October 2010

Silicon Valley gains jobs year over year for the first time in almost two years

For the first time in nearly two years, Silicon Valley in September had more jobs than at the same time in the previous year, a potential turning point for the local economy.

Even as the new monthly jobs data released Friday by the state Employment Development Department portrayed the California economy as still mired in a deep jobs recession, a boost in hiring at large valley tech companies like Google, Apple and Facebook, along with continued gains in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, means those sectors of the local economy have shown consistent strength for several months. Silicon Valley, particularly Santa Clara County and -- to a lesser degree -- San Mateo County, was a standout performer in a state where the new employment data showed continued job losses in the Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, Oakland and Riverside-San Bernardino metro areas. The EDD said the state lost 63,600 jobs over the past month and has 43,700 fewer jobs than in September 2009.

Online Spats Mean less Free TV On Web

Broadcasters took a big step toward eliminating free TV shows on the Web after they blocked access to their programming online this month to enforce their demands to be paid.

Recent actions by Fox, ABC, NBC and CBS in two separate fee disputes suggest that after a few years of experimenting with free, ad-supported viewing, broadcasters believe they can make more money from cable TV providers if they hold back some programming online. That could mean new limits on online viewing are coming: Broadcasters might make fewer of their shows available to begin with, or delay when they become available -- say, a month after an episode is broadcast, rather than the few hours it typically takes now. It would make it tougher for viewers to drop their cable TV subscriptions and watch shows online instead. If cable and satellite TV providers can hang on to more subscribers, broadcasters can then demand more money from them to carry their stations on the lineups.

NPR vs. Fox News: Juan Williams firing reveals deeper media fight

National Public radio's firing of news analyst Juan Williams couldn't come at a worse time for public radio. Not only did it occur in the midst of on-air fund-raising by many public radio stations, it also happened just as controversial figures connected to NPR and Fox News -- liberal philanthropist George Soros and conservative commentator Glenn Beck -- are engaged in a harsh rhetorical fight.

Fox News is Mr. Williams' other employer and the place where he made his controversial statement about Muslims. Mr. Soros recently donated $1.8 million to NPR, seen by conservative critics (and certainly by Mr. Beck) as proof (a) that NPR is a liberal mouthpiece and (b) that billionaire Soros pressured NPR to get rid of Williams. "Up until then, opinions by NPR correspondents and analysts had been expressed in abundance, but Williams' statement on Fox, because it was expressed on Fox, amounted to apostasy," editorializes Investor's Business Daily. "The firing sends a message that Fox is beyond the pale and must be silenced." The fall-out from William's dismissal has been sharp and swift, and it's likely to continue.

White House Council Launches Interagency Subcommittee on Privacy & Internet Policy

As part of the Obama Administration's commitment to promoting the vast economic opportunity of the Internet and protecting individual privacy, the National Science and Technology Council has launched a new Subcommittee on Privacy and Internet Policy.

Populated by representatives from more than a dozen Departments, agencies and Federal offices, and co-chaired by the two of us, the subcommittee will develop principles and strategic directions with the goal of fostering consensus in legislative, regulatory, and international Internet policy realms. The public policy direction developed by the Subcommittee will be closely synchronized to privacy practices in federal Departments and agencies, resulting in a comprehensive and forward-looking commitment to a common set of Internet policy principles across government. These core principles include facilitating transparency, promoting cooperation, empowering individuals to make informed and intelligent choices, strengthening multi-stakeholder governance models, and building trust in online environments.

At the same time, the Subcommittee will work closely with private stakeholders to identify Internet policy principles that promote innovation and economic expansion, while also protecting the rule of law and individual privacy. Throughout this process, the Subcommittee will endeavor to strike the appropriate balance between the privacy expectations of consumers and the needs of industry, law enforcement and other public-safety governmental entities, and other Internet stakeholders.

The Subcommittee is made up of representatives from the following Federal agencies:

  • Department of Commerce (Co-Chair)
  • Department of Justice (Co-Chair)
  • Department of Education
  • Department of Energy
  • Department of Health and Human Services
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Department of State
  • Department of Transportation
  • Department of the Treasury
  • Small Business Administration
  • Other departments and agencies designated by the co-chairs. Of note, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission will be invited to participate.

The following organizations in the Executive Office of the President shall also be represented on the Subcommittee:

  • Domestic Policy Council
  • National Economic Council
  • National Security Council and National Security Staff
  • Office of Management and Budget
  • Office of Science and Technology Policy
  • United States Trade Representative
  • Office of the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator
  • National Security Staff Cybersecurity Directorate

A Web Pioneer Profiles Users by Name

In the weeks before the New Hampshire primary last month, Linda Twombly of Nashua says she was peppered with online ads for Republican Senate hopeful Jim Bender. It was no accident. An online tracking company called RapLeaf Inc. had correctly identified her as a conservative who is interested in Republican politics, has an interest in the Bible and contributes to political and environmental causes. Mrs. Twombly's profile is part of RapLeaf's rich trove of data, garnered from a variety of sources and which both political parties have tapped.

