Debate: Governments Should Neither Subsidize Nor Operate Broadband Networks to Compete with Commercial Ones

Follow up on this event's outcomes through the related Headlines linked below to or skip to the event data.

Event Details

This event has passed.

Date: Jun 1 2011 - 9:00am - 11:00am
Location:
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), 1101 K Street, NW, Suite 610A, Washington, DC, 20005, United States

Debate: Governments Should Neither Subsidize Nor Operate Broadband Networks to Compete with Commercial Ones

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
9:00 - 11:00 AM

NCTA, the industry association of America's cable companies, claims that the Rural Utility Service mistakenly funded projects under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in areas that were already served by one or more broadband providers. RUS maintains the grants are defensible because existing broadband services in the areas were inadequate to support rural economic development. Meanwhile, the state of North Carolina is considering a bill that would restrict the ability of municipalities to use public funding to build broadband networks in markets that are already served by commercial providers; supporters of municipal networks maintain that existing broadband services are often inadequate in rural areas. Join ITIF for an Oxford-style debate on these controversies and, of course, elucidation on terms such as "served" and "unserved."

Participants:
Robert D. Atkinson
President and Founder, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

James Baller
President, Baller Herbst Law Group

Jeff Eisenach
Managing Director and Principal, Navigant Economics

Harold Feld
Legal Director, Public Knowledge

Browse

« March »
WeekSMTWTFS
92627281234
10567891011
1112131415161718
1219202122232425
132627282930311

Table view