December 2015

Seven states to lose millions from Internet access tax ban

Hawaii, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas and Wisconsin are expected to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue when a permanent tax ban on Internet access closes off a loophole they have relied upon for more than a decade. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that cutting off the loophole would amount to $561 million in aggregate lost revenue for those states a year.

A temporary ban that prevents states and local governments from taxing the monthly bills that customers pay for Internet service has been around since 1998. But a handful of states have been able to get around that because of a grandfather clause that allows any tax in place before 1998 to continue. But the temporary ban is soon expected to become permanent, and it will also cut off the grandfathered clause after 2020. The National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures expressed disappointment and called on Congress “to honor state authority and preserve the revenues of those states grandfathered under the bill.” Their long-held position had been that the revenue lost from a permanent ban and the end to the grandfather clause should be made up by tying it to a more controversial proposal that would give states increased authority to tax purchases made online.

GOP Senators Grill Chairman Wheeler on Muni Broadband Efforts

Eight Republican Sens have written Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler to say they are not happy with FCC efforts to encourage municipal broadband, saying that the FCC "should not be in the business of choosing winners and losers in the competitive broadband marketplace." They pointed specifically to the FCC's decision (3-2 along party lines) to preempt state laws limiting municipal broadband, as well as funding government-owned networks through the FCC's Universal Service Fund's rural broadband experiments, and at least one FCC officials' outreach on the issue.

Internet service providers have long expressed concerns about preemption, including regarding government overbuilding and subsidizing networks that could fail and leave taxpayers holding the bag. But they also talked more generally about their concern with an FCC promoting municipal overbuilds of privately owned networks.

This is How the Ted Cruz Campaign Could Be Mining Your Facebook Data

Presidential candidate Sen Ted Cruz (R-TX) recently leaped ahead to first place in Iowa and second place behind Donald Trump in national polls. The Texas senator may have pulled ahead of the gaggle by mining data on "tens of millions of" Facebook users. The information was reportedly gathered by Cambridge Analytica, a data company working exclusively for Sen Cruz's campaign -- and was obtained largely without the knowledge of Facebook users. Cambridge Analytica recruited Cambridge University researchers to "gather detailed psychological profiles about the US electorate using a massive pool of mainly unwitting US Facebook users built with an online survey."

Cambridge Analytica compiles psychological data by culling Facebook "likes," which it uses to pair user traits with voter data. In 2014, its parent company allegedly worked with Aleksandr Kogan, a professor at Cambridge who used Amazon's crowdsourcing marketplace Mechanical Turk to amass data from a slew of Facebook profiles.The Mechanical Turk users were paid $1 in exchange for taking a survey that would grant access to their profile; this also allowed Kogan to access the profiles of their friends, which vastly increased his data set. That data was then used to construct personality models, which were based on the "big five" traits that make up what is called the OCEAN scale: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. The service Cambridge Analytica provides to politicians like Sen Cruz allows them to "use the OCEAN scale in shaping highly targeted campaign messages," according to the Guardian

Frontier to pay $150 Million to West Virginia to settle lawsuit over broadband speed

Frontier Communications will have to invest at least $150 million over the next three years to increase broadband speeds in West Virginia as part of a settlement to lawsuit filed in 2014 by the state's Attorney General Patrick Morrissey. The lawsuit accused Frontier of promising broadband speeds of up to 6 Mbps but only delivering speeds of 1.5 Mbps or lower.

Frontier has admitted to no wrongdoing but has committed to reducing its monthly rate for customers that were impacted by this to $9.99 per month, a savings of $10 to $20 per month. The reduced rate will be available until Frontier increases its network download speeds provisioned at 1.5 Mbps or lower to at least 6 Mbps. The price decreases will start Jan 25. An estimated 28,000 customers will benefit from the rate decrease in addition to any new customers provisioned at the slower speed. The rate reductions are expected to cost Frontier $6.25 million per year. Frontier estimates this will cost the company about $1.5 million per quarter in revenue.