The Future of Internet Freedom

Earlier today, I shared with my fellow Commissioners a proposal to reverse the mistake of Title II and return to the light-touch regulatory framework that served our nation so well during the Clinton Administration, the Bush Administration, and the first six years of the Obama Administration. The document that we will be voting on at the FCC’s May meeting is called a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. If it is adopted, the FCC will seek public input on this proposal. In other words, this will be the beginning of the discussion, not the end. Now, some have called on the FCC to reverse Title II immediately, through what is known as a Declaratory Ruling. But I don’t believe that is the right path forward. This decision should be made through an open and transparent process in which every American can share his or her views.

So what are the basic elements of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking?
First, we are proposing to return the classification of broadband service from a Title II telecommunications service to a Title I information service—that is, light-touch regulation drawn from the Clinton Administration. As I mentioned earlier, this Title I classification was expressly upheld by the Supreme Court in 2005, and it’s more consistent with the facts and the law.
Second, we are proposing to eliminate the so-called Internet conduct standard. This 2015 rule gives the FCC a roving mandate to micromanage the Internet.
Third, we are seeking comment on how we should approach the so-called bright-line rules adopted in 2015.


The Future of Internet Freedom The FCC just released a plan to undo its own net neutrality rules (Washington Post) FCC head unveils plan to roll back net neutrality (The Hill) FCC chief unveils plan to dismantle net neutrality rules (LA Times) Ajit Pai announces plan to eliminate Title II net neutrality rules (ars technica) FCC chief lays out attack on ‘net neutrality’ rules (AP) Regulator Outlines Net-Neutrality Rollback (WSJ) F.C.C. Chairman Pushes Sweeping Changes to Net Neutrality Rules (NYTimes)