November 2014

Local Action, State Support Needed for Municipal Broadband Expansion

[Commentary] According to the Institute for Local Self Reliance, over 400 communities in the United States have a publicly owned broadband network. But how did they get there? How did they access the poles? Where did they find existing assets? Are those assets available for anyone to use? How was the network paid for?

In some cases, these projects were made possible with support from state partners. Projects that increase broadband availability, affordability and adoption tend to occur at the local level but they need state level support. That support can come in the form of access to open networks, state rights of way, dig once policies and facilitating coordination. If you think of the Internet as a highway system, the middle mile is the highway and the on/exit ramps and the streets are the last mile. Government funded broadband build-out (by the National Telecommunications Information Administration and the US Department of Agriculture) tends to focus on middle mile construction. Owners of middle mile networks choose whether or not to make their fiber open to use by competitors. State governments that mandate their fiber be open to use by anyone (at reasonable cost based rates) can help decrease the cost of build-out, whether by for-profit companies, non-profits or governmental entities. Here are several examples of state level policies supporting local work to build out community broadband networks.

Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security in the Post-Snowden Era

The majority of adults in a new survey by the Pew Research Center feel that their privacy is being challenged along such core dimensions as the security of their personal information and their ability to retain confidentiality.

When Americans are asked what comes to mind when they hear the word “privacy,” there are patterns to their answers. As the above word cloud illustrates, they give important weight to the idea that privacy applies to personal material -- their space, their “stuff,” their solitude, and, importantly, their “rights.” Beyond the frequency of individual words, when responses are grouped into themes, the largest block of answers ties to concepts of security, safety, and protection. For many others, notions of secrecy and keeping things “hidden” are top of mind when thinking about privacy.

  • Most are aware of government efforts to monitor communications
  • Widespread concern about surveillance by government and businesses
  • There is little confidence in the security of common communications channels, and those who have heard about government surveillance programs are the least confident
  • Most say they want to do more to protect their privacy, but many believe it is not possible to be anonymous online
  • Not everyone monitors their online reputation very vigilantly, even though many assume others will check up on their digital footprints
  • Context matters as people decide whether to disclose information or not
  • Different types of information elicit different levels of sensitivity among Americans

Google calls for US to extend Privacy Act protections to EU citizens

Google called on the federal government to allow European citizens to challenge the misuse of their data by the US government in US courts, a right already enjoyed by Americans in the European Union.

The proposal would help heal rifts that have appeared between the US and Europe in the wake of surveillance revealed by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, said Google chief legal officer David Drummond. "Google and many other technology companies have urged the US to take the lead and introduce reforms that ensure government surveillance activity is clearly restricted by law, proportionate to the risks, transparent and subject to independent oversight," Drummond wrote. "Sadly, we’ve seen little serious reform to date. "

We Are All Responsible for Online Security

[Commentary] Our society has failed to keep up with technology. Security breaches, which could happen to anyone, are a wake-up call for all of us to think, and act, differently than before. Put simply, as technology changes, you and I need to change, as well.

We’re at a point where we need new life skills so we can safely and fully enjoy the benefits of the Internet. We need to prepare ourselves to use new communications technology, just like when we learn to drive. We go to driving school to improve our safety and the safety of others. Why shouldn’t we do the same when we decide to go online? Ideas like these are embodied in a growing movement known as digital citizenship. Digital citizenship represents an evolution in our norms -- the ways we think about our personal responsibility, and the ways we respect and look out for others online. This movement is gaining momentum.

[Anderson is Chief Legal Officer at AVG Technologies]

Five Ways US Airwaves Auction May Change Mobile Service

Verizon Communications and Dish are among 70 companies that can start bidding for blocks of radio airwaves tomorrow in a US auction designed to help get data to your mobile phone faster. Think of it as a chance for congested networks to add capacity to keep videos from YouTube and Netflix Inc. streaming smoothly to mobile phones and tablets. The Federal Communications Commission’s so-called Advanced Wireless Services auction is billed as the biggest spectrum sale in six years and may bring in $15 billion. We’ll find out the winners in a few weeks.

Here’s what you need to know:

  1. Consumers can get buffer-free mobile video
  2. Verizon needs spectrum the most
  3. T-Mobile has most to gain
  4. Sprint will sit this one out
  5. Dish may drive up prices

Bad government Web sites are bad for democracy

Bad government Web sites, it seems, go hand in hand with people feeling bad about being American.

Testing a sample of six federal Web sites, the research firm Forrester rated the Internal Revenue Service's the worst, and the Department of Veterans Affairs the best. But even the VA site provided a worse consumer experience than the most poorly-reviewed corporate site. The customer experience "is disastrously weak," Forrester said. Across the board, government Web sites meet the expectations of their users only 33 percent of the time, according to the report. And the worse people felt about their interaction with a government Web site, the more they felt like second-class citizens and less optimistic about the future of the United States. Forrester plans to take a look at a wide variety of federal sites, but in the meantime suggests, surprisingly, that government Web sites should not try to appear efficient. People like sites that feel like humans made them, the firm says.

The (one) simple thing fueling your social media addiction

Social media friends and followers have become the primary measure by which we judge whether our friendships, and our lives, are valuable or fulfilling. But social networking without the numbers looks less like a popularity contest … and more like actual socialization.

Why carrier Wi-Fi will make the mobile market more competitive

Progress in the creation of standards is laying the foundation for a carrier Wi-Fi market that will be worth nearly $8 billion by 2019, ABI Research predicted.

Cisco and Ruckus Wireless are the leading equipment vendors in these early days, and Alcatel-Lucent, Ericsson and Nokia are also vying for a piece of the pie. “More than 12” Next Generation Hotspot (NGH) networks are active worldwide, according to ABI, and Asia-Pacific has more installed hotspots than any other geographic market.

Parents Television Council Releases “Best and Worst TV Advertisers” List

The Parents Television Council released its annual list of “Best and Worst TV Advertisers,” which catalogues companies based on the television content they chose to underwrite with their media dollars over the past year.

Here’s how Kasich's big win cost Scripps $10 million

Gov. John Kasich's (R-OH) landslide victory probably cost Cincinnati-based E.W. Scripps Co. $10 million in revenue in 2014. His huge lead meant the candidates' ad spending wasn't nearly what it would have been in a hotly contested race.