Communications-related Headlines for 11/12/99
BROADBAND
Speech: Deploying Broadband More Broadly (FCC)
AT&T and Partners Pressure Excite At Home for Improvement (WSJ)
INTERNET
Cyberspace a 'Public Accommodation?' (NYT)
In E-Politics, Clinton's Ex-Adviser Still Plays by His Rules (NYT)
Election Panel Clears a Use of Web Sites by Campaigns (NYT)
Two Start-Ups Plan to Market Unsold Radio Time on the Web (WSJ)
Small Firm Offers to Process Tax Returns Free on Internet (NYT)
REGULATION
Speech: Blazing A Trail: A Vision for the Twenty-First Century (FCC)
ANTITRUST
New Legal Guns Train On Microsoft (WP)
BROADBAND
SPEECH: DEPLOYING BROADBAND MORE BROADLY
Issue: Broadband/Digital Divide
Commissioner Tristani's Remarks at the New Mexico Communications Network
Symposium: Com Tristani focused on "developing a communications policy that
will foster deployment of broadband technology beyond major urban centers
and into America's smaller cities and rural areas. We all know that there is
no generic formula to introduce broadband into every county and every town.
There is one necessary ingredient, however. Federal, state and local
government, rural citizens and businesses, and industry can identify
policies and incentives to ensure the deployment of broadband. Together, we
can overcome the obstacles to deploying broadband throughout America."
[SOURCE: FCC]
(http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Tristani/spgt919.html)
AT&T AND PARTNERS PRESSURE EXCITE AT HOME FOR IMPROVEMENT
Issue: Broadband
Last week at a briefing in Denver, AT&T said it and its other cable partners
are pressuring Excite At Home to do a better job of meeting demand for
high-speed Internet-access service. AT&T executives said Excite's
performance was the dominant subject of a recent meeting of the ISP and its
various cable-TV backers. AT&T is hoping to pressure Excite into lifting its
performance by voicing concerns about the quality and pace of field
installation, customer support and the maintenance of the critical backbone
network by Excite At Home. Tony Werner, chief technology officer of AT&T's
Broadband & Internet unit, said, "They have to get to the point where they
can meet 100% of demand." Excite At Home has also been at the center of an
internal debate over the terms of allowing other Internet companies on the
service. Excite At Home President George Bell said, "We are very glad to see
AT&T focusing on the Internet-access business, and their ambitions are very
gratifying to us, since the level of growth we have sustained and the
consumer demand we face is something we are working to meet all the time. We
all walked away from there with more precise planning to make sure all of us
can meet the capacity demands." AT&T needs to resolve Excite's capacity
problems quickly to sign up all the customers that want the high speed
service -- but AT&T is somewhat limited in its leverage with Excite, which
has binding service contracts with AT&T and its other cable backers until
2002.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, (B5), AUTHOR: Rebecca Blumenstein, Leslie
Cauley and Kara Swisher]
(http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB94237521592728514.htm)
INTERNET
CYBERSPACE A 'PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION?'
Issue: Access
In a law suit filed last week, the National Federation of the Blind
(http://www.nfb.org) is
charging that America Online is largely unusable by the blind, but should be
fully accessible under the public accommodation provisions of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990. The Act generally requires employers, state
and local governments and places of public accommodation to offer reasonable
services or tools to insure that people with disabilities are not
discriminated against. The suit against AOL raises the question of whether
an Internet service is
considered a place of 'public accommodation,' even though it is not a
physical structure like a store. In a 1994 case against a private
association that operated a health plan, a court concluded that an insurer
who provides services over the telephone or by mail could be considered a
place of public accommodation under the ADA. "It would be irrational to
conclude that persons who enter an office to purchase services are protected
by the ADA, but persons who purchase the same services over the telephone or
by mail are not," wrote a three-judge panel in the case,
Carparts v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England. But two
other federal appeals courts have recently criticized the Carparts decision,
finding the provisions of the ADA to be limited to actual physical
structures.
