Last updated: July 16, 2010 - 8:36am
[Commentary] The federal appeals court decision against the Federal Communications Commission regulations of "fleeting expletives" needs a hearing in the Supreme Court.
The court's legal reasoning must be updated in the face of rapid changes in media, the increasing assault of vulgarity on children, and the demand of parents for government help. This recent court decision on "fleeting expletives" was legally grounded in two centuries of assaults on free speech. But courts also need to recognize the real-world evidence of the harm done to vulnerable children by media creators who constantly push the boundaries of social acceptance.
- FCC Defends "Fleeting Expletives" Fox Ruling
- Network TV embraces the B-word
- Supreme Court defers action on TV 'expletives' case
- Stay "Fleeting Expletives" Enforcement, Says Media Institute
- Supreme Court Upholds 'Fleeting Expletive' Rule for Now
- Top Court weighs broadcast indecency
- Is FCC 'running wild' with its big fines for 'fleeting expletives'?
- Senate Commerce Passes Indecency Bill
- Court term to hear tobacco, TV dirty words cases
- Second Circuit Schedules Oral Arguments In Fox Vs. FCC for Jan 13
- Unfair and Indecent? Broadcast Regulation in the Courts and Congress at the Start of the Obama Administration
- Keaton slips, FCC stammers
- Networks Prepare To Challenge Remand
- The creeping of TV bleeping
- Media, officials dance around governor's colorful language