May 2014

Apple reportedly will pay ISPs for direct network connections

It's long been rumored that Apple is building its own content delivery network (CDN), and now it appears that the company is negotiating paid interconnection deals with "some of the largest ISPs in the US" in order to deliver Apple content to consumers.

Dan Rayburn, an analyst with extensive contacts in the CDN and Internet service provider industries, reported on Apple's latest moves.

"In February I blogged about a new group formed inside of Apple in 2013, tasked with building out their own CDN to deliver Apple software updates, apps and other Apple related content," Rayburn wrote. "Since my post, Apple has been very busy with their build-out deploying a lot of boxes running Apache Traffic Server and buying a ton of transit, co-location, wavelengths and other infrastructure services. Their CDN is quickly growing, and it won’t be long before we start seeing a portion of their content getting delivered from their new CDN."

According to Rayburn, "Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Pandora, EBay, and other content owners that have already built out their own CDNs" are also paying ISPs for interconnection.

Mosaik: Verizon could face bidding restrictions across much of country in 600 MHz auction

According to new maps from Mosaik Solutions, Verizon Wireless could be subject to bidding restrictions across virtually the entire country in the Federal Communications Commission's 600 MHz auction in 2015.

Meanwhile, AT&T Mobility could face restrictions in locations across wide portions of the West and East Coasts, but not in the central part of the country.

Maps from Mosaik provide the clearest view yet as to exactly how the FCC's 600 MHz auction rules will affect the nation's two largest wireless carriers. They show that Verizon could face restrictions in virtually every state in the country. The only major places where Verizon won't face restrictions are in Southern Texas, parts of the Great Lakes and in parts of the Northwest.

AT&T, meanwhile, could be restricted from bidding in parts of California, southern Texas and large sections of the Northeast. AT&T will be free to bid on 600 MHz without restrictions across wide swaths of the Western United States.

President Obama Should Fire His FCC Chairman

[Commentary] President Barack Obama made an important promise when he first ran for president. “The Internet is perhaps the most important network in history, and we have to keep it that way,” he said in 2007.

As a senator, he had similarly called for a “neutral platform” uncontrolled by “some corporate media middleman” like Verizon or Comcast. Sen Obama, in other words, was committed to preserving network neutrality -- the notion that Internet service providers like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon have to provide fair and neutral access to all websites and applications; they can’t make small websites slow to load and give “fast lanes” to monopolies and large companies who pay extra for special treatment.

But the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Tom Wheeler, proposed a network neutrality rule that would authorize those pay-to-play fast lanes.

The President (and everyone else) seems to be overlooking one power he does have: the authority to remove FCC Chairman Wheeler from the chairmanship, promoting another commissioner to that spot and leaving Chairman Wheeler as one of the other four commissioners. In particular, both commissioners Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel, the two other Democrats on the five-person board, spoke out eloquently in official statements, criticizing Chairman Wheeler’s proposal for authorizing fast lanes and being a “network neutrality” rule in name only.

Either Commissioner Clyburn or Commissioner Rosenworcel could take over the agency, scrap Chairman Wheeler’s plan in favor of an alternative and move quickly to ensure an open Internet, thereby fulfilling the cornerstone of the Obama campaign’s tech agenda after the four-month comment period. While firing Chairman Wheeler as chairman would be an unusual move, there are at least four solid reasons the president should do it.

First, he has every right to do it. The Communications Act of 1934, the legislation that created the FCC, makes clear in Section 4(a) that the president has the power to “designate as chairman” one of the five commissioners.

Second, it’s not just that President Obama can demote Chairman Wheeler -- he also should.

Third, Wheeler’s network neutrality rule is truly bad for business, leaving small or unconnected companies with few options if Internet providers discriminate against them.

Fourth, the other two Democratic commissioners, either of whom could potentially replace Chairman Wheeler, not only seem committed to network neutrality and the rest of the Obama tech agenda, but also have the courage and competence to follow through.

[Teachout is fellow at the New America Foundation and associate law professor at Fordham Law School]

Verizon CEO says not interested in Dish, focus on online streaming

Verizon's CEO Lowell McAdam shot down rumors that the company was in potential merger talks with satellite operator Dish Network, days after rival AT&T announced plans to buy no 1. US satellite operator DirecTV.

"I know there are reports out there that we are talking to Dish. I can tell you now that is someone's fantasy. There were not, and there are not, discussions going on with Dish," McAdam told investors at the JP Morgan Global Technology, Media and Telecom Conference.

"I don't think owning a satellite company is something I'm interested in at this point," he said adding the company's focus was on over-the-top programming, meaning content utilized over a network, but not offered by a network operator.

So, What’s Next for Dish?

Dish Network currently finds itself on the outside looking in amid the deal mania taking place in the cable and telecom industries. AT&T agreed to acquire DirecTV for $49 billion, a deal that follows Comcast Corp's $45 billion agreement in February to buy Time Warner Cable, Sprint has also been forging ahead on a possible bid for T-Mobile US.

Dish, run by Chairman Charlie Ergen, is noticeably absent from those pacts. Analysts say the company, which has amassed valuable wireless airwaves, needs a partner to start putting that spectrum to use. The more that the industry consolidates without Dish getting in on the activity, the fewer options it will ultimately have when trying to make a deal.

