March 2016

Sprint says broadband co-pays kill Lifeline participation

Sprint urged the Federal Communications Commission to give Lifeline subscribers the option of applying the program's subsidies to either voice or broadband service, saying end-user co-pays for broadband service severely limit participation in the program. The nation's fourth-largest mobile operator provides federally subsidized Lifeline phone services under the brand Assurance Wireless, which is part of its Virgin Mobile division. The program offers a free phone, 250 local and domestic long distance voice minutes and unlimited texts to low-income users in participating states. Sprint said the annual income of an average Assurance Wireless household (including an adult and at least one child under the age of 18) is roughly $14,000. Sixty-one percent of Assurance users are temporarily unemployed or disabled, 89 percent don't have fixed-line phone service, and more than one-third had experienced an interruption in their mobile service before signing on with Assurance. Nearly 60 percent are more than 45 years old. "In short, these subscribers are severely cash-constrained and cannot readily afford out-of-pocket payments," Sprint said.

The carrier went on to say that implementing end user co-pays sharply limited participation in a recent Lifeline pilot program of broadband services. Assurance's least expensive option cost $30 upfront and had no recurring charges but only saw 526 users in its most active month. The most expensive option – which cost $50 upfront and a $20 monthly charge – had only 56 users in its most active month.

Half of those who aren’t learning about the election feel their vote doesn’t matter

About one-in-ten Americans (9%) did not learn about 2016’s presidential election in a given week from any of 11 types of sources asked about in a January Pew Research Center survey. One striking trait of this group is their lack of faith in the impact of voting. Half of this group thinks that their vote doesn’t really affect how the government runs things, notably higher than the 36% of those who learned about the election from at least one type of source. This group shows other signs of being less engaged in government affairs: Only 37% of them follow government and public affairs at least some of the time, compared with 82% of Americans who got news and information about the election. And, while 87% of those who learned about the election follow news in general at least sometimes, this is true of only 55% who did not learn about the election. Additionally, about half (54%) of those who did not learn about the election say that all news media are pretty much the same, compared with a quarter of those who learned about the election.

American adults ages 18 to 29 are more likely than any other age group to have not learned about the election. In total, 17% of them did not learn from any type of source, nearly double that of the next highest age group (though the vast majority of younger adults – 83% – did learn about the election). This corresponds to earlier research showing that younger adults tend to be more politically unengaged.