Tuesday, March 14, 2023
Headlines Daily Digest
ICYMI: 50 Ways the American Rescue Plan Act is Improving Internet Connectivity
Don't Miss:
Broadband Affordability Program in Jeopardy But Has Overwhelming Bipartisan Support
How Not To Help Close the Digital Divide
Washington may be about to take a giant step backward in closing the digital divide
Digital Equity




Community Anchor Institutions

State/Local Initiatives


Data & Mapping

Platforms/Social Media

The rise of the platform economy | Financial Times




Devices

Budget

Company News


War & Communications

Policymakers

Stories From Abroad

Digital Equity

New polling shows that the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) is overwhelmingly popular among Republican, Democratic, and Independent voters alike. A strong, bipartisan majority of voters (78 percent) support continuing the ACP, including 64 percent of Republicans, 70 percent of Independents, and 95 percent of Democrats, according to a national survey of 1,000 registered voters conducted by Public Opinion Strategies and RG Strategies in January 2023. Similar majorities also hold for urban, suburban, and rural households, who all support ACP by 68 percent or more.
New Interactive Map Shows Estimated Enrollment by Congressional District in At-Risk Broadband Affordability Program

The Affordable Connectivity Congressional Map illustrates estimated enrollment in the Affordability Connectivity Program (ACP) by congressional district and state. The following states rank highest for ACP enrollment: Louisiana (21%), Kentucky (18%), New Mexico (18%), North Carolina (17%), Ohio (17%), South Carolina (16%), Alabama (16%), Mississippi (15%), New York (15%), and Oklahoma (15%). Enrollment is high in both rural and urban areas. For example, 29% of Kentuckians in the heart of Appalachia (KY-05) are enrolled as are 25% of Louisianans in rural parishes (LA-05). Congressional districts in urban areas, such as in Los Angeles (CA-22) and in and around Jacksonville (FL-04), are similarly high with enrollment rates of 31% and 17%, respectively. A popular broadband affordability program with overwhelming bipartisan support, the ACP is now at risk of running out of funding next year if Congress fails to act. Since its inception, over 16 million people have enrolled in the program nationwide.

If you’re a person living in the United States without quality broadband, you should be very disappointed in the way your elected officials have failed to meet the following challenge of closing the digital divide recently:
- Strike One (March 7): The 15-month failure to seat a full 5-member Federal Communications Commission. After three hearings and registering the support of 400 organizations across the political spectrum and 400,000 citizens, the Biden administration and US Senate gave the broadband industry exactly what it wanted – two years (or more) of a deadlocked FCC. This nomination process was a shameful display of the power of misinformation and homophobia at work in the nation.
- Strike Two (March 8): The failure to renew the FCC’s authority to auction spectrum. For the past 30 years, the US has renewed the FCC’s authority to auction spectrum without fail – until now. Congress just allowed this authority to expire. Fortunately, there are no auctions underway and none on the immediate horizon, so this lapse will not cause permanent damage to the FCC’s ability to conduct auctions so long as it is short-lived.
- Strike Three (March 9): The failure to provide additional funds to the Affordable Connectivity Fund (ACP). Despite lavishing praise on the ACP as a critical initiative to make broadband affordable for low-income families, the Biden administration’s budget proposal makes no request for additional funding. Instead, the budget relies on an optimistic timeline for existing funding to last. While estimates suggest that the program could run out of funds next year, the White House seems comfortable banking on smaller demand on these funds, leaving out the estimated 24 million eligible American households who have not yet signed up.
To finish the baseball analogy, the US struck out, but the game isn’t over. The public will be watching to see if the Administration takes steps to achieve the broadband agenda it has touted. This starts with getting a well-qualified fifth commissioner confirmed to the FCC immediately, but also includes strong anti-discrimination rules called for by law and restoring the FCC’s Title II authority over broadband so the agency can protect more consumers over this essential network.
[Chris Lewis is the President and CEO of Public Knowledge]

The North Star of communications policy should be to make services faster, better, and cheaper for all. Yet, next year, about 50 million Americans could find that their access to the core communications service of our time—broadband—has become slower, worse, and more expensive, with many even likely to be disconnected. That shift would constitute the biggest step any country has ever taken to widen, rather than close, its digital divide. The reason for the potential debacle? The Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), which provides a $30 per month subsidy for broadband to over 16 million households (with the number continuing to grow), will run out of funds. The program is projected to exhaust all its funds sometime in the first half of 2024. The end of the program would be a disaster for families who generally have little savings or discretionary income and will suddenly face monthly broadband charges of $30 or more. It would also rob the broader economy of an opportunity to grow faster due to universal connectivity. Ending the program would also limit the enormous potential for savings in critical services that broadband can deliver. The obvious solution is for Congress to continue funding the program. That is possible, as it enjoys bipartisan support.
Community Anchors
IMLS Awards $180 Million to Support Communities Through Library Services in All U.S. States and Territories

In support of the intrinsic role that libraries play in promoting informed, healthy, vibrant communities, the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) has awarded $180 million in annual grants to each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the US Territories and Freely Associated States. These grants represent the largest source of federal funding support for library services. With this investment, the agency’s Grants to States program leverages state and local funding to support impactful library services across the nation. The IMLS Fiscal Year 2023 allotment table for 59 State Library Administrative Agencies (SLAAs) includes a base amount to each of the SLAAs plus a supplemental amount based on population. This year’s base amount rose to $1 million for states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and to $100,000 for other Territories and Freely Associated States, an increase that delivers on the statutory language of the agency’s 2018 reauthorization. Based on IMLS analysis of states’ newly submitted five-year plans, the agency anticipates significant investments in training for the library workforce (95% of states), reading (88% of states), library services for the blind and print disabled (73% of states), and broadband (71% of states) among other areas.

