S.2686 the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006

Summary

* September 5, 2006: A new summary of the bill is now available.

* On August 4, the bill as approved by the Senate Commerce Committee was released. (For those scoring at home, the bill now goes by HR5252 in both the House and the Senate.)

* On June 16, a third draft of the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act was released. See a quick summary of the new Network Neutrality provisions.

* On June 9, a new draft of the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act was released.

On Monday May 1, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) introduced S.2686, the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act of 2006. The legislation, which consists of 10 separate titles, aims to reform existing communications laws to promote competition, cost savings for consumers, and the speedy deployment of broadband services to all Americans. Co-Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) co-sponsored the bill. The Committee will take up the bill during a two-step process. First, the Committee will hold two public hearings to consider the bill. Following this period of review, the Committee will hold an Executive Session after the Memorial Day recess to markup the legislation. Hearing dates and the Committee markup of the bill are to be determined. The Senate Commerce Committee has provided a title-by-title summary. The 132-page bill is available online at http://www.benton.org/sites/benton.org/files/06telcom6.pdf

See a summary of the bill.

Updates

* On Sept 30, the Senate Commerce Committee released its report on the Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement Act of 2006.

* Senate Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) vowed to move his telecommunications bill during a post-election congressional session. While Sen Stevens acknowledged that his bill "obviously can't be done before we go into recess," he said he is hopeful the Senate will schedule lame-duck floor action before adjournment. See http://www.benton.org/node/3582

* On Sept 19, 2006 more than 100 companies from the networking and communications sector, including Cisco Systems, Nortel Networks and Qualcomm, signed their names to a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The one-page document encouraged them to schedule a vote "in the very near future," adding that it was "too soon to enact network neutrality legislation."

* At the Sept 12 renomination hearing of FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens said the issue of Net Neutrality may well kill his communications bill. See http://www.benton.org/node/3405

*Sept 7, 2006 Democratic senators are blocking Republicans from potentially using a pending "enhanced 911" bill as a vehicle for passing major telecommunications legislation, multiple Capitol Hill sources said. See http://www.benton.org/node/3352

* September 5, 2006: A new summary of the bill is now available.

* Sept 6, 2006 The National League of Cities released The Truth About Telecom Taxes and Reform: The Real Effect on Local Government. U.S. state and local governments could lose $8 billion a year in revenue if Congress further restricts their ability to tax telecommunications services, the report finds.

* Sept 1, 2006 Advocates of Net Neutrality laws took to knocking on office doors of U.S. senators in 25 cities across the nation. Small groups of citizens, small businesses, nonprofits and individuals allied with the "Save the Internet" coalition staged rallies on Wednesday and Thursday. Hoisting orange signs touting their cause, they presented senators' offices with petitions signed by thousands who support legislation mandating the divisive concept, defined as a broad prohibition against prioritizing Internet content and services. See http://www.benton.org/node/3289

* Sen John Ensign (R-NV) said that the video franchise reform bill probably won't be able to pass unless expansion of the universal service fund (USF) remains in the bill. Its passage in any form is increasingly problematic, but he is still hopeful that constituents will contact their senators and push for the bill. See http://www.benton.org/node/3166

* On August 4, the bill as approved by the Senate Commerce Committee was released. A summary will follow soon. (For those scoring at home, the bill now goes by HR5252 in both the House and the Senate.)

* On August 1, Broadcasting&Cable reported that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) has not scheduled a floor vote this week for the video franchise bill, and is "highly unlikely to" given the already crowded schedule. See http://www.benton.org/ode/3124

* On July 27, Senate Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) expressed confidence that he would reach the 60-vote threshold of support necessary to stave off delaying tactics and move his sweeping telecommunications overhaul measure to the Senate floor. But while Sen Stevens said he is close to the 60-vote mark, he acknowledged during an impromptu interview that he has not reached it. See Stevens 'Very Close' To Votes Needed For Senate Telecom Bill

* On June 28, by a 15-7 vote, the Senate Commerce Committee voted to send the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act to the full Senate for a vote. Its fate there is hardly assured. See http://www.benton.org/node/2818. Backers will have to line up 60 votes to ensure an up/down vote on the bill. They hope to get those votes -- and floor time in the Senate -- in September.

