Originally published: April 5, 2017
Last updated: April 5, 2017 - 7:17pm
Until we see otherwise, we should take the Trump Federal Communications Commission at its word that it’s serious about improving the E-Rate program rather than cutting the number three federal aid to education program (like the Trump budget proposes for number one and number two). But those who propose changes must do what any 10th grader would do: their math homework. So, for this homework assignment, let’s ask four questions.
First, what would be the financial impact on rural schools?
Second, how would per-pupil allocations affect the access of rural schools to fiber?
Third, how would the proposals affect current activities?
Fourth, what kind of fiscal deficit for rural schools might be created by this change?
Reform of the E-Rate program has been a huge success for America’s schools and students. Now the people who voted against it are in charge. I hope they do their math homework while remembering their ABCs: Access Benefits Children.
- The FCC Should Preserve Broadband Access for All Schools
- Inspired by Hatch HS Student, Sen Udall Calls on FCC to Make Wi-Fi Available on School Buses
- A Misguided Criticism of E-Rate Misses Real Need: Educator PD
- 'Homework Gap,' Privacy, and Budget Cuts Top Agenda of Ed-Tech Advocates
- A Year in Review: Bringing Big Broadband to Better Education
- Updating the Federal Program That Connects Schools To The Internet
- Remarks of FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai On E-Rate Before The Federal Communications Bar Association
- Remarks of FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai at the FCC's E-Rate Modernization Workshop
- If You Reform It, They Will Come
- A Closer Look at the FCC's Ideas for Revamping the E-Rate
- E-Rate 2.0: Commissioner Rosenworcel’s Plan to Reboot National Education
- Distributing the Future; Which Children Will We Leave Behind?
- E-rate and the Lands the Information Age Forgot
- President Obama's misguided plan to connect schools to the Internet
- 2016 E-rate Trends Report