Kentucky, which only established its broadband office in 2022, is putting in some hard, and in some cases unique, work to enhance internet access and prepare for the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program. Meghan Sandfoss, executive director for Kentucky’s Office of Broadband Development, delved into some of the challenges the state has encountered. Naturally, rural deployment is at the forefront. The eastern part of Kentucky, which is comprised of 54 counties that are part of the Appalachian Regional Commission, has the “largest challenges in terms of developing infrastructure because of the terrain,” Sandfoss said. With regard to terrain, some providers have to get creative to deliver broadband to hard-to-reach locations across mountains and hills. In addition to prioritizing unserved areas—with speeds less than 25/3 Mbps—Sandfoss said the state is trying to identify “no service” locations—those with speeds below 10/1 Mbps. Because Kentucky’s broadband office is still relatively new, there’s no statewide broadband map currently available. But that will change soon, as Sandfoss said data collection for mapping will be done in May 2023. Thus far, Kentucky has submitted over 15,000 fixed availability challenges to the Federal Communications Commission's National Broadband Map. Some of those challenges have already been won, Sandfoss added. Kentucky has about $320 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds allocated for broadband deployment. From that amount, $117.2 million comes from the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program.

Consolidated Communications now offers 2 Gbps symmetrical service to more than 3,000 homes and small businesses in parts of rural Maine. The deployment was funded, in part, through money awarded to the company and to the Maine Connectivity Authority. The funding came through the Broadband Infrastructure Program administered by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). That program targeted public/private partnerships such as the one between Maine Connectivity Authority and Consolidated. Consolidated and Maine Connectivity won a $18.3 million grant in the program, which targeted unserved rural areas. The areas where Consolidated announced service include Rangeley, Dallas Plantation, Rangeley Plantation, and Sandy River Plantation. Other areas where the partners won funding include Blue Hill Peninsula and the town of Farmington. The funding came through the Maine Connectivity Authority’s Connect the Ready program.
Data & Mapping
Maryland Congressional Delegation Members Push FCC for Improved Broadband Mapping to Ensure Internet Access for Marylanders

The Maryland Congressional Delegation sent a letter urging the Federal Communications Commission to update and improve Maryland’s broadband mapping data based on the state's Office of Statewide Broadband’s comments on the National Broadband Map. The Office of Statewide Broadband (OSB) found approximately 3,800 addresses incorrectly identified as serviceable by internet service providers (ISPs) compared to the state’s information on unserved locations. The OSB submitted feedback as part of the challenge process to improve the accuracy of the FCC’s service availability data. This challenge process is a key component in creating a reliable dataset to determine the allocation of billions of dollars in broadband funding from the historic Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). The OSB and other state broadband agencies report that extended challenge time would allow for a more thorough analysis and identification of additional unserved households. The stakes are high: Inaccurate data will result in unfair funding allocations. As such, we ask the FCC to consider reviewing additional data from states through the end of March.

Technological innovation often leads to organizational innovation, and organizational innovation often leads to organizational opposition. As new forms of business organizations emerge and become dominant, interest groups and others often resist the change, decrying the new models as fundamentally negative. The reality of economic history is these new business models have been enormously positive. The world would be a vastly poorer place without the rise of the industrial organization, then the multidivisional corporation and now the Internet-based platform. As such, policymakers should be extremely cautious in their efforts to limit this next potential transition. Just as there was opposition to the corporate economy in the early 1900s, there is opposition to the platform economy today. But limiting “platformization” would have considerable long-lasting economic costs for the nation and consumers.

Cal.net, a service provider focused on offering fixed wireless access (FWA) and fiber broadband to California’s Central Valley and rural northern California, has a new CEO and new funding. And as the new CEO, Jack Barker explained, the company is gearing up for deployments again, despite being rejected for funding it tentatively won in the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) program. The RDOF program was designed to cover some of the costs of making broadband available to unserved and underserved rural areas. Cal.net was one of several companies that won RDOF funding for California but were rejected because the state did not grant them eligible telecommunications carrier (ETC) status, a requirement for the program. Barker has secured private equity funding through Littlebanc that is expected to fuel the company’s future expansion plans. As Baker explained those plans, “We build as many fiber points of presence as possible and serve the last mile with whatever [technology] makes sense.”
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and David L. Clay II (dclay AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2022. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org

Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2022