Create your Benton.org account today. Registration is quick and easy. Creating an account gives you access to special features, click to learn more.
Shot Fired Across Martin's Bow on FCC Cable Report
Last updated: February 21, 2008 - 9:43am
SHOT FIRED ACROSS MARTIN'S BOW ON FCC CABLE REPORT
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Ira Teinowitz]
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin’s push to define the cable market in ways that would let him regulate it more actively hit a stumbling block today when Commissioner Robert M. McDowell said he will not go along. Commissioner McDowell indicated he would refuse to approve any agency report that says cable reaches 70% of U.S. households, the threshold needed for Chairman Martin to exert more power over cable operators. McDowell said that the 70% limit may not have been reached, based on industry estimates that 2 million fewer customers are getting TV from cable, and that satellite TV has picked up 1.7 million viewers. Phone company video service is approaching 1 million.
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2007/11/shot_fired_across_martins_bow.php
(requires free registration)
* McDowell: FCC Chairman Martin On A 'Radical’ Cable Course
“[Martin] is asserting that the cable industry, and the cable industry alone, is facing less competition and should be subject to more regulation. This is a radical departure for the [FCC] a departure being made without sufficient chance for public comment,” Commissioner McDowell said.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6504192.html?rssid=196
* Republican FCC Chairman Martin Needs Help from Democrats
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6504156.html?rssid=193
* Jackson: Martin’s 70/70 Finding ‘Deeply Disturbing’
On Monday Rainbow/PUSH Coalition founder the Rev. Jesse Jackson said FCC Chairman Martin is trying to use an "antiquated legal rule to advance what is widely seen by civil-rights leaders as an anti-diversity agenda." He added, "There is virtually no political support from either progressives or conservatives for such pet policies as a la carte pricing, which would raise prices for consumers and hurt most programmers, or for the various ‘leased-access’ programs that will squeeze out channel space for minority-owned programmers. Rather than work through the democratic process in Congress, a bureaucratic agency should not be using a 20-year-old-legal clause to implement wholesale policy changes that hurt consumers and hurt minority television programmers."
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6504165.html?rssid=193

