|
Putting the Remote Control Back Into the Hands of Parents Download this chapter (pdf) (Word); download entire document (pdf) (Word) Exposure to educational television has been shown to have positive effects on the social, intellectual, and educational development of children.1 Is it possible to find truly educational content on broadcast television? The State of Television Today Today, parents are struggling to ensure that their children have the education and skills they need to compete and win in the 21st century economy. But for many parents television is a cause for concern. • Children watch an average of 25 hours a week of
television.2 In order to give parents greater control over the television programs viewed by their children, Congress in 1996 created the V-chip system, which includes the design of a rating system in tandem with technology built into TV sets that would enable parents to screen out programs containing sexual, violent, or other indecent material.8 Today, to win expedited license renewal approval, a television licensee must provide a minimum of three hours per week of educational and informational programs that “further the positive development” of children 16 years of age and younger.9 The Transition to Digital • Ensuring Three Hours Per Week of Positive
Children’s • Giving Parents Better Tools to Make Choices
for Their Children • Continuing Protections for Children from
Aggressive Advertising For the FCC’s new rules to be meaningful, they have to be enforced — and parents play a key role in this enforcement. Commercial TV stations must make and retain Children’s Television Programming Reports identifying the educational and informational programming for children aired by the station. You can also view each station’s reports on the FCC’s web site at http://www.fcc.gov/mb/policy/kidstv.html. If parents do not agree that the programming offered by a station is educational or informational, they can file a complaint with the FCC by contacting its Enforcement Bureau.12 Media reform activists are stepping forward to challenge the licenses of broadcasters who fail to serve the educational needs of children. After reviewing the children’s television reports filed by Washington, DC, television stations with the assistance of children’s television expert Dr. Dale Kunkel, a Professor in the Department of Communication of the University of Arizona, the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ and the Center for Digital Democracy asked the FCC to deny the license renewal applications of two television broadcasters serving the area for failure to serve the educational needs of children.13 The groups faulted the stations’ programming for failing to meet four of the FCC’s six requirements for children’s educational programming: 1) the programs were not specifically designed for children, 2) they were not specifically designed to educate, 3) they were not regularly scheduled, and 4) they were not identified on air as educational programming. Some programming not only lacked any significant educational purposes, but contained an anti-social message. As Dr. Kunkel explains, “a program that includes one violent attack after another cannot seriously be said to teach children to ‘get along with others’ as WDCA claims.” One of the questions raised by the two groups: How is teaching children anti-social behavior in their best interest? Parents in viewing areas in other parts of the country may have similar questions — and the FCC expects you to take action to bring questionable programming to its attention. This section used as a primary resource the Children Now Spring 2004 newsletter “Digital Television: Sharpening the Focus on Children,” available online at www.childrennow.org and offering a more detailed analysis of the issue. Three Steps to Improve Children’s TV: Download this chapter (pdf) (Word); download entire document (pdf) (Word) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||