Last updated: March 7, 2013 - 8:43am
Massachusetts lawmakers could soon consider a bill that would restrict the commercial use of data gathered while children use computers at public schools. Its stated purpose is protecting privacy. An unnamed focus of the bill—backed by Microsoft -- is Google.
The bill, introduced in January, appears to take aim at Google's growing business of providing basic software like email and word processing over the Internet, which, in turn, is a growing threat to Microsoft's cash-cow suite of Office tools. The proposed legislation would prohibit companies that provide schools with "a cloud-computing" service—a digital service accessed via the Web—from using the information gleaned from schoolchildren for advertising or other commercial purposes. Microsoft acknowledges it is behind the Massachusetts legislation and that the bill is aimed at business practices employed by Google. The move opens a new front in a long-running battle between the software rivals in which Microsoft has run advertisements questioning Google's privacy practices and pressed regulators to more closely police Google's activities.
- Cable TV, Advertisers Join In Fight to Preserve Power
- More than 70 companies just signed a pledge to protect student data privacy -- with some notable exceptions
- Which Students Get to Have Privacy?
- Google Under Fire for Data-Mining Student E-mail Messages
- Deal Is Easy Part for Microsoft and Nokia
- What Do the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights and Net Neutrality Have in Common?
- Microsoft, others complain to EU about Google+, report says
- Group Presses for Safeguards on the Personal Data of Schoolchildren
- Ban on Cellphones in New York City Schools to Be Lifted
- Tech Companies Help Make NSA Surveillance Possible -- and They Can Help Stop It, Too
- What a Difference a Week Makes: A New Framework for Protecting Privacy
- Tech Firms Disclose Certain Data
- The Holes in Microsoft’s Data Protection Pledge
- A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the State of the Union
- Big Tech vs. NSA: Pot calling the kettle black?