Judge tosses Oracle's $6.1 billion damage estimate in claim against Google
A federal judge rejected an Oracle expert's report estimating damages of up to $6.1 billion in a closely watched lawsuit over Oracle's claim that Google infringed on its patents. But in his ruling, U.S. District Judge William Alsup gave Oracle a chance to revise its estimate.
He also sided with Oracle on several other points in the high-stakes case, which is set for trial this fall. Oracle contends that Google's popular Android operating system was created by infringing patents for the Java programming tools that Oracle acquired when it bought Sun Microsystems last year. The lawsuit is one of several disputes that have arisen recently between tech companies battling over their share of profits from the growing market for smartphones, tablets and other mobile computing gadgets. Judge Alsup said in a written opinion that Oracle's expert, Boston University professor Iain Cockburn, "overreached in many ways" by using a broad estimate of Android's value, rather than the portion of Android that may be tied to the patents in question, to produce an estimate of what Google potentially owes in the case.