“We’d be surprised if Charlie Ergen sat on the sideline for long,” Credit Suisse analyst Joseph Mastrogiovanni, wrote in a note. “This deal could be a catalyst that causes Dish to act sooner rather than later.”

Ergen has said that Dish wouldn’t compete for DirecTV because the price would be too high, but Mastrogiovanni said he doesn’t necessarily believe him. “We believe he could get involved,” Mastrogiovanni wrote. “If nothing else, a higher bid would force the price up on AT&T.” Still others said regulatory hurdles to such a transaction would be far harder for Dish to clear than AT&T.

Remarks of FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai at PCIA's 2014 Wireless Infrastructure Show

The mobile experience itself will change in a big way. Consumers will use the airwaves almost as seamlessly as they breathe the air. Speeds and capacities are going to have to increase significantly to meet these demands.

That’s where infrastructure comes in. Carriers are upgrading their networks to support the latest 4G technologies. They’re looking to add capacity by densifying their networks and deploying a variety of small-scale technologies, including microcells, picocells, and distributed antenna systems (or DAS).

What’s holding us back? As you know all too well, regulations can make it tough to deploy infrastructure -- tougher than being a boy named Sue. Byzantine state and local rules often make it impossible to make even minor modifications to wireless facilities. In some cases, municipalities are applying a one-size-fits-all review process. That’s why one of my priorities since I joined the FCC has been removing barriers to infrastructure investment.

So where can we start? First, I propose we make it easier to deploy small cells and DAS. We should modernize our rules and exempt DAS from our environmental processing requirements, except for those involving RF emissions. Given their size and appearance, I believe that DAS meet this standard.

Second, I propose to make clear that local moratoriums on the approval of new wireless infrastructure violate section 332(c)(7) of the Communications Act. At a minimum, the FCC should make it clear that a moratorium is not a loophole that localities can sneak through to avoid the limits of section 332(c)(7).

Third, I call on the FCC to build on its wireless facilities “shot clock”3 to further reduce delays and ease the construction of new networks. The FCC needs to bring down the gavel if a local government does not act on a wireless facilities application by the end of our shot clock deadlines. Similarly, we should clarify that our shot clock does apply to DAS.

In my view, the law is clear: Denial of eligible requests is not an option. Establishing a deemed-grant remedy with a relatively short fuse -- say, 30 days -- should be effective at keeping everyone on track.

FCC marks automated train safety progress

The Federal Communications Commission moved forward with two actions to help automatically control trains and avoid accidents. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said that the twin moves, which will help manage the rollout of the safety technology and preserve historic sites, was an important step forward for the effort.

“This agreement is an acknowledgement by the freight rail industry of the importance of environmental protection and historic preservation,” he said. The Positive Train Control system, he added, “is a transformative technology that has the power to save lives, prevent injuries, and avoid extensive property damage.”

The commission announced that it had signed a deal to allow seven freight rail companies to start testing almost 11,000 poles for the automated safety technology. In exchange, those seven railroads put together a $10 million fund to help states and tribal governments preserve cultural and historic areas.

Survey: Abuse Of Network Access Privileges Is Rampant

Agencies are more concerned about insiders leaking citizens’ and partner organizations’ information than their own general business information, according to a new survey by the Ponemon Institute.

Meanwhile, the commercial sector cares more about inappropriate disclosures of business data than customer data. Ponemon surveyed 693 industry and government information technology personnel who had high-level access to internal networks.

Overall, 59 percent, the majority of whom worked in industry, said their business information is most at risk without the right protections. Only 49 percent said client information is most in jeopardy.

Among participants employed at state, local and federal agencies, 54 percent said customer information is the most vulnerable type of information they need to protect. Roughly 42 percent of those government personnel indicated their own business information is most susceptible to leaks.

CEO: Frontier Emergency Phone Service Will Target Rural Areas, VoIP on Tap Too

Frontier Communications plans to offer a landline phone service designed for emergency use only, said Frontier CEO Maggie Wilderotter. He said Frontier is planning a residential VoIP product to be launched in the second half of 2014.

Frontier’s planned emergency phone service targets rural areas, which represent a large portion of Frontier’s customer base.

Like all local phone companies, Frontier is seeing customers canceling landline service and moving to cellular or other alternatives. But as Wilderotter noted, rural areas experience frequent power outages. And because traditional phone service is powered from the phone company’s central office, it could provide a reliable communications method even during an extended outage.

Frontier believes there is a market for an emergency landline phone, which would be capable only of dialing Frontier or a 911 operator. The service will have “four nines” reliability, Wilderotter said, using telecom jargon for a service that is available 99.99% of the time.

What The Netflix Of The Future Might Look Like

Netflix’s streaming service's chief product officer, Neil Hunt, hinted at what the Netflix of the Future might look like. "Our vision is, you won't see a grid and you won't see a sea of titles," said Hunt.

It won't be able to magically pick the perfect movie for you. But there is a "powerful possibility" that future versions will present viewers with just three or four manageable choices at a time.