Daily Digest 10/15/2021 (We Must Close the Digital Divide)

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
Table of Contents

Digital Inclusion

Benton Foundation
The Digital Divide is Real—And It’s Sexist  |  Read below  |  Kevin Taglang  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
Hundreds of thousands of Coloradans qualify for a $50 broadband internet credit. So why aren’t they seizing it?  |  Read below  |  Tamara Chuang  |  Colorado Sun

Broadband Infrastructure

Digital divide fix at risk as $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill stalls  |  Read below  |  Marguerite Reardon  |  C|Net
We Must Close the Digital Divide  |  Read below  |  Charles Lewis  |  Op-Ed  |  Morning Consult
FCC Designates 5 Carriers as Eligible for Universal Service Support  |  Read below  |  Kris Anne Monteith  |  Public Notice  |  Federal Communications Commission
Maine Towns Team Up to Establish Municipal Broadband Utility  |  Read below  |  Abigail Curtis  |  Bangor Daily News

Local Initiatives

Opinion: Urge Knox County Commissioners to support the broadband change we need  |  Penobscot Bay Pilot

Wireless/Spectrum

5G Experience Report October 2021  |  Read below  |  Research  |  OpenSignal
Huawei makes a push for greener 5G networks  |  Fierce
Verizon marks 711 Mbps upload speed in mmWave trial with Samsung and Qualcomm  |  Fierce

Health

Congressman Pence Leads Bipartisan Legislation to Expand Rural Access to Telehealth  |  Read below  |  Rep Greg Pence (R-IN)  |  Press Release  |  House of Representatives

Platforms/Social Media

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Rein in Big Tech  |  Read below  |  Sen Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)  |  Press Release  |  US Senate
House Commerce Committee Democrats Announce Legislation to Reform Section 230  |  Read below  |  Rep Anna Eshoo (D-CA)  |  Press Release  |  House of Representatives
Facebook starts rolling out end-to-end encrypted backups to WhatsApp  |  Vox
Facebook whistleblower eyes state attorney generals, expanding regulatory threat beyond Washington  |  Washington Post
Podcast: Will the Facebook whistleblower’s testimony spur new US digital regulation?  |  Brookings
YouTube’s stronger election misinformation policies had a spillover effect on Twitter and Facebook, researchers say.  |  New York Times
How YouTube Copied Hollywood to Win Video Makers’ Loyalty  |  Wall Street Journal

Security

Biden administration holds meeting on ransomware threat with more than 30 nations and EU  |  Washington Post

Agenda

FTC Announces Agenda for October 21 Open Commission Meeting  |  Read below  |  Press Release  |  Federal Trade Commission

Industry/Company News

Is the Broadband Industry Heading Towards Mutually Assured Destruction?  |  Read below  |  Joan Engebretson  |  telecompetitor
Comcast claims first with end-to-end full duplex DOCSIS 4.0 link  |  Fierce
Investors are anxious after Charter’s wireless pricing changes  |  Fierce

Stories From Abroad

Microsoft will shut down LinkedIn service in China after facing criticism for censoring posts  |  Washington Post
Facebook whistleblower Sophie Zhang will testify about the company before British lawmakers  |  Washington Post
Canada’s Shaw reveals plan to fend off fiber competition  |  Fierce
US, European Nations Claim Progress on Path to Removing Digital Taxes  |  Wall Street Journal
Cybersecurity Experts Sound Alarm on Apple and EU Phone Scanning Plans  |  New York Times
David Ignatius: Of course Biden’s a globalist. He should start acting like one on technology.  |  Washington Post
Apple takes down Koran app in China  |  BBC
Today's Top Stories

Digital Inclusion

The Digital Divide is Real—And It’s Sexist

Kevin Taglang  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

For many, the digital divide is the gap between who has access to broadband infrastructure or who does not. But a truer definition is the gap between who's actually using our most powerful communications tools and who is not. Using this broader measure and examining use around the world, we see that women are being left offline. And this gender gap costs everyone. This week, the Alliance for Affordable Internet, a global coalition working to drive down the cost of internet access in low- and middle-income countries, released The Costs of Exclusion: Economic Consequences of the Digital Gender Gap. The findings are troubling, to say the least.

