December 2016

Groups Want FCC's Rosenworcel Out, Then Back In

Some deregulatory groups are trying to prevent a possible "compromise" vote on the renomination of Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel of the Federal Communications Commission, suggesting instead that she leave the commission after the current congress but return during the next.

TechFreedom and the Competitive Enterprise Institute have joined with a couple of others in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to say they supported Commissioner Rosenworcel's renomination but not if it creates a deadlocked 2-2 commission. Additionally, the did not support a remonidation before FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler leaves to remove the possibility of a Republican President and a Democratic majority on the FCC. That means they want Commissioner Rosenworcel to have to leave the FCC after the lame duck but then be returned to her seat after a new chair or third Republican commissioner is seated. They say they expect Commissioner Rosenworcel to be a "constructive participant" in reforming the FCC under a Republican majority but don't want her continued presence on the commission to prevent that majority during the transition.

FCC Orders USF Overpayment Recovery and Plans Fine Totaling $76 Million

The Federal Communications Commission voted to take multiple actions against Sandwich Isles Communications, which provides phone and broadband service to customers on Hawaiian Home Lands, for violations and apparent violations related to Universal Service Fund (USF) support. As a result, the company will be required to repay over $27 million in improper payments of universal service support. In addition, following an investigation by the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau, the Commission has proposed more than $49 million in fines against the company for apparent violations of rules relating to the high-cost program.

Sandwich Isles has ongoing obligations to its customers, under both the Communications Act and Commission rules, to continue to provide interstate telecommunications services and may not discontinue service without the Commission’s express authorization.

Supreme Court rules for Samsung in smartphone fight with Apple

The Supreme Court sided with Samsung in its big-money smartphone patent fight with Apple, throwing out an appeals court ruling that said the South Korean company had to pay a $399 million penalty to its American rival for copying key iPhone designs. The justices in their 8-0 ruling sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.

The decision gives Samsung another chance to try to get back a big chunk of the money it paid Apple in December following a 2012 jury verdict that it infringed Apple's iPhone patents and mimicked its distinctive appearance in making the Galaxy and other competing devices. The court held that a patent violator does not always have to fork over its entire profits from the sales of products using stolen designs, if the designs covered only certain components and not the whole thing. The ruling followed a ferocious legal battle between the world's top two smartphone manufacturers that began in 2011 when Apple sued Samsung, asserting that its rival stole its technology and the iPhone's trademarked appearance.

Is Net Neutrality (And Everything Else) Not Dead Yet or Pining For the Fjords? Contemplating Trump’s Telecom Policy.

[Commentary] The election of Donald Trump has prompted great speculation over the direction of telecommunications policy in the near future. I have now been through two transitions where the party with the White House has controlled Congress. In neither case have things worked out as expected. Oh, I’m not going to pretend that everything will be hunky-dory in the land of telecom (at least not from my perspective).

But having won things during the Bush years (expanding unlicensed spectrum, for example), and lost things in the Obama years (net neutrality 2010), I am not prepared to lay down and die, either. Telecom policy — and particularly net neutrality, Title II and privacy — now exists in an unusual, quantum state that can best be defined with reference to Monty Python. On the one hand, I will assert that net neutrality is not dead yet. On the other hand, it may be that I am simply fooling myself that net neutrality is simply pining for the fjords when, in fact, it is deceased, passed on, has run up the curtain and joined the choir invisible.

[Harold Feld is senior vice president at Public Knowledge]