* On June 27, the Senate Commerce Committee began its second day of hearings on video franchise reform with Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) trying to accommodate a host of groups in marking up a bill he hopes will pass committee and the full Senate. He does not yet have the necessary votes to get legislation to overhaul communications laws through the full Senate and Sen Ron Wyden (D-OR) promised to block any bill that does not contain strong Net Neutrality provisions. See a recap of the day's developments at http://www.benton.org/node/2814

* Broadcasting&Cable reports that fate of the Senate's video franchise/telecom reform bill grew cloudier Thursday (6/22) as votes on a raft of amendments were put off until next week and Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) reportedly questioned whether he had the votes to block a filibuster on the floor. Thursday's markup of the bill was expected to go deep into the day but ended after only a couple of hours. Chairman Stevens postponed further action on the bill until Tuesday June 27. See http://www.benton.org/node/2784

* A list of amendments that may be offered at the June 22 mark-up.

* On June 16, a third draft of the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act was released. Reuters reports that Sen Stevens has added a new section to his bill aimed at preserving consumers' ability to surf anywhere on the public Internet and use any Web-based application. However, the new draft does not include a ban on pricing content companies have demanded. Sen Stevens' compromise would also create a complaint process through the FCC if consumers believe their access rights were violated and the agency would be authorized to adjudicate complaints with penalties, according to the draft. However, the FCC would be barred from issuing any regulations under the new law that would add to the obligations on Internet service providers. The compromise is somewhat similar to legislation that passed the House of Representatives. See a quick summary of the new Network Neutrality provisions.

* On June 9, a new draft of the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act was released.

* On June 8, 2006, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) said that a revised draft of his committee's version of a communications reform/video franchise reform bill will not be released this week. He will review the Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement (COPE) Act (HR 5252) passed by the House on the same day.

At the May 18 Senate Commerce Committee hearing, Chairman Ted Stevens announced a revised schedule for consideration of the bill: schedule for consideration for what could be a fast-moving bill:

* Communications Reform Bill Hearing I
Thursday, May 18th
10:00 am
commerce.senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=1872

* Communications Reform Bill Hearing II
Thursday, May 25th
10:00 am
commerce.senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=1873

* Communications Reform Bill Hearing III
Tuesday, June 13th

* Full Committee Markup
Tuesday, June 20th

Resources

* On Sept 30, the Senate Commerce Committee released its report on the Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement Act of 2006.

* September 5, 2006: A new summary of the bill is now available.

* The Truth About Telecom Taxes and Reform: The Real Effect on Local Government

Supporters

* USTelecom
"Senators Stevens and Inouye have crafted legislation that will bring real video choice, put consumers in charge of the dynamic communications market and address the future of the nation's universal service system. The bill's introduction today is a significant step toward meaningful reform and we look forward to working with both the Senate and House to enact legislation this year."
http://www.ustelecom.org/news_releases.php?urh=home.news.nr2006_0501

On Sept 19, 2006 more than 100 companies from the networking and communications sector, including Cisco Systems, Nortel Networks and Qualcomm, signed their names to a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The one-page document encouraged them to schedule a vote "in the very near future," adding that it was "too soon to enact network neutrality legislation."

Detractors

* On June 20, Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii, the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee, refused to endorse the newest version of a sweeping telecommunications bill sponsored by chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), calling the third draft released last Friday “a further step backward for consumers.” Without support from Inouye, Stevens might have trouble producing a bill that won't spark a partisan battle on the Senate floor. “I had hoped throughout the process that our committee members could work together to develop a bipartisan bill that would encourage innovation, promote fair competition, and ensure that all consumers would get the full benefits of modern communications networks,” Sen Inouye said. "Regrettably, [I and some committee Democrats] believe the latest draft of communications legislation marks a further step backward for consumers, and it calls into question our commitment to passing a bipartisan communications reform package in this Congress."

* The Heartland Institute
"The draft telecom reform bill sponsored by Sens. Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Daniel Inouye (D-HI) and made public today is disappointing to those who believe the nation's telecom industry needs to be deregulated, not simply regulated in a different way. While giving the most limited of nods to issues of video franchising and network neutrality, the bill does little more than extend into broadband the current costly, unproductive, and largely unworkable regulatory regime. It fails to acknowledge, as previous state and federal reform bills have, that much of the digital economy -- the Internet, PCs, e-commerce, wireless networking, and new media -- thrives in the absence of regulation and legislation. Instead, this bill perversely does its best to search out new areas to regulate."
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=18985

* Sept 6, 2006 The National League of Cities released The Truth About Telecom Taxes and Reform: The Real Effect on Local Government. U.S. state and local governments could lose $8 billion a year in revenue if Congress further restricts their ability to tax telecommunications services, the report finds.

* Sept 14, 2006 The National Association of Attorneys General sent a letter to Congress opposing provisions in the Advanced Telecommunications and Opportunity Reform Act that would preempt state law and enforcement as they pertain to wireless carriers and voice over internet protocol (VOIP) service providers. See http://www.naag.org/news/pdf/20060915.WirelessPreemption.pdf

Date

May 1, 2006