Hundreds of thousands of Coloradans qualify for a $50 broadband internet credit. So why aren’t they seizing it?

Tamara Chuang  |  Colorado Sun

A $50 credit on monthly internet service could mean the difference between having broadband and not having internet at all. But from the looks of federal data, there hasn’t been much interest in claiming the money made available by the Emergency Broadband Benefit (EBB) Program. The program launched in May 2021 and provides low-income consumers up to $50 off their monthly broadband bill (or $75 for those living on Tribal lands). But five months after it launched, EBB serves just over 63,000 households in Colorado, a fraction of those who qualify. Everyone on Medicaid is eligible and that’s 1.5 million people in Colorado. “The current number of EBB enrolled households is 63,019, which is 13.4 percent participation. Compared to other states, that percentage is in the lower middle range,” said state Chief Information Officer Tony Neal-Graves. “We are currently evaluating our outreach strategy.” The $3.2 billion national program, funded by a federal COVID relief package, has made changes to simplify the enrollment process for users and internet providers. But there’s been a minimal amount spent on marketing to get the word out. About 6 million US households had enrolled nationwide as of October 4. According to the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, that represents just 16 percent of the eligible US population, meaning $2.5 billion is still available.

Broadband Infrastructure

Digital divide fix at risk as $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill stalls

Marguerite Reardon  |  C|Net

As Democrats in Congress wrestle over President Joe Biden's multitrillion-dollar package targeting everything from roads to child care, hanging in the balance is a small but critical sliver of the infrastructure bill seen as a possible salve to our digital divide problem. This legislation provides long-overdue funding to upgrade traditional infrastructure, such as roads, bridges and electrical grids. But also included in the bill is a proposal for $65 billion in federal funding for broadband investment. President Biden, who sees both pieces of legislation as essential to his Build Back Better domestic agenda, says it will happen. But some fear that a stalemate that results in the House not voting on the bipartisan infrastructure bill will fritter away a once-in-a-generation opportunity to finally close the digital divide, an issue that has dogged policymakers for decades. Blair Levin, lead author of the 2010 National Broadband Plan under former President Obama, says that even if the broader infrastructure bill ends up without a House vote, efforts to solve the digital divide will not entirely die with it. He is hopeful that a separate bill could be carved out just to support broadband and closing the digital divide. "There is so much bipartisan consensus on the need for getting more people online," he said. "I think if a deal can't be struck, there will be pressure on Democrats to do something with the broadband portion of the infrastructure bill." He added that Republicans would likely support it. "This is one of the most popular provisions of the infrastructure bill. I haven't heard a single policy objection." But, he said, "It's not likely to happen quickly."

We Must Close the Digital Divide

Charles Lewis  |  Op-Ed  |  Morning Consult

During the summer of 2021, the Senate gave overwhelming approval to $65 billion for broadband access in the bipartisan infrastructure bill. The pandemic had clearly captured the attention of elected officials. The ultimate success of this initiative depends first on Congress’ final approval, then on the Federal Communications Commission and other government agencies being ready to move quickly in allocating funds. Jessica Rosenworcel is now serving as the FCC’s acting chairperson, and the commission’s five-member panel currently has one vacancy. President Joe Biden should formally nominate Rosenworcel to serve as chair and fill the other position without delay. The cost of postponing a formal nomination is too great. Rosenworcel understands the nature of the problem, has long worked to address it and knows how to get the job done. Once the FCC gets the resources Congress has appropriated, it needs to have skilled and experienced leaders who care about these issues and who can ensure that the funds are distributed equitably. It will be a lost opportunity of historic proportions if we fall short because the FCC lacks the right leader when Rosenworcel is ready, willing and able to lead this massive effort. It is past time for the president to designate her as the permanent FCC chair if his administration truly wants to close the digital divide once and for all.

[Dr. Charles E Lewis Jr. is head of the Congressional Research Institute for Social Work and Policy.]

