Friday, November 8, 2019
Headlines Daily Digest
Sen Kyrsten Sinema Linked to Super PAC Run by a Comcast Lobbyist
Don't Miss:
FCC Issues Advisory Committee Public Safety and Telehealth Reports
Public Safety/Health
Broadband
Wireless
- T-Mobile’s latest merger gambit isn’t subtle | Vox
Ownership
- NAB Joins FCC in Challenging Third Circuit | Broadcasting&Cable
- Free Press Slams FCC Attempt to Undermine Court Victory Restoring Media-Ownership Limits | Free Press
Communications and Democracy
Platforms
Security
Privacy
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Public Safety and Health
The Federal Communications Commission released four reports from its Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC). The reports aim to assist state, local, Tribal, and territorial officials and other stakeholders by offering recommendations and best practices to improve emergency alerting, bolster communications reliability during disasters, and promote the use of telemedicine:
- Multilingual Alerts – The IAC issued a report on the delivery of multilingual emergency alerts to people who communicate in a language other than English or who have a limited understanding of the English language. The report also makes recommendations regarding how alert initiators can deliver alerts to people with disabilities, which the IAC determined presented similar challenges to the delivery of alerts to non-English speakers.
- Plans for Alert Initiation – The IAC offered recommendations and best practices on improving communication between state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments and State Emergency Communication Committees to ensure that Emergency Alerting System procedures, including those for initiation and cancellation of actual alerts and tests, are mutually understood, agreed upon, and documented in state plans.
- Disaster Resiliency – The IAC issued recommendations on fine-tuning state, local, Tribal, and territorial coordination for disaster preparation, response, and restoration efforts, including best practices to promote resilient communications during and after an incident to help ensure first responders and the public have access to reliable communications.
- Clearing the Way for Telemedicine – IAC members identified state, local, Tribal, and territorial regulatory barriers to the use of telemedicine, as well as incentives that promote the adoption of telemedicine. The report discusses key issues, including state and local licensing laws or regulations that prevent telehealth providers from treating patients across state lines, and intrastate restrictions that may inhibit the provision of telemedicine.
NH legislators in 2019 passed a law allowing municipalities to fund broadband networks through bond offerings – and that action already is spurring broadband deployment in sparsely populated areas of the state. One of the biggest beneficiaries of this is Consolidated Communications. Consolidated is already offering service on a new network in Chesterfield (NH) that was paid for, in part, by Consolidated and, in part, by the city. And as Consolidated Vice President of Consumer Products Rob Koester said, the company expects to build more broadband networks through public-private broadband partnerships in the state in 2020. Public-private broadband partnerships are “a very big deal” for Consolidated, Koester said .“We do rural broadband. That’s what we, in large part, do.” The NH law, which Koester calls “transformational,” requires networks funded through municipal bonds to support speeds of at least 25 Mbps downstream and 3 Mbps upstream – although the ones Consolidated is building will support higher-speed service. Another requirement: The network must serve an area where service at speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps was not already available.
“What we brought to the table was the end user infrastructure fee that will be applied to any fiber connection until the bond is paid off,” Koester explains. This approach enabled Chesterfield to issue the bonds without a tax increase and without using any money from the general fund. This approach also has virtually eliminated potential opposition from residents who might not be interested in broadband and therefore wouldn’t want to help pay for the deployment. The city will own the network until the bond is paid off, at which point ownership will transfer to Consolidated. Until then, “we have an IRU [indefeasible right of use] to operate [the network], just as we would any other network we constructed,” Koester explained. The bonds will cover most of the costs of the aggregation infrastructure and Consolidated is covering costs from the pole to the home, along with customer premises equipment and labor.
OneWeb is talking a big game in satellite-delivered internet access—almost the size of this planet, to be more precise. OneWeb plans to surpass existing satellite-broadband firms by flying below them and in vastly larger numbers. Instead of rocketing a few large satellites all the way to geostationary Earth orbit (GEO)—22,236 miles up, at which point the satellite’s orbital period keeps it locked above one point on the equator—the company will launch hundreds of satellites in much lower orbits. Placing that constellation, 650 satellites at first and eventually 1,980, only 745 miles up could solve two problems. One, their overlapping orbits allow for worldwide coverage, while geostationary satellites start to fall below the horizon at the most northern and southern latitudes. The second advantage of OneWeb’s approach is that its lower orbit zaps out most of the painful latency inflicted by the 44,000 miles and change that data must take going to and from a geostationary satellite. In a July test, OneWeb reported download speeds of 400-Mbps to a Seoul location as it automatically switched from satellite to satellite—with latency under 40 milliseconds, versus 600 milliseconds and up for GEO satellite. OneWeb is pitching its constellation-to-be as a worldwide solution for 5G backhaul, connecting 5G networks in less-dense markets with those elsewhere.