RapLeaf knows even more about Mrs. Twombly and millions of other Americans: their real names and email addresses. This makes RapLeaf a rare breed. Rival tracking companies also gather minute detail on individual Americans: They know a tremendous amount about what you do. But most trackers either can't or won't keep the ultimate piece of personal information -- your name -- in their databases. The industry often cites this layer of anonymity as a reason online tracking shouldn't be considered intrusive. RapLeaf says it never discloses people's names to clients for online advertising. But possessing real names means RapLeaf can build extraordinarily intimate databases on people by tapping voter-registration files, shopping histories, social-networking activities and real estate records, among other things.

Google faces fresh Street View inquiry in UK

Data protection officials in the UK are re-opening their investigation into Google after the search group admitted its Street View cars had captured complete emails and passwords from domestic WiFi networks.

The Information Commissioner's Office cleared Google of breaching the data protection act in May, after examining a sample of the Street View data. Google said it accidentally collected "fragments" of information travelling over unsecured wireless networks. But regulators in Canada and Spain have accused Google of breaking local laws. Facing such responses, Google said on Friday that it had collected more complete personal data than it had initially realized. "It's clear from those [regulators'] inspections that while most of the data is fragmentary, in some instances entire emails and URLs were captured, as well as passwords," wrote Alan Eustace, Google's senior vice president of engineering and research in a blogpost. In response to this, the ICO said on Sunday that it would ask Google if emails and passwords were collected in the UK too.

Tools for maintaining privacy on the Web

Virtually everything you do online is scrutinized by search engines and advertising networks that evaluate you as a potential customer based on what you search for, the sites you visit and the ads you see -- whether you click on those ads or not.

"It's as though every time you pick up a magazine or a book or you browse a storefront, you might be reading the magazine, but it's reading you back, and the ads in the magazine are reading you," said Peter Eckersley, senior staff technologist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties organization that monitors the online world. Marketers argue that "behavioral advertising" -- which serves up ads based on a person's browsing history and demographics -- is good because it produces ads that fit a person's interests. But privacy advocates like Eckersley say the "ubiquitous surveillance" violates "a fundamental civil liberty" -- the right to read in private. Another threat, he said, is that someone else could get hold of your data. So if everything on the Web has eyes, how do you draw the shades? Many relatively simple tools, including a suite of privacy tools offered by Google, industry groups like the Network Advertising Initiative and privacy groups like the EFF allow anyone to protect the privacy of a search, to see who is tracking your online browsing, and even to block that tracking.

Parents Television Council Is on the Defensive

The Parents Television Council spent most of the last decade as a conservative superstar in the culture wars. By pressuring the Federal Communications Commission to crack down on racy programming, the council was responsible for record-setting fines against media giants like CBS and the News Corporation. But the organization now finds itself damaged, defanged by court challenges to the FCC's hard-line position, by its own dwindling finances and by internal troubles that resulted in its accusing a former senior employee of extortion.

Meanwhile, the entertainment industry -- once so afraid of the council's wrath that Fox blurred the naked behind of an animated character -- is pushing the boundaries of taste with renewed intensity. Forget cartoon nudity. One of CBS's new fall sitcoms is called "$#*! My Dad Says." A catchy song with a highly vulgar title and chorus by the Warner Music Group singer Cee Lo Green has burned up the Web. Miley Cyrus, the 17-year-old Disney star, writhes on a bed in black underwear in her new music video. The council has tried to focus public indignation on such programming, but the efforts have mostly failed to gain serious traction.

New Library Technologies Dispense With Librarians

Faced with layoffs and budget cuts, or simply looking for ways to expand their reach, libraries around the country are replacing traditional, full-service institutions with devices and approaches that may be redefining what it means to have a library.

Some library directors worry that such machines are the first step toward a future in which the physical library -- along with its reference staffs and children's programs -- fades from existence. Robo-libraries are still a relatively rare sight. Public Information Kiosk, a company that sells kiosks and vending machines to libraries, has had 25 orders for a book-and-DVD-dispensing machine that the company introduced last year. Fred Goodman, the company's chief executive, estimated that, overall, there are no more than a few dozen vending machines now in operation. Still, he expects to sell at least twice as many units in 2011.

Press Freedom Index 2010: U.S. ranks No. 20, Eritrea worst

Reporters Without Borders, the journalism watchdog group, released its Press Freedom Index for 2010, tracking media freedom across 178 countries. The report measures the violations of press freedom in the world, taking into account murders, imprisonment, physical attacks and threats as well as censorship, confiscation, searches and harassment.

The United States remained in the same position as it occupied last year: No. 20 on the list, behind most of the Northern European countries, New Zealand, Japan and Estonia. Although Europe does have 13 countries in the top 20, 14 countries in the E.U. rated much lower in the rankings. The announcement made it clear that economic development does not ensure press freedom. Despite similar economic growth, Brazil and India vastly differed in media rights. Brazil rose 12 places in the past year to No. 58, while India fell 17 places to No. 122. The 10 worst countries for journalism are Rwanda, Yemen, China, Sudan, Syria, Burma, Iran, Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea. These countries are "marked by persecution of the media and a complete lack of news and information," the report reads.