FCC Designates 5 Carriers as Eligible for Universal Service Support

Kris Anne Monteith  |  Public Notice  |  Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission designated five carriers across six states as eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) in eligible high-cost areas within the specified states. Designation in these areas is conditioned upon, limited to, and effective upon petitioners’ authorization to receive support under the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) program. Any such ETC designation covering RDOF supported areas, however, should not be interpreted as an entitlement to support or an indication that the Bureau will ultimately authorize the petitioner for support. One additional petitioner, Carolina West Wireless, requested designation as an ETC in an area not eligible for RDOF funding authorization. For such area, the Bureau limits the ETC designation to eligibility for Lifeline support. In making these designations, the Bureau finds that each of these petitioners meets the eligibility requirements to receive universal service support. If the Bureau decides the petitioners should be authorized to receive support, it will release separate public notices announcing funding authorizations.

The five carriers are: 1) Bright House Networks Information Services (Alabama); Charter Fiberlink – Alabama; Time Warner Cable Information Services (Alabama); 2) Talkie Communications (Delaware); 3) Conexon Connect (Florida), 4) Conexon Connect (Tennessee), and 5) Charter Fiberlink – Tennessee, Time Warner Cable Information Services (Tennessee).

Maine Towns Team Up to Establish Municipal Broadband Utility

Abigail Curtis  |  Bangor Daily News

A group of Waldo County (ME) residents is working to create an affordable broadband utility that every resident in Searsmont and four other towns should be able to access. The task force has been collecting data from residents and mapping the community's level of current Internet service, which members believe is low. To address this problem, Searsmont and the neighboring communities of Liberty, Palermo, Montville and Freedom have formed the Southwest Waldo County Broadband Coalition, which has a long-term plan of creating a municipally-owned public broadband utility. The cost for this is likely to be between $7 and $10 million, and right now the hope is to pay for it through grant funding and, later, through revenue bonds. "The utility itself would be responsible for paying the bonds," said Searsmont board member Pete Milinazzo. "We want to emphasize the fact that we're not going to do it with taxpayer dollars." Another possible funding avenue, he said, is the federal stimulus money available through the American Rescue Plan Act. Waldo County has received the first half of the $7.7 million award, and county officials plan to invest roughly $3 million of that in upgrades to emergency services infrastructure.

Wireless

5G Experience Report October 2021

Research  |  OpenSignal

US carriers have further expanded their 5G coverage using their low band 5G networks. However, the largest and most notable improvement was driven by the expansion of mid-band 5G. AT&T and Verizon are about to receive the first tranche of C-band spectrum (3.7–3.98 GHz) — which will be released in December 2021, and have made plans already to deploy their own mid-band 5G and follow the path T-Mobile pioneered with the deployment of its 2.5 GHz spectrum. 

T-Mobile wins the 5G Download Speed award for the fourth time in a row, increasing once again its lead on Verizon and AT&T, with T-Mobile users’ average 5G download speeds breaking through the 100 Mbps mark. T-Mobile leds by an impressive 62.7 Mbps and with a 5G Download Speed that’s more than twice as fast as AT&T and Verizon’s scores. T-Mobile users saw average 5G download speeds of 118.7 Mbps, ahead of our users on Verizon and AT&T which scored 56 Mbps and 51.5 Mbps, respectively. T-Mobile users spent over one third of their time — 34.7% — with an active 5G connection compared with 16.4% for AT&T users and 9.7% on Verizon. T-Mobile wins the 5G Upload Speed award with a score of 16.1 Mbps, which shows a 0.9 Mbps improvement. Verizon places second at 14.4 Mbps. AT&T follows behind with 9.7 Mbps.

