Senators ramp up cyberwar rhetoric
Warnings about cyberwar, especially in the wake of the China-based attacks against Google and more than 30 other high-tech companies, is unnecessary overhyping of what's going on, some experts say.
One of them is noted security researcher Marcus Ranum, chief security officer at Tenable Network Security Inc. In an opinion piece in U.S. News and World Report earlier this week, Ranum warned that the cyberwar rhetoric is scarier than actual war. "Suddenly, the steady drumbeat of computer/network security has been pushed to center stage, and now our government is talking about 'cyberwar' and pointing a finger at China," Ranum wrote. "Unless you've been asleep for a decade, you ought to be worried when our government starts using the rhetoric of warfare -- especially vocabulary like 'preemptive' and 'deterrence.'" Ranum said that concerns about catastrophic economic losses and social havoc stemming from a cyberwar are misplaced. "When some cyberwar pundit starts talking hellfire and damnation, you need to ask them whether their scenario is going to have the physical and psychological impact of a New Orleans flood or a 9/11," Ranum said in e-mailed comments to ComputerWorld. The types of disruptions that some people claim cyberwar will cause, such as large-scale power blackouts, are unlikely to result in the kind of mayhem that is being assumed, he said. Many "experience power failures sometimes lasting days -- because of winter weather -- and we don't dissolve into chaos," he said.