Access to reliable, affordable broadband is critical in today’s economy, however, hundreds of Idaho communities have been left behind. Our state ranks 43rd for connectivity and 46th for speed. Too many Idahoans lack high-speed Internet service and those that have it pay too much because of weak competition. In May, Governor Little took an important first step, convening a Task Force to study how we improve Idaho’s broadband infrastructure. The Task Force determined that rural Idahoans should be given priority. Folks in communities like Orofino, Grangeville, McCall, Weiser, Challis, Rupert or Malad City have few options. But these communities are precisely the ones that benefit the most from high-quality broadband. The reality is that building broadband infrastructure in low-density areas is expensive. There is no getting around the physics. I would argue that this is not a technology issue but a business and regulatory one. Fortunately, we have the two models that will give us the upper hand: our irrigation infrastructure and our cousins in North Dakota.
Title 43 of the Idaho Code governs the creation and management of non-profit irrigation districts. We have had 100 years to fine-tune this model and it works. The task ahead of us is to update existing regulations for Internet Protocol packets instead of gallons of water. In North dakota, when CenturyLink began selling off unprofitable rural telephone lines, local independent and cooperative phone companies purchased these exchanges.
There is bipartisan agreement that the broadband status quo is failing Idahoans. As we see in the city of Ammon’s hugely successful fiber broadband system, communities thrive when citizens take charge of essential broadband infrastructure. Let us work together and put the same focus into our broadband infrastructure that we put into our irrigation infrastructure and create the foundation for a $12 billion digital economy that provides opportunity for urban and rural Idahoans alike.
[Todd Achilles is the CEO of Edge Networks.He serves on the advisory board of the Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy, and lectures in public policy with a focus on competition and technology.]
Wireless
5G wireless is coming -- and the battle has already begun over where to allow the antennas in Maryland
Baltimore’s (MD) streets are dotted with more than 600 “small cell wireless facilities” on streetlights and utility poles, making the city one of the first areas in MD to welcome the new technology. The sometimes box-like equipment delivers cellular signals faster than traditional cell phone towers, paving the way for 5G service. The wireless industry and local governments have faced off on the issue in the General Assembly, and could again in 2020. The industry wants a clear path to install the equipment and would like to see statewide legislation, while local governments want to control where the facilities go and what they look like. The Federal Communications Commission ordered local governments to set up permitting programs and allow the small cell facilities. The order, which went into effect in Jan, requires local governments to turn around approvals within 60 to 90 days and limits permit fees to a range of $100 to $500. Dozens of city and county governments across the country have challenged the FCC order in court, but it remains in effect while the litigation plays out.
T-Mobile plans to light up its nationwide 5G on Dec 6, laying a foundation for the New T-Mobile’s massive network that will have the capacity to deliver breakthrough connectivity initiatives to millions if the T-Mobile/Sprint merger closes in 2020.
- Introduces Connecting Heroes Initiative, a 10-year commitment for free 5G access to every first responder at every public and non-profit state and local police, fire and EMS agency across the entire country
- Unveils Project 10Million, a $10 billion commitment built to eradicate the homework gap for millions of children, giving free service to 10 million households
- Announces T-Mobile Connect, a groundbreaking prepaid solution for everyone at half the price of the lowest offer today – for just $15 per month.
The T-Mobile/Sprint merger already has approval from the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice. The remaining hurdle is a lawsuit filed by attorneys general from multiple states, which is expected to come to trial in Dec.
