AT&T's proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA will lead to lower prices "adjusted for quality," AT&T said in a new filing to the Federal Communications Commission that is aimed at bolstering its case that the deal should be approved.
The filing is based on new economic analysis of the potential impacts of the deal, and the FCC has halted its 180-day review "shot clock" so that it can analyze the data and allow third parties to comment. AT&T said that the deal "will relieve significant capacity restraints faced by both companies and lead to improved service quality." The new economic analysis focused on "the likely output and price effects of the proposed transaction, focusing on the extent to which the efficiencies of the proposed transaction will result in lower marginal costs of output and higher quality levels." The filing itself, which looks at the deal's potential impact on 15 U.S. markets, including Los Angeles, New York and Washington (DC), is confidential and filed under seal. The letter has some parts redacted. "In each market, the merger simulations project that industry output will rise and average price adjusted for quality will fall as a result of the transaction," AT&T and T-Mobile parent Deutsche Telekom said in the letter.
Sprint Nextel, the most outspoken critic of the deal, blasted AT&T's new filing as an attempt to "distract regulators."
Free Press Research Director S. Derek Turner said, "New models or not, this is the same bad deal for American consumers, workers and businesses. After failing to make a credible case in the first go-round, AT&T is desperately trying a do-over. Yet while AT&T is spinning, support for the merger continues to unravel, from Capitol Hill to California. AT&T is asking the FCC for a do-over because its case for the merger was obliterated by the evidence. Free Press and others have demonstrated time and again before the FCC that both of AT&T's central claims — that the merger will lead to greater rural buildout and improved quality — are nothing more than a facade. AT&T could accomplish both of these goals without this merger and without killing off a major competitor."
"It is clear that AT&T’s submission of a new justification for taking over T-Mobile is exactly like the coach of a losing team calling time out so he can work the referees," said Public Knowledge President Gigi Sohn. "While the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) stops its merger review process to examine the new plan, AT&T will use the time to spend more millions of dollars lobbying federal, state and local officials and recruiting non-governmental groups to support what is clearly a failing action. Unless this new ‘model’ can come up with a different answer to the problem of 4-1=3, (which would inevitably be followed by 3-1=2) we’re not interested. Removing a major competitor from the national wireless market still makes no sense."