceptive tactics to collect personal information from tens of millions of Facebook users for voter profiling and targeting. As part of the settlement, app developer Aleksandr Kogan and Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix are prohibited from making false or deceptive statements regarding the extent to which they collect, use, share, or sell personal information, as well as the purposes for which they collect, use, share, or sell such information. In addition, they are required to delete or destroy any personal information collected from consumers via the GSRApp and any related work product that originated from the data.

Not so long ago, the technology behind Bitcoin was seen in Silicon Valley as the best hope for challenging the enormous, centralized power of companies like Twitter and Facebook. Now, in an unexpected twist, the internet giants think that technology could help them solve their many problems. Countless entrepreneurs are working on decentralization projects, including the creator of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee. He founded Solid, which seeks to fix the problems of the centralized internet by shifting the ownership of personal data away from big companies and back toward users. But the other efforts have largely been aimed at taking down Twitter and Facebook rather than helping them solve their problems. And the two behemoths have plenty of problems, from policing their sites for toxic content to dealing with pressure from regulators who think tech companies have grown too powerful.

How will 2020 – the first online census – offer new challenges? Historically, the census has always been completed using paper forms. But in 2020, the census will be conducted primarily online for the first time. While there will still be options to respond with a paper form or via phone, most homes will receive an invitation to complete the census online. While an online census could cut costs, it also has serious implications for hard to count communities, who are often less likely to have reliable internet access and/or digital literacy skills. With new emphasis on online census participation, vulnerable populations are perhaps more at risk than ever of being undercounted, which could result in underrepresentation when districts are drawn and underallocation of resources and services.
What can local governments do to encourage online responses? Local governments are well positioned to work with stakeholders and implement programs to encourage online census responses. Local leaders should make a point of engaging with groups that are already doing work to address digital access and literacy, such as libraries. Organizations such as these often have resources in place to help, and are engaged with communities that would most benefit. Municipalities can consider working with internet service providers to make public internet access temporarily available to help individuals respond to the census online. Some nonprofits are already working to make hotspots available for this purpose. Local governments can also implement programs to make public devices, or “kiosks,” available for online census participation. Deploying internet-connected kiosks in public places across the community can help remove barriers to participating in the census online, such as access to a device or a home internet connection. Public kiosks also make it easy for people to complete the census in places that they already spend time, such as in line at the post office or in the library. Many local governments have designed creative kiosk programs in efforts to make online census participation more accessible.
Security
In a first, appeals court raises privacy questions over government searches for Americans’ emails

The government’s warrantless collection of emails and other Internet data for national security purposes is lawful, but searching that information for Americans’ communications raises constitutional privacy questions, a federal appeals court in New York ruled. At issue is an appeal by a former Brooklyn man who pleaded guilty to supporting a foreign terrorist group and now is seeking to overturn his conviction, saying the evidence against him was obtained through warrantless surveillance that violated the Fourth Amendment. The surveillance program in question, sometimes referred to as PRISM, is used by the National Security Agency to gather intelligence on foreign targets. It allows the NSA to gather data from American tech companies under court oversight but without individual warrants. The US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit is now the second appeals court to rule that this form of surveillance is lawful. But it is the first to state that querying the stored data has “important Fourth Amendment implications” — and that doing so should be seen as a separate act from collection that must be “reasonable” under the Constitution.

Huawei's Fifth Circuit challenge to a Federal Communications Commission ban against carriers using federal subsidies to buy its equipment is unlikely to succeed, attorneys and academics watching the case say. The Communications Act gives the FCC near “plenary authority” over how it disperses more than $4 billion in subsidies aimed at furthering universal access to internet and telephone services, Philip Verveer, who served as senior counselor to former Democratic FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, said. The subsidies generally go to rural carriers to expand services in remote areas. “I think at the end of this it’s very likely that the FCC prevails,” Verveer said.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2019. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2019


