The Antitrust Anachronism
[Commentary] The Sherman Act and later antitrust laws were supposed to protect consumer interests. That's not so easy when regulators have to deal with industries as different as oil, with its cartels and long product cycles, and technology, where fast change is a constant necessity for survival. The result: It could be months before the government approves or vetoes last week's deal between Yahoo and Microsoft to team up on search, undertaken as an effort to create a real alternative to the dominant Google. The bottom line is that by the time regulators can assess a technology market, the market has often moved on. The antitrust laws are anachronisms when applied to industries of constant innovation. Even theories about the role of antitrust were designed for the industrial era. Instead of more aggressive enforcement of a legal relic, the real question is when will technology's ever faster cycles of creative destruction spell the end of antitrust law? Consumers benefit from competition, innovation and new technology, which regulation cannot provide but can suppress. Instead of using 19th-century tools for this century's challenges, President Obama should tell his regulators to study the humility of technologists who understand that today's leader can be tomorrow's laggard.