Originally published: November 6, 2011
Last updated: December 20, 2011 - 8:43pm
The White House took umbrage with comments and blog posts claiming it hasn't taken its responses to petitions posted on its new We the People website seriously.
"Every petition that reaches the threshold is put through a review process that begins with the policy experts who deal in the appropriate area," White House Digital Strategy Director Macon Phillips wrote in a blog post. "There has been some frustration with the answers from those who disagree with Administration policy, and that's fair," Phillips wrote. But "while people may not agree with a position, it's crucial to understand its rationale . . . If these petitions are fostering a debate that might not otherwise take place about the issues Americans care about, that's a positive thing." We the People is averaging about 20,000 new users and 31,000 new signatures each day, Phillips said.
- White House to petitioners: We ARE listening
- White House grapples with a flood of online petitions
- White House 'We the People' Site, Explained
- White House issues first online petition response
- The New We the People Write API, and What It Means for You
- Fewer online petitions posted to We the People website
- We the Coders: Open-Sourcing We the People, the White House's Online Petitions System
- White House Ramps Up E-Petition Responses
- Petition to unlock cellphones passes mark for White House response
- We The People Petitioners Typically Wait Three Months for a Reply
- White House to respond to petition urging veto of online piracy bill
- How We’re Changing the Way We Respond to Petitions
- The White House's We The People Petition Website: First Year Report Card
- When The People Speak Is Anyone Listening?
- The White House's New We the People Petition Website