[SOURCE: CyberTimes, AUTHOR: Carl Kaplan]
(http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/cyber/cyberlaw/12law.html)
See Also:
U.S. LAW AIMS AT HELPING DISABLED
[SOURCE: CyberTimes, AUTHOR: Pamela Mendels]
(http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/cyber/articles/12access.html)
IN E-POLITICS, CLINTON'S EX-ADVISER STILL PLAYS BY HIS RULES
Issue: Political Discourse
A new political Web site (Vote.com) is drawing criticism from many advocates
of online democracy. Dick Morris, a former advisor of President Clinton ,
has launched a site that asks visitors to vote yes or no on featured issues
and then converts the thousands of votes into e-mail messages that are sent
to elected officials. "From the perspective of the Internet, this just adds
to e-mail gridlock," said Joe Rodota, the founder of election-oriented Web
site FAQvoter.com. Morris said that his method of directing individuals'
votes to elected officials provides "a megaphone that gives an opportunity
for anyone who wants to be heard." Critics also complain that Morris is
selecting the issues and not the site's visitors. "He is destroying the
medium for people who want to have serious discourse," said Ken Deutsch,
vice president for Internet strategy at Issue Dynamics, a public affairs
concern in Washington.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Rebecca Fairley Raney]
(http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/biztech/articles/12vote.html)
ELECTION PANEL CLEARS A USE OF WEB SITES BY CAMPAIGNS
Issue: Political Discourse
The Federal Election Commission has decided that Web sites independently
created by campaign supporters will be considered a form of volunteering
and not a campaign contribution. The opinion came in response to an inquiry
from Gov. Gorge W. Bush's campaign that asked if Web sites created by
supporters qualified as contributions. "It will let political participation
on the Internet gain strength," said Benjamin L. Ginsberg, lawyer for the
Bush campaign, of the opinion.
[SOURCE: New York Times (A23), AUTHOR: New York Times Staff]
(http://www.nytimes.com)
TWO START-UPS PLAN TO MARKET UNSOLD RADIO TIME ON THE WEB
Issue: Broadcasting/Advertising
Some Web companies are hoping that the Internet will do the same for radio
stations with leftover ad spots, as it has done for airlines with left over
seats. Starting in early 2000, Broadcastspots.com and Adauction.com plan to
sell radio spots on their Web sites. The idea is to conduct the current
process of selling unsold air time in cyberspace. At present, station
representatives make rounds of calls to offer last-minute discounts. If the
time remains unsold, it is filled with music or public service
announcements. The Web sites will allow stations to showcase spots to
hundreds of media buyers at once and to sell spots almost instantly. That
will save time and effort. "For radio stations, this will be a brand-new
revenue stream," says Jeffrey
Trumper, a former radio industry executive who founded Broadcastspots.com
three months ago. Trumper expects his site to make money by collecting a 25%
commission on each spot sold. The Web businesses still have to convince
radio executives that the $16 billion radio industry needs their services.
Radio executives are also concerned that establishing a formal practice of
deep discounting might encourage some advertisers to delay buying -- but
media buyers say it's unlikely that will happen as the biggest advertisers
would not want to miss out on prime spots. Paula Hambrick of Hambrick &
Associates, near Chicago, says clients sometimes call on Thursdays looking
to go on the air as soon as Monday. Regular business hours give her little
time to construct a deal. "It would certainly help me buy more quickly and
effectively," she says. Both sites will post radio audience demographics and
ratings information for each available spot, and both plan to eventually
sell television spots too.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, (B8), AUTHOR: Calmetta Y. Coleman]
(http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB942364823455657163.htm)
SMALL FIRM OFFERS TO PROCESS TAX RETURNS FREE ON INTERNET
Issue: Ecommerce
H. D. Vest of Dallas, Texas, a small money management company, says it will
let anyone prepare and file an income tax return free next year on its Web
site, no matter how much the filer makes or how complicated the tax return.
