Originally published: February 17, 2017
Last updated: February 17, 2017 - 11:46am
This is how the muzzling starts: not with a boot on your neck, but with the fear of one that runs so deep that you muzzle yourself. Maybe it’s the story you decide against doing because it’s liable to provoke a press-bullying president to put the power of his office behind his attempt to destroy your reputation by falsely calling your journalism “fake.” Maybe it’s the line you hold back from your script or your article because it could trigger a federal leak investigation into you and your sources (so, yeah, jail).
Or, maybe it’s the commentary you spike because you’re a publicly supported news channel and you worry it will cost your station its federal financing. In that last case, your fear would be existential — a matter of your very survival — and your motivation to self-censor could prove overwhelming. We no longer have to imagine it. We got a real-life example recently in San Antonio (TX), where a PBS station sat atop the slippery slope toward censorship and then promptly started down it.
- Clinton Campaign's 'Trump Yourself' tool calls you a loser, gives e-mail address to Clinton
- Tip for London Police Officers: Booze and Secrets Don’t Mix
- Why we need to stop freaking out about the NSA and get on with business
- How to remain secure against NSA surveillance
- The Fight to Fix Your iPhone (and Other Stuff)
- Clinton Puts Forth a Tech Plan. Trump Doesn’t.
- A Start-Up Plans to Digitize Your Postal Mail
- Congress isn't protecting you from the NSA. Here's how to do it yourself.
- On the Web's Cutting Edge, Anonymity in Name Only
- And People Wonder Why Hillary Clinton Might Not Trust The Media?
- Why TV Needs Trump
- Can the Media Recover From This Election?
- From Fiddlers To Franklin: The Showbiz Dilemma
- Donald Trump says Google proves he’s winning — and is trying to make sure he loses
- Facebook’s ‘too much, maybe, free speech’ problem