The Federal Communications Commission is seeking full-court review of a three-judge panel decision vacating its broadcast media ownership deregulation decision. The FCC filed a petition for review, arguing that the three-judge panel decision imposed burdens beyond those allowed in the Administrative Procedure Act, second-guessed the FCC to the point that it undermined congressional intent, and breaks with higher-court and sister-court precedents. “Over the last 15 years," said a FCC spokesperson, "while the media marketplace has changed dramatically, the same Third Circuit panel has repeatedly prevented the FCC from modernizing its ownership rules, including the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rule that dates back to 1975. We hope that the full Third Circuit will agree to hear this case and finally allow the FCC to update these rules for the digital age.”
"It is extremely disappointing that the FCC would prefer to fight rather than do what would benefit everyone, which is to assess the impact of its actions on its goals of localism, diversity and competition," said Andrew Jay Schwartzman, senior counselor at the Benton Institute. "As a legal matter, this petition comes 15 years too late; the FCC's challenge is really to what the same judges found in 2004, and if it had problems with the initial holding, it would have had to make this appeal at that time."
We don’t need to rank in importance the issues of special interest money, ludicrous redistricting, and big media. They are each part of a linked democratic challenge. There can be no real democracy without curbing big money. There can be no real democracy without making Congressional districts representative of the areas they encompass. There can be no real democracy without an electorate informed by media that digs for the facts citizens need to help chart the future of our country. Bring these three abuses under control and democracy can flourish again. Only We the People can make it happen. It’s no spectator sport; it is a democratic imperative—for each and every one of us.
[Michael Copps served as a commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission from May 2001 to December 2011 and was the FCC's Acting Chairman from January to June 2009. In 2012, Copps joined Common Cause to lead its Media and Democracy Reform Initiative.]
Policymakers
Sen Kyrsten Sinema, the Only Anti-Net Neutrality Democrat, Linked to Super PAC Run by a Comcast Lobbyist
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) is the only Senate Democrat not co-sponsoring the Save the Internet Act, a bill to restore net neutrality rules that were enacted by the Federal Communications Commission during the Obama administration and reversed in 2017 by President Trump’s FCC Chair, former Verizon attorney Ajit Pai. Instead, Sen Sinema has formed a working group with Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), who blocked a vote on the Save the Internet Act in June, to craft a new bill on the issue. Sens Sinema and Wicker have both said they oppose the Obama-era rule that treats internet services as a common carrier, allowing the FCC to use broader regulatory authority granted to it under Title II of the Communications Act, and would prefer that it be regulated under Title I of that Act, which limits the FCC’s ability to enforce regulations. Internet service providers (ISPs) take the same position, arguing that Title II classification would lead to lower investment by the industry, something that did not occur while the rules were in effect.
So why has Sen Sinema bucked her party and taken a telecom industry-friendly position on net neutrality? One possible answer may be her relationship with a “dark money” nonprofit called Center Forward that receives substantial funding from cable and telecom industry trade groups and its affiliated super PAC, Center Forward Committee, which is run by a Comcast lobbyist. Sen Sinema directed a six-figure donation to Center Forward Committee through a centrist PAC that she used to chair just weeks before the group made big independent expenditures to support Sinema’s campaigns. Center Forward is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit with a board composed exclusively of corporate lobbyists that says it “works to end the culture of gridlock in Washington by bringing together moderate centrist allies to find bipartisan solutions.” Center Forward does not have to disclose its donors, but telecom industry groups that lobby against net neutrality have given it substantial and consistent donations.
The Federal Communications Commission announces the reauthorization of the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) and solicits nominations for membership on the IAC. The current term of the IAC expired on Sept 24, 2019. The term of operations for the reauthorized IAC will be limited to two years, with an option for reauthorization at the end of the two-year period and will commence with its first meeting. Nominations for membership are due by Dec 6, 2019.
During its two-year term, the IAC may be tasked by the Chairman to produce specific deliverables that will further the FCC’s mission and objectives, including, but not limited to, those related to the deployment and adoption of broadband services for Tribal and rural communities and other unserved or underserved areas, bridging the urban-rural digital divide, emergency preparedness and response, “Smart Cities” and infrastructure-related initiatives, and consumer complaints, processes and data. The duties of the Committee include providing guidance to the FCC, gathering data and information, and performing those analyses that are necessary to respond to the questions or matters before it.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Robbie McBeath (rmcbeath AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2019. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
727 Chicago Avenue
Evanston, IL 60202
847-328-3049
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2019