Originally published: July 11, 2011
Last updated: July 11, 2011 - 3:07pm
[Commentary] There’s the usual cacophony of subsidy junkies clamoring that we should go build a huge system of fast broadband that will reach every hovel in the land, no matter how rural. The questions is, as with the building of any other form of infrastructure, is cabling the nation actually worth it? Remember the important point here: infrastructure does not make us rich. People using infrastructure to do new things, or to do old things better or more cheaply might, but the cables, roads, railways and bridges of infrastructure do not, in and of themselves, impart wealth. Of course they don't, for they are a cost. We do have to pay to build them after all. There’s no benefit to be had from it so why bother and why tax everyone to provide something that doesn't improve matters?
- Does High Speed Broadband Increase Economic Growth?
- Cyberwar, out of the shadows
- FCC Chairman Sees Rural Realities in Southwest Alaska
- Why Should I Care About CES?
- Broadband Deployment's "Best-in-Breed"
- A Faster Internet in 2015?
- The double standard in regulation for managed services and OTT
- AT&T Starts Telling Washington Why Its DirecTV Deal Should Pass
- We Can't Afford To Miss This Opportunity To Wire Rural America
- Maybe you don’t need a gig. Wireless might bridge the broadband gap
- Breaking News Takes a New Approach to the Personalized News Feed — A News Feed That’s Only Partly Personalized
- The Big Phone News from the FCC
- DISH's mysterious national wireless network plans
- Broadband: 21st-Century Infrastructure
- The New York Times Entirely Misunderstands The FCC Spectrum Auction