Health

Congressman Pence Leads Bipartisan Legislation to Expand Rural Access to Telehealth

Rep Greg Pence (R-IN)  |  Press Release  |  House of Representatives

Reps Greg Pence (R-IN) and Angie Craig (D-MN) introduced the Rural Telehealth Access Task Force Act (H.R.5506) to expand rural communities’ access to telehealth capabilities. The proposed legislation seeks to establish a Rural Telehealth Access Task Force between the Federal Communications Commission, United States Department of Agriculture, Department of Health and Human Service, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. If enacted by law, the task force would be commissioned with identifying barriers to the adoption of telehealth technologies in rural America, sharing information on the deployment of broadband funding through federal programs to expand access to broadband, and provide findings and recommendations to Congress.

Platforms/Social Media

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Rein in Big Tech

Sen Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)  |  Press Release  |  US Senate

Sens Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chairwoman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, and Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced that they will introduce bipartisan legislation to restore competition online by establishing commonsense rules of the road for dominant digital platforms to prevent them from abusing their market power to harm competition, online businesses, and consumers. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act will:

  1. Set clear, effective rules to protect competition and users doing business on dominant online platforms.
  2. Give antitrust enforcers strong, flexible tools to deter violations and hold dominant platforms accountable when they cross the line into illegal behavior, including significant civil penalties, authority to seek broad injunctions, emergency interim relief, and potential forfeiture of executive compensation.
  3. Prevent self-preferencing and discriminatory conduct by the most economically significant online platforms with large US user bases which function as “critical trading partners” for online businesses.

House Commerce Committee Democrats Announce Legislation to Reform Section 230

Rep Anna Eshoo (D-CA)  |  Press Release  |  House of Representatives

House Energy and Commerce Committee Representatives introduced new legislation to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields websites and online platforms from being held liable for third-party content. Senior Member Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Chairman Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Mike Doyle (D-PA), and Consumer Protection and Commerce Subcommittee Chair Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) announced the bill. The Justice Against Malicious Algorithms Act, would amend Section 230 to remove absolute immunity in certain instances. Specifically, the bill would lift the Section 230 liability shield when an online platform knowingly or recklessly uses an algorithm or other technology to recommend content that materially contributes to physical or severe emotional injury. The bill will be introduced in the House on October 15. While the bill targets malicious algorithms, it does not apply to search features or algorithms that do not rely on personalization. It would also not apply to internet infrastructure such as web hosting or data storage and transfer, or to small online platforms with fewer than five million unique monthly visitors or users.

Agenda

FTC Announces Agenda for October 21 Open Commission Meeting

Press Release  |  Federal Trade Commission

Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan announced that an open meeting of the FTC will be held virtually on Thursday, October 21, 2021. The open meeting will begin at 1 pm EST and will be followed by a time for members of the public to address the FTC. Staff will present some findings from evidence gathered pursuant to the 2019 6(b) orders issued to six Internet service providers and three of their advertising affiliates in regards to their privacy practices. The public release of the report is subject to commission vote.

Industry News

Is the Broadband Industry Heading Towards Mutually Assured Destruction?

Joan Engebretson  |  telecompetitor

According to advocates of the Convergence Apocalypse theory, telecommunications companies’ increasingly ambitious fiber deployments pose a big threat to major cable companies at the same time that cable companies’ increasing success in offering mobile service poses a big threat to the major telcos. Both threats are real, researchers argue, but they don’t see the threats as symmetrical. Instead, they see cable companies having the advantage. MoffettNathanson offers several data points to illustrate the threat that telco fiber deployments pose to cable companies. Collectively, the major telcos have targeted 5 million homes for fiber overbuilds 2021, or about 4 percent of the US. Next year the target is 7 million homes or an additional 5 percent. By the researchers’ estimate, that means that the cable plant overbuilt by fiber will rise from about 40 percent or so today to about 55 percent over the next decade or so. While researchers initially thought the cable wireless business had “passable” margins, that business is actually dramatically more profitable. And that means the cable companies are well-positioned to use wireless as a “flanker” offering to retain broadband customers that might be tempted to switch to telco broadband as the telcos build out their fiber networks. That strategy could have the added impact of starving the telcos of cash, and potentially driving them to scale back their fiber deployments, according to MoffettNathanson.

Submit a Story

Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.


© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org


Kevin Taglang

Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org

Share this edition:

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021