Originally published: December 21, 2011
Last updated: December 23, 2011 - 1:13am
Social media sites like Facebook have long been criticized as catering to users’ own deluded senses of self-importance, but a current lawsuit against Facebook might prove that social media users really are that important.
Within their circles of friends, in fact, users might well be considered celebrities–and that could have big legal implications. When a federal judge last week denied Facebook’s motion to dismiss the case early on, she opened the door for meaningful legal discussion as to how far websites’ privacy policies actually reach and, perhaps, whether social networking makes users not just self-important, but actually important. As the Judge Lucy Koh noted in her order, this case, which stems from Facebook’s Sponsored Stories feature, involves multiples issues of first impression under California law. If the case doesn’t settle, but actually is resolved and likely appealed, it could provide valuable guidance for how future courts will decide issues regarding the relationship between social media sites and their users, and between users themselves. Are we all public figures on Facebook? If so, what does that mean?
- Facebook to pay 614,000 users $15 each over privacy concerns
- Facebook will have to face lawsuit over scanning of users' messages
- Facebook needs to open service to kids under 13
- Court tosses privacy suit aimed at Hulu
- OK, now I’m convinced Facebook is trying to be creepy
- FTC official: Sharing on social sites ‘can’t be forced’
- Facebook Faces Privacy Lawsuit
- Privacy Implications of Social Media Manipulation
- Consumers and Broadband
- Facebook Hit With More Privacy Lawsuits In The Wake Of Changing Users' Settings
- They can’t all be SOPA: Are webizens ready to fight with nuance?
- Security firm calls on Facebook to step up its game
- Why Americans use social media
- Facebook makes changes to its data use policies
- Facebook, If You're Serious About Privacy Controls, Let Me Control Them