Originally published: February 17, 2017
Last updated: February 17, 2017 - 12:48pm
[Commenatary] Several misconceptions about the Open Internet rules are in circulation...this blog post is a first stab at dispelling the most problematic issues:
The Open Internet Order is not a First Amendment issue: Sen Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Public Knowledge President Gene Kimmelman all suggested that the Open Internet Order is a First Amendment issue. It is not. The First Amendment prevents the government from infringing upon freedom of speech. The Federal Communications Commission’s Open Internet Rules are not designed to curb government limits on speech, so the First Amendment rights of speakers are simply not implicated.
Repealing Title II reclassification is not the same as eliminating the Open Internet.
The Open Internet Order does not protect against higher prices.
The ultimate answer lies with Congress.
[Daniel Lyons is an associate professor at Boston College Law School]
- Comcast’s usage-based pricing memo: Much ado about nothing
- First Amendment Scholars Support Network Neutrality in Court Filing
- The First Amendment red herring in the net neutrality debate
- Network neutrality could become the biggest face-off on corporate speech since Citizens United
- Regulating interconnection: The FCC has a role to play, but it’s more limited than they’d like
- Constitutional Scholar: FCC Broadband Privacy Proposal Violates First Amendment
- The FCC’s Plan to Protect the Internet
- Newest scandal? It's pay-to-say
- Trump and the future of net neutrality: A lesson in regulatory hubris
- Network neutrality and the return of state regulators
- The FCC’s Open Internet order on the line as the Supreme Court challenges agency deference
- How should the FCC classify text messages?
- Let’s not stack the deck against consumers and innovators by rolling back the Open Internet Order
- Regulating the evolving broadband ecosystem
- Proposed FCC plan expansion raises questions: Is Internet access a right?