"Bill Gates can do his return for free at our site," said Herb Vest, founder
and chief executive of H. D. Vest. H.& R. Block and Intuit, offer free tax
preparation at their Web sites but only for people with modest incomes or
simple tax returns. This move illustrates how the tax preparation and
investment advice businesses are merging and how technology is driving down
the cost of income tax preparation. From Vest's perspective, offering free
tax return preparation at its Web site (www.hdvest.com) is a low-cost
strategy to expand its base of 1.7 million clients. Each tax return
represents a chance to solicit a new investment client at a cost of less
than $1 each to process the return, Vest said.
[SOURCE: New York Times (C2), AUTHOR: David Cay Johnston]
(http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/biztech/articles/12tax.html)
REGULATION
SPEECH: BLAZING A TRAIL: A VISION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY
Issue: Regulation
Chairman Kennard's remarks to the National Association of Regulatory Utility
Commissioners focus on the reorganization of the FCC and three goals for the
agency for the next century: competition in the communications industry,
consumer protection and universal service. Concerning universal service he
said: "And as we refocus our energies towards promoting competition and
innovation and towards consumer protection, we must always remember that
competition does not come to all people and all parts of America at the same
time. We must remember that competition is not the only ingredient to a
healthy marketplace. Communities without access to advanced technologies
will be placed at substantial risk in the next century, and we must ensure
that all Americans, no matter where they live, reap the benefits of the
Information Age. We are moving full speed ahead to meet this challenge.
Soon, we will be working together through the Joint Conference to speed the
deployment of advanced telecommunications services to all Americans. The
Joint Conference will serve as a clearinghouse for information and ideas
about broadband. I'm confident it will speed ubiquitous access to every
person. I'm looking forward to serving on it and I applaud Bob Rowe and
NARUC for spearheading the resolution last July that helped make the Joint
Conference a reality."
[SOURCE: FCC]
(http://www.fcc.gov/Speeches/Kennard/spwek939.doc)
ANTITRUST
NEW LEGAL GUNS TRAIN ON MICROSOFT
Issue: Antitrust
The lawyers who sued Philip Morris are looking at a new object of
interest: Microsoft. Veterans from the cigarette wars are plotting to sue
Microsoft in a wave of private litigation in courts across the
country. "Millions of people bought Windows, and if the company overcharged
consumers, it should be held responsible," Stanley Chesley, a prominent
class-action tobacco lawyer said. Judge Jackson paved the way for the
litigation when he issued findings of fact that concluded Microsoft
ruthlessly exploited its market power to strong-arm corporate customers and
competitors, and that a range of Microsoft tactics stifled innovation,
reduced consumer choice and led to higher prices. Antitrust law grants
triple damages to plaintiffs who prevail, so if consumers overpaid for
copies of Windows by just $10 apiece, verdicts could easily wind up in the
billions of dollars, say specialists. Microsoft officials say such suits
are without grounds and ironic since the judge found that Microsoft charges
less than its rivals in the operating system market. Some lawyers don't
plan to wait until Judge Jackson issues his conclusions before filing suit
against the software maker. Some contend that the findings of fact alone
could be used in private litigation. The threat of an outpouring of
lawsuits could lead Microsoft to try to settle the case in the coming
months, experts say. However, Microsoft won't be an easy target. One lawyer
estimated that a national class action would cost at least $3 million, a
price that might daunt all but the deepest pocketed firms. Antitrust law
generally blocks actions by indirect purchasers of products, meaning those
whose version of Windows came pre-loaded into their computers would likely
be precluded from suing the software company. Those who purchased the
Windows 98 upgrade in retail stores would likely be able to sue.
[SOURCE: Washington Post (E1), AUTHOR: David Segal]
(http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/feed/a55763-1999nov12.htm)
See Also:
LEGAL EXPERTS ASSESS MICROSOFT'S OPTIONS FOR APPEAL
[SOURCE: New York Times (A1), AUTHOR: Steve Lohr]
(http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/biztech/articles/12soft.html)
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we're outta here. Have a great weekend; see you Monday.