June 2013

Online college course experiment reveals hidden costs

About two weeks into San Jose State's online education experiment at an Oakland charter school, it became clear that something was wrong. Some of the students in the college's for-credit math courses weren't even logging on. It turned out some of the low-income teens didn't have computers and high-speed Internet connections at home that the online course required. Many needed personal attention to make it through.

The final results aren't in yet, but the experiment exposed some challenges to the promise of a low-cost online education. And it showed there is still a divide between technology-driven educators and the low-income, first-generation college hopefuls they are trying to reach. To make it work, the institute had to issue laptops to students, set aside class time for them to focus on the online course, and assign teachers to make sure they stayed on task.

Google’s Washington Insider

Susan Molinari, Google’s chief Washington lobbyist, has vowed never to let Washington surprise Google.

A brassy, well-connected New York Republican who served seven years in the House, Molinari is paid handsomely to broaden the tech giant’s support beyond Silicon Valley Democrats and to lavish money and attention on selected Republicans. (Google employees gave 90 percent of their political donations to President Obama last year.) If she needs motivation, it occasionally comes from Microsoft, where the former Clinton operative Mark Penn oversaw an ad campaign portraying Google as a nefarious invader of privacy, which helped to keep the pressure on regulators to hold Google under the microscope. To fight off the now constant scrutiny of Google as a behemoth monopoly that reaches far into people’s personal lives, Molinari has aggressively courted lawmakers and federal regulators as she has managed a Google effort that spent a record $18.2 million on lobbying in 2012. The company that once had no use for Washington is now the eighth-biggest spender on lobbying in the capital, ahead of not only Microsoft but also mainstays like Lockheed Martin.

A Battle Over Broadcast

A Q&A with Barry Diller.

Over the course of his long career, he has jumped from movies to television, to cable and finally to the Web. Now he is backing a company, Aereo Inc., that wants to sell access to broadcast television on the Web—though a digital antenna—for a fraction of what cable charges. Broadcast networks, claiming copyright infringement, oppose what Aereo is doing. Some cable executives, including CNN Worldwide President Jeff Zucker, don't exactly approve, either. All Things Digital's Walt Mossberg sat down with both men to talk about Aereo, CNN and the future of television and the Web. Here are edited excerpts of their discussion.

Board of Directors

Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Monday, June 3, 2013
1:00 – 3:00pm ET
http://www.cpb.org/pressroom/release.php?prn=1029

On the draft agenda:

  • Approval of Public Session Minutes
  • President’s Report to the Board
  • Legislative Update
  • Discussion of FY 2014 Preliminary Operating Budget
  • Discussion of Strategic Priorities for FY 2014 Business Plan
  • Spectrum Update
  • Approval of Executive Session Minutes (executive session)
  • Personnel Matters (executive session)
  • Future Agenda Items


Federal Communications Commission
Thursday, June 13, 2013
1:00 pm to 4:00 pm
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2013/db0530/DA-1...

The meeting will review progress on work proposals made at the TAC’s inaugural meeting for the year on March 11, 2013.



Glass Ceiling Shattered at FCC: The Clyburn Chairmanship Begins

[Commentary] On July 11, 1934, Eugene O. Sykes became the first chairman of the Federal Communications Commission. He held the post until March 8, 1935 when Anning S. Prall rose to be chair. Since then, each succeeding FCC chair has been a man – that is, until May 20, 2013, when Mignon Clyburn became the Acting Chairwoman of the commission. Chairwoman Clyburn becomes the third FCC chair of the Obama presidency after Acting Chairman Michael Copps and Julius Genachowski. The “glass ceiling” is a concept that betrays America’s most cherished principles. It is the unseen, yet unbreachable barrier that keeps minorities and women from rising to positions of leadership, regardless of their qualifications or achievements. Sadly, it took nearly 79 years for a woman to become chair of the FCC and this first chairwoman has "Acting" in front of her title. Nevertheless, the move suggests progress and we are excited to track Chairwoman Clyburn’s record.

Broadband cord cutters? If this is a thing, ISPs, regulators and Silicon Valley have utterly failed

[Commentary] The story in the Wall Street Journal on the one percent of people who have reportedly cut their wireline broadband subscriptions to use wireless instead is a hot mess that requires some careful rebuttal.

But first, that the Wall Street Journal is even writing about this issue at all, as a possible “thing,” and doing so without directly citing the high cost of wired broadband until the fifth paragraph is rage-inducing. The WSJ minces around the cost issue by distracting readers with the chimera of more Wi-Fi hotspots and better cellular coverage as the reason people are cutting the wireline cord. But its examples show cost is the issue for most people. And if cost is the primary reason people are electing to ditch their wireline service we have two problems: One, wireline broadband costs too much, and the second is wireline can’t convincingly differentiate its value from the current LTE-wireless offerings.

ISS Backs Sprint’s Deal With SoftBank

The biggest of the proxy advisory firms, Institutional Shareholder Services, lent its support to Sprint Nextel‘s proposed sale to SoftBank of Japan, amid ongoing criticism of the deal by investors and a rival bid by Dish Network.

In its report, I.S.S. found that SoftBank’s offer fairly valued Sprint and provided much-needed capital that would help the wireless provider expand its network and turn around its long-struggling fortunes. “Given the strategic merits of the SoftBank transaction, the sales and negotiation process overseen by the board, the strength of the valuation relative to precedent transactions, and the market reaction, a vote for the transaction is warranted,” I.S.S. wrote. The recommendation by I.S.S. may influence many of the institutional investors that own shares in Sprint ahead of a scheduled meeting on June 12.

SoftBank-Sprint Deal Opposed by Investor Adviser Egan-Jones

SoftBank’s bid for Sprint Nextel is now opposed by shareholder-advisory firm Egan-Jones Ratings Co., which reversed its position as Dish Network’s counterbid gained momentum.

SoftBank will probably improve its $20.1 billion takeover offer for Sprint, Egan-Jones said in a report to clients. Because of those elements, “it would be unwise at this time for the company’s shareholders to approve the merger agreement with SoftBank in its current form,” the Haverford, Pennsylvania-based firm said. The change of heart is a setback for Tokyo-based SoftBank, which has said its won’t raise its bid for Sprint because it’s already better for investors than Dish’s offer. While Egan-Jones originally endorsed the SoftBank bid last week, Sprint agreed May 20 to allow Dish access to private financial data, giving Dish information to build a stronger case for its own $25.5 billion proposal.

Why Big Data Is Not Truth

The word “data” connotes fixed numbers inside hard grids of information, and as a result, it is easily mistaken for fact. But including bad product introductions and wars, we have many examples of bad data causing big mistakes. Big Data raises bigger issues. The term suggests assembling many facts to create greater, previously unseen truths. It suggests the certainty of math. That promise of certainty has been a hallmark of the technology industry for decades. With Big Data, however, there are even more hazards, some human and some inherent in the technology.

Kate Crawford, a researcher at Microsoft Research, calls the problem “Big Data fundamentalism — the idea with larger data sets, we get closer to objective truth.” She identified “six myths of Big Data”: Myth 1: Big Data is New. Myth 2: Big Data Is Objective. Myth 3: Big Data Doesn’t Discriminate. Myth 4: Big Data Makes Cities Smart. Myth 5: Big Data Is Anonymous. Myth 6: You Can Opt Out.